《形而上学》Γ中普罗泰哥拉的两个公式Τhesis和柏拉图的《忒阿德图》

Volkova
{"title":"《形而上学》Γ中普罗泰哥拉的两个公式Τhesis和柏拉图的《忒阿德图》","authors":"Volkova","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This presentation deals with the Aristotelian interpretation of the Thesis of Protagoras (TP) in Metaphysics Γ and its connection with Plato's Theaetetus. Particular attention is paid to the dispute about the difference between two formulations of TP, which takes place among modern scholars. If the first formulation only denies Principle of Non-Contradiction, the second allows Aristotle to interpret TP in the context of the teaching of Anaxagoras.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Formulations of the Τhesis of Protagoras in Metaphysics Γ and Plato's Theaetetus\",\"authors\":\"Volkova\",\"doi\":\"10.47850/S.2020.1.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This presentation deals with the Aristotelian interpretation of the Thesis of Protagoras (TP) in Metaphysics Γ and its connection with Plato's Theaetetus. Particular attention is paid to the dispute about the difference between two formulations of TP, which takes place among modern scholars. If the first formulation only denies Principle of Non-Contradiction, the second allows Aristotle to interpret TP in the context of the teaching of Anaxagoras.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respublica literaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本演讲涉及亚里士多德对《形而上学》Γ中普罗泰哥拉提纲(TP)的解释,以及它与柏拉图的《泰阿德图》的联系。本文特别关注了现代学者之间关于TP两种表述差异的争论。如果第一种表述只否认非矛盾性原则,那么第二种表述则允许亚里士多德在阿那克萨哥拉的教学背景下解释TP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Two Formulations of the Τhesis of Protagoras in Metaphysics Γ and Plato's Theaetetus
This presentation deals with the Aristotelian interpretation of the Thesis of Protagoras (TP) in Metaphysics Γ and its connection with Plato's Theaetetus. Particular attention is paid to the dispute about the difference between two formulations of TP, which takes place among modern scholars. If the first formulation only denies Principle of Non-Contradiction, the second allows Aristotle to interpret TP in the context of the teaching of Anaxagoras.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classical philosophy in Novosibirsk Scientific Center. The pages of history The Philosophical Studies in Antiquity: Chapter of History THE CONCEPT OF UTILITY IN CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE'S PRAGMATISM IN A LABYRINTH OF CONTEXTS. Book Review: Philosophy and Its History. Discussions: Textbook / editor, introduction, translation and comments by M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk, 2021. 239 p. COMPARATIVE CONCEPTOLOGY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE USING GOOGLE NGRAM BOOKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1