{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)感染诊断中的挑战","authors":"M. Pal, M. Bulcha, Wakuma Mitiku Bune","doi":"10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 is only feasible by detecting nucleic acid content (i.e., RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 in the biological samples, which is an almost logical result of this clear connotation.5,6 Despite the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection thoroughout the world. However, these real-time PCR test kits have a number of drawbacks. Aside from the sample collection and transportation limitations, as well as kit results, the overall positive rate of RT-PCR for throat swab samples was estimated to be between 30% and 60% at first presentation. There are two types of SARS–CoV-2 experiments: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s reaction to the virus. While the virus can be cultured, this is a dangerous procedure that is not done in clinical laboratories on a regular basis.5-7","PeriodicalId":127077,"journal":{"name":"MOJ Biology and Medicine","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection\",\"authors\":\"M. Pal, M. Bulcha, Wakuma Mitiku Bune\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 is only feasible by detecting nucleic acid content (i.e., RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 in the biological samples, which is an almost logical result of this clear connotation.5,6 Despite the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection thoroughout the world. However, these real-time PCR test kits have a number of drawbacks. Aside from the sample collection and transportation limitations, as well as kit results, the overall positive rate of RT-PCR for throat swab samples was estimated to be between 30% and 60% at first presentation. There are two types of SARS–CoV-2 experiments: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s reaction to the virus. While the virus can be cultured, this is a dangerous procedure that is not done in clinical laboratories on a regular basis.5-7\",\"PeriodicalId\":127077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MOJ Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MOJ Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/mojbm.2021.06.00143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenges in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection
The etiological diagnosis of COVID-19 is only feasible by detecting nucleic acid content (i.e., RNA) of SARS-CoV-2 in the biological samples, which is an almost logical result of this clear connotation.5,6 Despite the fact that the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test has become the gold standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection thoroughout the world. However, these real-time PCR test kits have a number of drawbacks. Aside from the sample collection and transportation limitations, as well as kit results, the overall positive rate of RT-PCR for throat swab samples was estimated to be between 30% and 60% at first presentation. There are two types of SARS–CoV-2 experiments: those that detect the virus itself and those that detect the host’s reaction to the virus. While the virus can be cultured, this is a dangerous procedure that is not done in clinical laboratories on a regular basis.5-7