阴道手术分娩

G. Dildy, S. Clark
{"title":"阴道手术分娩","authors":"G. Dildy, S. Clark","doi":"10.1002/9781119072980.CH54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operative vaginal delivery is used to achieve or expedite safe vaginal delivery for maternal or fetal indications. Examples include maternal exhaustion and an inability to push effectively; medical indications such as maternal cardiac disease and a need to avoid pushing in the second stage of labor; prolonged second stage of labor, arrest of descent, or rotation of the fetal head; and nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor. Operative vaginal delivery is beneficial for women because it avoids cesarean delivery and its associated morbidities. The short-term risks of cesarean delivery include hemorrhage, infection, prolonged healing time, and increased cost. The long-term morbidities associated with cesarean delivery include the high likelihood of repeat cesarean delivery, the complications that can occur with trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and the risks of placental abnormalities such as placenta accreta. For the fetus showing signs of possible compromise, successful operative vaginal delivery can shorten the exposure to additional labor and reduce or prevent the effect of intrapartum insults (2). Often, operative vaginal delivery can be safely accomplished more quickly than cesarean delivery. The rate of operative vaginal delivery has decreased over the past few decades, accounting for part of the increase in cesarean birth rates in the United States. As the rate of cesarean delivery increased over the past two decades, the rate of operative vaginal delivery decreased from 9.01% of all deliveries in 1992 to 3.30% of all deliveries in 2013 (1). Nonetheless, operative vaginal delivery remains an important part of modern obstetric care and in the appropriate circumstances can be used to safely avoid cesarean delivery. Operative vaginal deliveries are accomplished by applying direct traction on the fetal skull with forceps or applying traction to the fetal scalp by means of a vacuum extractor (3). Various types of forceps and vacuum extractors have been developed for this purpose, and readers should refer to textbooks for review of these instruments (4–6). Whichever instrument is used, the indications for operative vaginal delivery are the same (Box 1). Operative vaginal deliveries are classified by the station of the fetal head at application and the degree of rotation necessary for delivery (Box 2). In an evaluation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ classification, investigators demonstrated that the lower the fetal head and the less rotation required, Operative Vaginal Delivery","PeriodicalId":250776,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative vaginal delivery\",\"authors\":\"G. Dildy, S. Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9781119072980.CH54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operative vaginal delivery is used to achieve or expedite safe vaginal delivery for maternal or fetal indications. Examples include maternal exhaustion and an inability to push effectively; medical indications such as maternal cardiac disease and a need to avoid pushing in the second stage of labor; prolonged second stage of labor, arrest of descent, or rotation of the fetal head; and nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor. Operative vaginal delivery is beneficial for women because it avoids cesarean delivery and its associated morbidities. The short-term risks of cesarean delivery include hemorrhage, infection, prolonged healing time, and increased cost. The long-term morbidities associated with cesarean delivery include the high likelihood of repeat cesarean delivery, the complications that can occur with trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and the risks of placental abnormalities such as placenta accreta. For the fetus showing signs of possible compromise, successful operative vaginal delivery can shorten the exposure to additional labor and reduce or prevent the effect of intrapartum insults (2). Often, operative vaginal delivery can be safely accomplished more quickly than cesarean delivery. The rate of operative vaginal delivery has decreased over the past few decades, accounting for part of the increase in cesarean birth rates in the United States. As the rate of cesarean delivery increased over the past two decades, the rate of operative vaginal delivery decreased from 9.01% of all deliveries in 1992 to 3.30% of all deliveries in 2013 (1). Nonetheless, operative vaginal delivery remains an important part of modern obstetric care and in the appropriate circumstances can be used to safely avoid cesarean delivery. Operative vaginal deliveries are accomplished by applying direct traction on the fetal skull with forceps or applying traction to the fetal scalp by means of a vacuum extractor (3). Various types of forceps and vacuum extractors have been developed for this purpose, and readers should refer to textbooks for review of these instruments (4–6). Whichever instrument is used, the indications for operative vaginal delivery are the same (Box 1). Operative vaginal deliveries are classified by the station of the fetal head at application and the degree of rotation necessary for delivery (Box 2). In an evaluation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ classification, investigators demonstrated that the lower the fetal head and the less rotation required, Operative Vaginal Delivery\",\"PeriodicalId\":250776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072980.CH54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119072980.CH54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术阴道分娩是用来实现或加快安全阴道分娩的产妇或胎儿指征。例子包括母亲的疲惫和无法有效地推动;医学指征,如产妇心脏疾病和需要避免在分娩第二阶段推;分娩第二阶段延长,停止下降或胎头旋转;以及分娩第二阶段胎儿心率不稳定的情况。阴道手术分娩对妇女是有益的,因为它避免了剖宫产及其相关的发病率。剖宫产的短期风险包括出血、感染、愈合时间延长和费用增加。与剖宫产相关的长期发病率包括重复剖宫产的高可能性、剖宫产后试产时可能出现的并发症以及胎盘异常(如胎盘增生)的风险。对于有可能出现妥协迹象的胎儿,成功的阴道手术分娩可以缩短额外分娩的时间,减少或防止产时损伤的影响(2)。通常,阴道手术分娩比剖宫产更安全、更快。在过去的几十年里,阴道分娩的手术率有所下降,这是美国剖宫产率上升的部分原因。随着近二十年剖宫产率的上升,阴道手术分娩的比例从1992年的9.01%下降到2013年的3.30%(1)。尽管如此,阴道手术分娩仍然是现代产科护理的重要组成部分,在适当的情况下可以安全避免剖宫产。手术阴道分娩是通过用镊子直接牵引胎儿颅骨或通过真空抽提器牵引胎儿头皮来完成的(3)。为此目的已经开发了各种类型的镊子和真空抽提器,读者应该参考教科书来复习这些工具(4-6)。无论使用何种器械,手术阴道分娩的适应症都是相同的(方框1)。手术阴道分娩是根据使用时胎儿头的位置和分娩所需的旋转程度进行分类的(方框2)。在对美国妇产科医师学会分类的评估中,研究者证明,胎儿头越低,需要的旋转越少,手术阴道分娩
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Operative vaginal delivery
Operative vaginal delivery is used to achieve or expedite safe vaginal delivery for maternal or fetal indications. Examples include maternal exhaustion and an inability to push effectively; medical indications such as maternal cardiac disease and a need to avoid pushing in the second stage of labor; prolonged second stage of labor, arrest of descent, or rotation of the fetal head; and nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns in the second stage of labor. Operative vaginal delivery is beneficial for women because it avoids cesarean delivery and its associated morbidities. The short-term risks of cesarean delivery include hemorrhage, infection, prolonged healing time, and increased cost. The long-term morbidities associated with cesarean delivery include the high likelihood of repeat cesarean delivery, the complications that can occur with trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and the risks of placental abnormalities such as placenta accreta. For the fetus showing signs of possible compromise, successful operative vaginal delivery can shorten the exposure to additional labor and reduce or prevent the effect of intrapartum insults (2). Often, operative vaginal delivery can be safely accomplished more quickly than cesarean delivery. The rate of operative vaginal delivery has decreased over the past few decades, accounting for part of the increase in cesarean birth rates in the United States. As the rate of cesarean delivery increased over the past two decades, the rate of operative vaginal delivery decreased from 9.01% of all deliveries in 1992 to 3.30% of all deliveries in 2013 (1). Nonetheless, operative vaginal delivery remains an important part of modern obstetric care and in the appropriate circumstances can be used to safely avoid cesarean delivery. Operative vaginal deliveries are accomplished by applying direct traction on the fetal skull with forceps or applying traction to the fetal scalp by means of a vacuum extractor (3). Various types of forceps and vacuum extractors have been developed for this purpose, and readers should refer to textbooks for review of these instruments (4–6). Whichever instrument is used, the indications for operative vaginal delivery are the same (Box 1). Operative vaginal deliveries are classified by the station of the fetal head at application and the degree of rotation necessary for delivery (Box 2). In an evaluation of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ classification, investigators demonstrated that the lower the fetal head and the less rotation required, Operative Vaginal Delivery
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence-Based Medicine in Obstetrics and Gynecology Diagnosis and management of antiphospholipid syndrome Methods for spontaneous delivery Miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy Disorders of amniotic fluid volume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1