使用潜在语义分析自动评分编程作业

Karti­nah Zen, D. A. Iskandar, Ongkir Linang
{"title":"使用潜在语义分析自动评分编程作业","authors":"Karti­nah Zen, D. A. Iskandar, Ongkir Linang","doi":"10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, computer programming assignments are graded manually by educators. As this task is tedious, time-consuming and prone to bias, the need for automated grading tool is necessary to reduce the educators' burden and avoid inconsistency and favoritism. Recent researches have claimed that Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) has the ability to represent human cognitive knowledge to assess essays, retrieving information, classification of documents and indexing. In this paper, we adapt LSA technique to grade computer programming assignments and observe how far it can be applied as an alternative approach to traditional grading methods by human. The grades of the assignments are generated from the cosine similarity that shows how close students' assignments to the model answers in the latent semantic vector space. The results show that LSA is not able to detect orders of computer programming and symbols; however, LSA is able to grade assignments faster and consistently, which avoid bias and reduces the time spent by human.","PeriodicalId":376671,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Latent Semantic Analysis for automated grading programming assignments\",\"authors\":\"Karti­nah Zen, D. A. Iskandar, Ongkir Linang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, computer programming assignments are graded manually by educators. As this task is tedious, time-consuming and prone to bias, the need for automated grading tool is necessary to reduce the educators' burden and avoid inconsistency and favoritism. Recent researches have claimed that Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) has the ability to represent human cognitive knowledge to assess essays, retrieving information, classification of documents and indexing. In this paper, we adapt LSA technique to grade computer programming assignments and observe how far it can be applied as an alternative approach to traditional grading methods by human. The grades of the assignments are generated from the cosine similarity that shows how close students' assignments to the model answers in the latent semantic vector space. The results show that LSA is not able to detect orders of computer programming and symbols; however, LSA is able to grade assignments faster and consistently, which avoid bias and reduces the time spent by human.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995769\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

传统上,计算机编程作业是由教育者手动评分的。由于这项任务繁琐、耗时且容易产生偏见,因此需要自动评分工具来减轻教育工作者的负担,避免不一致和偏袒。近年来的研究表明,潜在语义分析(LSA)具有表征人类认知知识的能力,可用于评价文章、检索信息、文档分类和索引。在本文中,我们将LSA技术应用于计算机编程作业的评分,并观察它在多大程度上可以作为传统的人工评分方法的替代方法。作业的分数是由余弦相似度生成的,余弦相似度显示了学生的作业与潜在语义向量空间中的模型答案的接近程度。结果表明,LSA不能检测计算机程序和符号的顺序;然而,LSA能够更快和一致地对作业进行评分,从而避免了偏见,减少了人工花费的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Latent Semantic Analysis for automated grading programming assignments
Traditionally, computer programming assignments are graded manually by educators. As this task is tedious, time-consuming and prone to bias, the need for automated grading tool is necessary to reduce the educators' burden and avoid inconsistency and favoritism. Recent researches have claimed that Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) has the ability to represent human cognitive knowledge to assess essays, retrieving information, classification of documents and indexing. In this paper, we adapt LSA technique to grade computer programming assignments and observe how far it can be applied as an alternative approach to traditional grading methods by human. The grades of the assignments are generated from the cosine similarity that shows how close students' assignments to the model answers in the latent semantic vector space. The results show that LSA is not able to detect orders of computer programming and symbols; however, LSA is able to grade assignments faster and consistently, which avoid bias and reduces the time spent by human.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Word Sense Disambiguation by using domain knowledge Morphological analysis for rule based machine translation Measuring flow in gaming platforms Construction of topics and clusters in Topic Detection and Tracking tasks Phonetic coding methods for Malay names retrieval
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1