基于随机图模型的智能无线网络行为流行分析

Rohit Singh, H. Jamadagni
{"title":"基于随机图模型的智能无线网络行为流行分析","authors":"Rohit Singh, H. Jamadagni","doi":"10.1109/ANTS.2015.7413658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In distributed wireless networks, nodes are expected to spend their own resources so as to relay other nodes messages. This setup is governed by the trade-off between connectivity across the network and minimum interference, which maps to the standard Random Geometric Graph model. Even though smart network helps here, problem is that cognitive nodes may violate rules of cooperation with selfish intention of reaping the benefits from other nodes without bearing its cost. This leads to a behavioral epidemic causing nodes to follow non-cooperative strategy bringing down the network performance. In this paper, we examine the optimal way to choose control nodes using a central coordinator. We show by analysis that contrary to the general intuition, there exists a range of interest where random selection of control nodes outperforms that by highest degree ordering for the number of control nodes. We then simulate the mechanisms of inspections and counter-epidemic for these two control node selection procedures and verify the result.","PeriodicalId":347920,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral epidemic analysis on Random Graph model for smart wireless networks\",\"authors\":\"Rohit Singh, H. Jamadagni\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ANTS.2015.7413658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In distributed wireless networks, nodes are expected to spend their own resources so as to relay other nodes messages. This setup is governed by the trade-off between connectivity across the network and minimum interference, which maps to the standard Random Geometric Graph model. Even though smart network helps here, problem is that cognitive nodes may violate rules of cooperation with selfish intention of reaping the benefits from other nodes without bearing its cost. This leads to a behavioral epidemic causing nodes to follow non-cooperative strategy bringing down the network performance. In this paper, we examine the optimal way to choose control nodes using a central coordinator. We show by analysis that contrary to the general intuition, there exists a range of interest where random selection of control nodes outperforms that by highest degree ordering for the number of control nodes. We then simulate the mechanisms of inspections and counter-epidemic for these two control node selection procedures and verify the result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2015.7413658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANTS.2015.7413658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在分布式无线网络中,节点需要花费自己的资源来转发其他节点的消息。这种设置是由跨网络的连接性和最小干扰之间的权衡所控制的,这映射到标准的随机几何图模型。尽管智能网络在这方面有所帮助,但问题是,认知节点可能会违反合作规则,自私地从其他节点获取利益,而不承担其成本。这导致了一种行为流行病,导致节点遵循非合作策略,从而降低了网络性能。在本文中,我们研究了使用中心协调器选择控制节点的最佳方法。我们通过分析表明,与一般的直觉相反,存在一个兴趣范围,其中随机选择控制节点优于控制节点数量的最高程度排序。然后,我们对这两个控制节点选择程序的检查和反流行机制进行了模拟,并验证了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavioral epidemic analysis on Random Graph model for smart wireless networks
In distributed wireless networks, nodes are expected to spend their own resources so as to relay other nodes messages. This setup is governed by the trade-off between connectivity across the network and minimum interference, which maps to the standard Random Geometric Graph model. Even though smart network helps here, problem is that cognitive nodes may violate rules of cooperation with selfish intention of reaping the benefits from other nodes without bearing its cost. This leads to a behavioral epidemic causing nodes to follow non-cooperative strategy bringing down the network performance. In this paper, we examine the optimal way to choose control nodes using a central coordinator. We show by analysis that contrary to the general intuition, there exists a range of interest where random selection of control nodes outperforms that by highest degree ordering for the number of control nodes. We then simulate the mechanisms of inspections and counter-epidemic for these two control node selection procedures and verify the result.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamic multi-hop switch handoffs in Software Defined Wireless Mesh Networks Genetic max-SINR algorithm for interference alignment Reconfigurable and efficient fronthaul of 5G systems Carbon-aware routing in software defined inter data center network “NeSen” - a tool for measuring link quality and stability of heterogeneous cellular network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1