A. Kosari, M. Peyrovani, M. Fakoor, H. N. Pishkenari
{"title":"反力轮对地静止卫星姿态控制LQG/LTR控制器设计","authors":"A. Kosari, M. Peyrovani, M. Fakoor, H. N. Pishkenari","doi":"10.1109/VPPC.2013.6671729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, LQG/LTR controller is designed for attitude control of the geostationary satellite at nominal mode. Usage actuator is the reaction wheel and control torque is determined by the LQR regulator. LQR controller signal has good performance, if all states are considered in feedback, but does not include model and sensors noises. Usage sensors are sun and earth sensors and EKF is used for estimation of noisy states. Then, LQG and LQG/LTR controllers are designed based on the estimated states, and are compared with LQR controller. The results show that robustness and performance of LQG/LTR are better than LQG and its control overshoot is smaller than LQR. The term that is provided in designs, is avoiding of saturation of actuator.","PeriodicalId":119598,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of LQG/LTR Controller for Attitude Control of Geostationary Satellite Using Reaction Wheels\",\"authors\":\"A. Kosari, M. Peyrovani, M. Fakoor, H. N. Pishkenari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VPPC.2013.6671729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, LQG/LTR controller is designed for attitude control of the geostationary satellite at nominal mode. Usage actuator is the reaction wheel and control torque is determined by the LQR regulator. LQR controller signal has good performance, if all states are considered in feedback, but does not include model and sensors noises. Usage sensors are sun and earth sensors and EKF is used for estimation of noisy states. Then, LQG and LQG/LTR controllers are designed based on the estimated states, and are compared with LQR controller. The results show that robustness and performance of LQG/LTR are better than LQG and its control overshoot is smaller than LQR. The term that is provided in designs, is avoiding of saturation of actuator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2013.6671729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2013.6671729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design of LQG/LTR Controller for Attitude Control of Geostationary Satellite Using Reaction Wheels
In this paper, LQG/LTR controller is designed for attitude control of the geostationary satellite at nominal mode. Usage actuator is the reaction wheel and control torque is determined by the LQR regulator. LQR controller signal has good performance, if all states are considered in feedback, but does not include model and sensors noises. Usage sensors are sun and earth sensors and EKF is used for estimation of noisy states. Then, LQG and LQG/LTR controllers are designed based on the estimated states, and are compared with LQR controller. The results show that robustness and performance of LQG/LTR are better than LQG and its control overshoot is smaller than LQR. The term that is provided in designs, is avoiding of saturation of actuator.