技术传播专业提案写作教学法趋势的初步研究:教学大纲课程描述与目标的内容分析

Mika Stepankiw
{"title":"技术传播专业提案写作教学法趋势的初步研究:教学大纲课程描述与目标的内容分析","authors":"Mika Stepankiw","doi":"10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Typically, proposal writing conjures up images of grant proposals with stringent requirements—word limits, specific questions that must be answered, and detailed accounts of how funds will be used. However, growing in prevalence are philanthropic proposals, which often have more variability and flexibility in the format of these proposals and can be just as lucrative if not more. With government funding becoming more competitive and restrictive—and increased funding coming from philanthropy—technical communication students need to be familiar with the unique requirements of both philanthropic and grant proposals. However, not only is proposal writing considered a complex subject to teach, there are limited data about the extent to which philanthropic proposal writing is taught in universities.This study builds on previous research by conducting a content analysis of course descriptions and objectives in syllabi from the publicly available undergraduate proposal writing courses housed within English departments or technical communications programs. While data was limited, preliminary results identified the most common themes to center around rhetoric and grant principles with philanthropy rarely included.","PeriodicalId":423952,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Study of Proposal Writing Pedagogy Trends in Technical Communications Programs: A Content Analysis of Syllabi Course Descriptions and Objectives\",\"authors\":\"Mika Stepankiw\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Typically, proposal writing conjures up images of grant proposals with stringent requirements—word limits, specific questions that must be answered, and detailed accounts of how funds will be used. However, growing in prevalence are philanthropic proposals, which often have more variability and flexibility in the format of these proposals and can be just as lucrative if not more. With government funding becoming more competitive and restrictive—and increased funding coming from philanthropy—technical communication students need to be familiar with the unique requirements of both philanthropic and grant proposals. However, not only is proposal writing considered a complex subject to teach, there are limited data about the extent to which philanthropic proposal writing is taught in universities.This study builds on previous research by conducting a content analysis of course descriptions and objectives in syllabi from the publicly available undergraduate proposal writing courses housed within English departments or technical communications programs. While data was limited, preliminary results identified the most common themes to center around rhetoric and grant principles with philanthropy rarely included.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm57838.2023.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常,提案写作会让人联想到具有严格要求的奖助金提案的图像-字数限制,必须回答的具体问题,以及如何使用资金的详细说明。然而,越来越普遍的是慈善提案,这些提案的格式往往具有更多的可变性和灵活性,即使不是更多,也可以同样有利可图。随着政府资助变得更具竞争性和限制性,以及来自慈善机构的资助越来越多,技术传播专业的学生需要熟悉慈善机构和资助提案的独特要求。然而,不仅提案写作被认为是一门复杂的学科,而且关于大学教授慈善提案写作的程度的数据也很有限。本研究建立在先前研究的基础上,通过对英语系或技术通信专业公开提供的本科提案写作课程大纲中的课程描述和目标进行内容分析。虽然数据有限,但初步结果确定了最常见的主题是围绕修辞和赠款原则,而慈善很少包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pilot Study of Proposal Writing Pedagogy Trends in Technical Communications Programs: A Content Analysis of Syllabi Course Descriptions and Objectives
Typically, proposal writing conjures up images of grant proposals with stringent requirements—word limits, specific questions that must be answered, and detailed accounts of how funds will be used. However, growing in prevalence are philanthropic proposals, which often have more variability and flexibility in the format of these proposals and can be just as lucrative if not more. With government funding becoming more competitive and restrictive—and increased funding coming from philanthropy—technical communication students need to be familiar with the unique requirements of both philanthropic and grant proposals. However, not only is proposal writing considered a complex subject to teach, there are limited data about the extent to which philanthropic proposal writing is taught in universities.This study builds on previous research by conducting a content analysis of course descriptions and objectives in syllabi from the publicly available undergraduate proposal writing courses housed within English departments or technical communications programs. While data was limited, preliminary results identified the most common themes to center around rhetoric and grant principles with philanthropy rarely included.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changing Course: Collaborative (Re)Design of an Engineering Communication Curriculum An Exploratory Study Mapping Approaches to Teaching Writing in Engineering Curriculum Development for the First Technical Communication Study Program in Kenya: The Challenges of Digitalization The Goofy Roots of the Plain Language Movement: Reconsidering the Rhetorical Hedonism of ‘Gobbledygook Has Gotta Go’ Inclusive Recruitment Strategies for Recruiting International Graduate Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1