罗蒂、哈贝马斯与激进社会批判

M. Bacon, Nat Rutherford
{"title":"罗蒂、哈贝马斯与激进社会批判","authors":"M. Bacon, Nat Rutherford","doi":"10.4324/9780429324734-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, we make three connected claims. First, despite Rorty’s expressed ‘bourgeois liberal’ reformism, there are philosophical resources within his political philosophy which indicate a latent programme of radical social criticism. Second, we argue against the charge that Rorty is a relativist who lacks the necessary foundations for social criticism by comparing the liberalisms of Rorty and Jürgen Habermas. Thirdly, we argue that Rorty’s anti-foundationalism would commit him, by his own lights, to engage in radical criticism of actually-existing liberalism. On this account of Rorty’s political philosophy, the idea that redescription of our social situation might take us beyond bourgeois liberalism becomes a real possibility.","PeriodicalId":298858,"journal":{"name":"The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty","volume":"464 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rorty, Habermas, and Radical Social Criticism\",\"authors\":\"M. Bacon, Nat Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429324734-14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, we make three connected claims. First, despite Rorty’s expressed ‘bourgeois liberal’ reformism, there are philosophical resources within his political philosophy which indicate a latent programme of radical social criticism. Second, we argue against the charge that Rorty is a relativist who lacks the necessary foundations for social criticism by comparing the liberalisms of Rorty and Jürgen Habermas. Thirdly, we argue that Rorty’s anti-foundationalism would commit him, by his own lights, to engage in radical criticism of actually-existing liberalism. On this account of Rorty’s political philosophy, the idea that redescription of our social situation might take us beyond bourgeois liberalism becomes a real possibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty\",\"volume\":\"464 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324734-14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ethics, Epistemology, and Politics of Richard Rorty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324734-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本章中,我们提出三个相互关联的主张。首先,尽管罗蒂表达了“资产阶级自由主义”改良主义,但在他的政治哲学中有哲学资源,表明了激进社会批评的潜在纲领。其次,我们通过比较罗蒂和哈贝马斯的自由主义来反驳罗蒂是一个缺乏社会批判必要基础的相对主义者的指控。第三,我们认为罗蒂的反基础主义将使他按照自己的观点,对实际存在的自由主义进行激进的批评。根据罗蒂的政治哲学,重新描述我们的社会状况可能使我们超越资产阶级自由主义的想法成为一种现实的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rorty, Habermas, and Radical Social Criticism
In this chapter, we make three connected claims. First, despite Rorty’s expressed ‘bourgeois liberal’ reformism, there are philosophical resources within his political philosophy which indicate a latent programme of radical social criticism. Second, we argue against the charge that Rorty is a relativist who lacks the necessary foundations for social criticism by comparing the liberalisms of Rorty and Jürgen Habermas. Thirdly, we argue that Rorty’s anti-foundationalism would commit him, by his own lights, to engage in radical criticism of actually-existing liberalism. On this account of Rorty’s political philosophy, the idea that redescription of our social situation might take us beyond bourgeois liberalism becomes a real possibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Should Rorty Say about Relativism? Bildung, Unimportance, and Moral Progress Philosophy, Literature, Politics Pragmatism and the Mirror of Law Rorty and Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1