3D-MFC:一种基于虚拟标记跟踪的关键步态参数计算方法

Hao Chen, Wenming Chen, Li Chen, Xiong Yang, Xin Ma
{"title":"3D-MFC:一种基于虚拟标记跟踪的关键步态参数计算方法","authors":"Hao Chen, Wenming Chen, Li Chen, Xiong Yang, Xin Ma","doi":"10.1109/CISP-BMEI56279.2022.9979984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimum foot clearance (MFC) is defined as the minimum vertical distance between the lowest point of the swing foot or shoe and the walking surface in gait, which is now considered as a critical gait parameter for predicting trip-related fall risks. Different MFC methods have been used to assess fall risks by tripping, with the analytical method proposed by Begg et al. being the most widely used one. Since this method is based on assumption of a 2D triangular geometric model of the foot, the effects of out-of-plane rotations of the foot/shoe on MFC were not completely known. Furthermore, the accuracy of the MFC maybe influenced by factors such as shoe type, limiting its potential applications in clinical scenarios. Thus, this study proposes a novel method to calculate MFC parameter (called 3D-MFC) based on 3D modeling of the “virtual” markers of the shoe. By using a dynamic point-tracking technology, the 3D-MFC can automatically extract the MFC height while subject walking. From the Bland-Altman analysis, it was shown the 3D-MFC agreed well with that of the Begg's 2D-Geometric method. However, the mean absolute error (MSE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the 3D-MFC method were less than 1 mm, which significantly outperformed the 2D-Geometric method, especially for subjects using rocker-bottom shoe. It is suggested that the 3D-MFC has potential to be an effective solution for identifying the MFC parameters and is expected to be used for biomechanical assessment of trip-related fall risks in the elderly.","PeriodicalId":198522,"journal":{"name":"2022 15th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D-MFC: A method for computing critical gait parameters based on virtual marker tracking\",\"authors\":\"Hao Chen, Wenming Chen, Li Chen, Xiong Yang, Xin Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISP-BMEI56279.2022.9979984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Minimum foot clearance (MFC) is defined as the minimum vertical distance between the lowest point of the swing foot or shoe and the walking surface in gait, which is now considered as a critical gait parameter for predicting trip-related fall risks. Different MFC methods have been used to assess fall risks by tripping, with the analytical method proposed by Begg et al. being the most widely used one. Since this method is based on assumption of a 2D triangular geometric model of the foot, the effects of out-of-plane rotations of the foot/shoe on MFC were not completely known. Furthermore, the accuracy of the MFC maybe influenced by factors such as shoe type, limiting its potential applications in clinical scenarios. Thus, this study proposes a novel method to calculate MFC parameter (called 3D-MFC) based on 3D modeling of the “virtual” markers of the shoe. By using a dynamic point-tracking technology, the 3D-MFC can automatically extract the MFC height while subject walking. From the Bland-Altman analysis, it was shown the 3D-MFC agreed well with that of the Begg's 2D-Geometric method. However, the mean absolute error (MSE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the 3D-MFC method were less than 1 mm, which significantly outperformed the 2D-Geometric method, especially for subjects using rocker-bottom shoe. It is suggested that the 3D-MFC has potential to be an effective solution for identifying the MFC parameters and is expected to be used for biomechanical assessment of trip-related fall risks in the elderly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 15th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 15th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI56279.2022.9979984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 15th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI56279.2022.9979984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最小足部间隙(Minimum foot clearance, MFC)定义为步态中摆动足或鞋的最低点与行走面之间的最小垂直距离,目前被认为是预测行走相关跌倒风险的关键步态参数。不同的MFC方法已经被用于评估绊倒风险,其中Begg等人提出的分析方法是使用最广泛的一种。由于该方法基于足部二维三角形几何模型的假设,因此足部/鞋的面外旋转对MFC的影响尚不完全清楚。此外,MFC的准确性可能受到鞋型等因素的影响,限制了其在临床场景中的潜在应用。因此,本研究提出了一种基于鞋子“虚拟”标记的3D建模计算MFC参数的新方法(称为3D-MFC)。通过采用动态点跟踪技术,3D-MFC可以自动提取被测者行走时的MFC高度。Bland-Altman分析表明,3D-MFC方法与Begg的2D-Geometric方法非常吻合。然而,3D-MFC方法的平均绝对误差(MSE)和均方根误差(RMSE)均小于1 mm,显著优于2D-Geometric方法,特别是对于使用摇底鞋的受试者。这表明,3D-MFC有可能成为识别MFC参数的有效解决方案,并有望用于老年人绊倒相关跌倒风险的生物力学评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D-MFC: A method for computing critical gait parameters based on virtual marker tracking
Minimum foot clearance (MFC) is defined as the minimum vertical distance between the lowest point of the swing foot or shoe and the walking surface in gait, which is now considered as a critical gait parameter for predicting trip-related fall risks. Different MFC methods have been used to assess fall risks by tripping, with the analytical method proposed by Begg et al. being the most widely used one. Since this method is based on assumption of a 2D triangular geometric model of the foot, the effects of out-of-plane rotations of the foot/shoe on MFC were not completely known. Furthermore, the accuracy of the MFC maybe influenced by factors such as shoe type, limiting its potential applications in clinical scenarios. Thus, this study proposes a novel method to calculate MFC parameter (called 3D-MFC) based on 3D modeling of the “virtual” markers of the shoe. By using a dynamic point-tracking technology, the 3D-MFC can automatically extract the MFC height while subject walking. From the Bland-Altman analysis, it was shown the 3D-MFC agreed well with that of the Begg's 2D-Geometric method. However, the mean absolute error (MSE) and root mean square error (RMSE) of the 3D-MFC method were less than 1 mm, which significantly outperformed the 2D-Geometric method, especially for subjects using rocker-bottom shoe. It is suggested that the 3D-MFC has potential to be an effective solution for identifying the MFC parameters and is expected to be used for biomechanical assessment of trip-related fall risks in the elderly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Point Cloud Registration based Track Correlation Method An End-to-end Image Feature Representation Model of Pulmonary Nodules Vision-Guided Speaker Embedding Based Speech Separation Analysis and Simulation of Interference Effects on CSK Modulation Systems Sentiment Analysis Based On Deep Residual Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1