支持向量机与k -最近邻算法对2019年印尼总统选举情绪分析的比较

Fiki Firmansyah, W. B. Zulfikar, D. Maylawati, Nunik Destria Arianti, L. Muliawaty, M. Septiadi, M. Ramdhani
{"title":"支持向量机与k -最近邻算法对2019年印尼总统选举情绪分析的比较","authors":"Fiki Firmansyah, W. B. Zulfikar, D. Maylawati, Nunik Destria Arianti, L. Muliawaty, M. Septiadi, M. Ramdhani","doi":"10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm with the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm in predicting the results of the Indonesian presidential election 2019 based on sentiment analysis on social media (Twitter). The research methodology used includes several stages: preprocessing and weighting using TF-IDF. The SVM algorithm has the highest accuracy compared to the KNN algorithm. The average accuracy of SVM algorithm is 69.27, with the highest accuracy is 76.5%, while the average value of the KNN algorithm is 61.3% with the highest accuracy of 68.3%. The fastest training time is obtained by the KNN algorithm, while the SVM algorithm obtains the fastest testing time. The results of presidential predictions based on positive sentiment, namely candidate number 01 obtained a percentage of 67.98% while the number of positive sentiment predictions from candidate number 02 was 67.79%.","PeriodicalId":344981,"journal":{"name":"2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Sentiment Analysis of Indonesian Presidential Election 2019 with Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"Fiki Firmansyah, W. B. Zulfikar, D. Maylawati, Nunik Destria Arianti, L. Muliawaty, M. Septiadi, M. Ramdhani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm with the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm in predicting the results of the Indonesian presidential election 2019 based on sentiment analysis on social media (Twitter). The research methodology used includes several stages: preprocessing and weighting using TF-IDF. The SVM algorithm has the highest accuracy compared to the KNN algorithm. The average accuracy of SVM algorithm is 69.27, with the highest accuracy is 76.5%, while the average value of the KNN algorithm is 61.3% with the highest accuracy of 68.3%. The fastest training time is obtained by the KNN algorithm, while the SVM algorithm obtains the fastest testing time. The results of presidential predictions based on positive sentiment, namely candidate number 01 obtained a percentage of 67.98% while the number of positive sentiment predictions from candidate number 02 was 67.79%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 6th International Conference on Computing Engineering and Design (ICCED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCED51276.2020.9415767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是比较支持向量机(SVM)算法与k -最近邻(KNN)算法在基于社交媒体(Twitter)情绪分析的2019年印度尼西亚总统选举结果预测中的有效性。使用的研究方法包括几个阶段:预处理和使用TF-IDF加权。与KNN算法相比,SVM算法具有最高的准确率。SVM算法的平均准确率为69.27,最高准确率为76.5%;KNN算法的平均准确率为61.3%,最高准确率为68.3%。KNN算法获得最快的训练时间,SVM算法获得最快的测试时间。01号候选人的积极情绪预测结果为67.98%,02号候选人的积极情绪预测结果为67.79%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Sentiment Analysis of Indonesian Presidential Election 2019 with Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbor Algorithm
The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm with the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) algorithm in predicting the results of the Indonesian presidential election 2019 based on sentiment analysis on social media (Twitter). The research methodology used includes several stages: preprocessing and weighting using TF-IDF. The SVM algorithm has the highest accuracy compared to the KNN algorithm. The average accuracy of SVM algorithm is 69.27, with the highest accuracy is 76.5%, while the average value of the KNN algorithm is 61.3% with the highest accuracy of 68.3%. The fastest training time is obtained by the KNN algorithm, while the SVM algorithm obtains the fastest testing time. The results of presidential predictions based on positive sentiment, namely candidate number 01 obtained a percentage of 67.98% while the number of positive sentiment predictions from candidate number 02 was 67.79%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison Data Mining based on Optimization Algorithms in Receiving Electricity Subsidies Embracing Agile Development Principles in an Organization using The Legacy System: The Case of Bank XYZ in Indonesia Modelling and Optimization Containers Dwell-Time in Tanjung Perak Port Indonesia Consumer Acceptance in Grocery Shopping Mobile Applications Multi-Faces Recognition in Crowd Using Support Vector Machine on Histogram of Gradient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1