生物医学文献中作者身份的滥用

J. A. Teixeira da Silva
{"title":"生物医学文献中作者身份的滥用","authors":"J. A. Teixeira da Silva","doi":"10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ‘publish or perish’ culture has induced an unhealthy aspect of academic publishing in the biomedical sciences, namely of illegitimate authorship. Such a position can be obtained when an authorship slot is offered as a gift (e.g., to a sponsor, or researcher in a senior position), without their intellectual or scientific participation, or it can be hidden (ghost authorship), in which the paper (or parts thereof) is written by a third party (individual, or company). In a more industrialized setting, ghost authorship takes place via the sale of papers using “paper mills”, including of specific author slots (i.e., positions in a line of authors). While author-based persistent identifiers like ORCID, or authorship attribution schemes like CRediT, sound noble and offer some form of validation, those systems still operate on a culture of blind trust (in submitting authors). This paper debates a few of the authorship-related issues currently plaguing biomedical journals.","PeriodicalId":388483,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE ABUSE OF AUTHORSHIP IN THE BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE\",\"authors\":\"J. A. Teixeira da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.2.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ‘publish or perish’ culture has induced an unhealthy aspect of academic publishing in the biomedical sciences, namely of illegitimate authorship. Such a position can be obtained when an authorship slot is offered as a gift (e.g., to a sponsor, or researcher in a senior position), without their intellectual or scientific participation, or it can be hidden (ghost authorship), in which the paper (or parts thereof) is written by a third party (individual, or company). In a more industrialized setting, ghost authorship takes place via the sale of papers using “paper mills”, including of specific author slots (i.e., positions in a line of authors). While author-based persistent identifiers like ORCID, or authorship attribution schemes like CRediT, sound noble and offer some form of validation, those systems still operate on a culture of blind trust (in submitting authors). This paper debates a few of the authorship-related issues currently plaguing biomedical journals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":388483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.2.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2023.4.2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“要么发表,要么灭亡”的文化导致了生物医学学术出版的一个不健康方面,即非法作者。当作者身份是作为礼物(例如,给发起人或高级职位的研究人员)提供时,可以获得这样的位置,而不需要他们的智力或科学参与,或者可以隐藏(幽灵作者身份),其中论文(或其部分)由第三方(个人或公司)撰写。在工业化程度更高的环境中,代笔是通过“造纸厂”出售论文来实现的,包括特定的作者位置(即作者队列中的位置)。虽然基于作者的持久标识符(如ORCID)或作者归属方案(如CRediT)听起来很高尚,并提供了某种形式的验证,但这些系统仍然在盲目信任(提交作者)的文化中运行。本文讨论了目前困扰生物医学期刊的几个与作者身份有关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE ABUSE OF AUTHORSHIP IN THE BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE
The ‘publish or perish’ culture has induced an unhealthy aspect of academic publishing in the biomedical sciences, namely of illegitimate authorship. Such a position can be obtained when an authorship slot is offered as a gift (e.g., to a sponsor, or researcher in a senior position), without their intellectual or scientific participation, or it can be hidden (ghost authorship), in which the paper (or parts thereof) is written by a third party (individual, or company). In a more industrialized setting, ghost authorship takes place via the sale of papers using “paper mills”, including of specific author slots (i.e., positions in a line of authors). While author-based persistent identifiers like ORCID, or authorship attribution schemes like CRediT, sound noble and offer some form of validation, those systems still operate on a culture of blind trust (in submitting authors). This paper debates a few of the authorship-related issues currently plaguing biomedical journals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS FOR RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS TREATMENT: A HYPOTHESIS HYPERTROPHIC OSTEOARTHROPATHY IN A PATIENT WITH HETEROZYGOUS MUTATION IN THE SLCO2A1 GENE: A CASE REPORT MANUSCRIPTS WITH FAKE CHATGPT-CREATED REFERENCES: A CASE STUDY PREDATORY PUBLISHING AND WASTE OF RESOURCE MY LIFE AS AN EDITOR AND CONSULTANT OF MEDICAL JOURNALS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1