所谓的模糊控制的局限性

Phil Serchuk
{"title":"所谓的模糊控制的局限性","authors":"Phil Serchuk","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2005.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charles Elkan (1994) claimed that, despite the popularity of using fuzzy logic, it could only be used in controllers and would never be successfully used in expert systems. This claim forms the basis of Elkan's 'paradox' and relies on a distinction between fuzzy controllers and expert systems. Yet it is unclear whether this distinction even exists and if Elkan is justified in using it to support his claim. An examination of this distinction is undertaken where it is shown to be faulty and Elkan's 'paradox' is rejected. The correctness of using fuzzy logic to model different kinds of vagueness and uncertainty is then examined in an effort to determine the kinds of phenomena fuzzy logic can be successfully used to deal with.","PeriodicalId":340578,"journal":{"name":"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The alleged limitations of fuzzy control\",\"authors\":\"Phil Serchuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2005.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Charles Elkan (1994) claimed that, despite the popularity of using fuzzy logic, it could only be used in controllers and would never be successfully used in expert systems. This claim forms the basis of Elkan's 'paradox' and relies on a distinction between fuzzy controllers and expert systems. Yet it is unclear whether this distinction even exists and if Elkan is justified in using it to support his claim. An examination of this distinction is undertaken where it is shown to be faulty and Elkan's 'paradox' is rejected. The correctness of using fuzzy logic to model different kinds of vagueness and uncertainty is then examined in an effort to determine the kinds of phenomena fuzzy logic can be successfully used to deal with.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2005.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"35th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2005.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Charles Elkan(1994)声称,尽管使用模糊逻辑很受欢迎,但它只能用于控制器,永远不会成功地用于专家系统。这种说法形成了Elkan“悖论”的基础,并依赖于模糊控制器和专家系统之间的区别。然而,目前尚不清楚这种区别是否存在,以及埃尔坎是否有理由利用这种区别来支持他的主张。对这一区别的检验被证明是错误的,Elkan的“悖论”被拒绝了。然后检验了用模糊逻辑对不同类型的模糊性和不确定性进行建模的正确性,以确定模糊逻辑可以成功地用于处理哪些现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The alleged limitations of fuzzy control
Charles Elkan (1994) claimed that, despite the popularity of using fuzzy logic, it could only be used in controllers and would never be successfully used in expert systems. This claim forms the basis of Elkan's 'paradox' and relies on a distinction between fuzzy controllers and expert systems. Yet it is unclear whether this distinction even exists and if Elkan is justified in using it to support his claim. An examination of this distinction is undertaken where it is shown to be faulty and Elkan's 'paradox' is rejected. The correctness of using fuzzy logic to model different kinds of vagueness and uncertainty is then examined in an effort to determine the kinds of phenomena fuzzy logic can be successfully used to deal with.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Estimation of average multiple-valued logic circuit size using Monte Carlo simulation technique Implementation and evaluation of a fine-grain multiple-valued field programmable VLSI based on source-coupled logic Many-valued intuitionistic implication and inference closure in a bilattice-based logic Classes of fastest quaternary linearly independent transformations Partially ordered set with residuated t-norm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1