{"title":"它始于巴贝奇:计算机科学的起源,苏布拉塔·达斯古普塔","authors":"Jonathan P. Bowen","doi":"10.1080/17498430.2015.1036336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"will ‘show that some fairly esoteric Renaissance ideas nourished the seventeenth century climate that made Leibniz’s calculus possible’ (p 205). On the whole, this volume is a useful contribution to a large and growing literature. Readers not readily familiar with the contents of a university-level course in the calculus may find some of the material technically challenging, and those with reservations about the Kuhnian analysis of scientific change will likely find the historiographic orientation unsatisfying. I also found that Brown’s discussion tended to wander rather far afield—an impression heightened by the presence of six appendices that range over topics only very loosely connected to Brown’s main argument. Finally, the presence of numerous typographical errors through the text was occasionally distracting. Despite these shortcomings, the volume delivers a nuanced and technically sound account of the Leibnizian calculus and its intellectual context.","PeriodicalId":211442,"journal":{"name":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"It began with Babbage: the genesis of computer science, by Subrata Dasgupta\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan P. Bowen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17498430.2015.1036336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"will ‘show that some fairly esoteric Renaissance ideas nourished the seventeenth century climate that made Leibniz’s calculus possible’ (p 205). On the whole, this volume is a useful contribution to a large and growing literature. Readers not readily familiar with the contents of a university-level course in the calculus may find some of the material technically challenging, and those with reservations about the Kuhnian analysis of scientific change will likely find the historiographic orientation unsatisfying. I also found that Brown’s discussion tended to wander rather far afield—an impression heightened by the presence of six appendices that range over topics only very loosely connected to Brown’s main argument. Finally, the presence of numerous typographical errors through the text was occasionally distracting. Despite these shortcomings, the volume delivers a nuanced and technically sound account of the Leibnizian calculus and its intellectual context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2015.1036336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BSHM Bulletin: Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17498430.2015.1036336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
It began with Babbage: the genesis of computer science, by Subrata Dasgupta
will ‘show that some fairly esoteric Renaissance ideas nourished the seventeenth century climate that made Leibniz’s calculus possible’ (p 205). On the whole, this volume is a useful contribution to a large and growing literature. Readers not readily familiar with the contents of a university-level course in the calculus may find some of the material technically challenging, and those with reservations about the Kuhnian analysis of scientific change will likely find the historiographic orientation unsatisfying. I also found that Brown’s discussion tended to wander rather far afield—an impression heightened by the presence of six appendices that range over topics only very loosely connected to Brown’s main argument. Finally, the presence of numerous typographical errors through the text was occasionally distracting. Despite these shortcomings, the volume delivers a nuanced and technically sound account of the Leibnizian calculus and its intellectual context.