行政诉讼中的司法保护主体

R. O. Opalev
{"title":"行政诉讼中的司法保护主体","authors":"R. O. Opalev","doi":"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-18-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contains an analysis of topical issues of distinction between subject matters of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation. The author criticizes provisions of the theory and modern judicial practice, makes conclusions about the current situation and prospects for the development of doctrine, judicial practice on the indicated problem by relying on comparative legal and historical researches. In particular, the article provides arguments in favor of changing the approach to the distinction between civil and administrative cases that developed in the Soviet period, and points out the absence of grounds for applying this approach at the present time.","PeriodicalId":254727,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Subject of Judicial Protection in Administrative Proceedings\",\"authors\":\"R. O. Opalev\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-18-22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article contains an analysis of topical issues of distinction between subject matters of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation. The author criticizes provisions of the theory and modern judicial practice, makes conclusions about the current situation and prospects for the development of doctrine, judicial practice on the indicated problem by relying on comparative legal and historical researches. In particular, the article provides arguments in favor of changing the approach to the distinction between civil and administrative cases that developed in the Soviet period, and points out the absence of grounds for applying this approach at the present time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-18-22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrazh-Civil Procedure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-383x-2021-4-18-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了《俄罗斯联邦民事诉讼法》和《俄罗斯联邦行政司法诉讼法》主体事项区别的专题问题。笔者对该学说的规定和现代司法实践进行了批判,并通过比较法学和历史研究对该学说的发展现状和前景进行了总结,指出了司法实践中存在的问题。这篇文章特别提出了赞成改变苏联时期发展起来的区分民事和行政案件的方法的论点,并指出目前缺乏适用这种方法的理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Subject of Judicial Protection in Administrative Proceedings
The article contains an analysis of topical issues of distinction between subject matters of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Judicial Procedure of the Russian Federation. The author criticizes provisions of the theory and modern judicial practice, makes conclusions about the current situation and prospects for the development of doctrine, judicial practice on the indicated problem by relying on comparative legal and historical researches. In particular, the article provides arguments in favor of changing the approach to the distinction between civil and administrative cases that developed in the Soviet period, and points out the absence of grounds for applying this approach at the present time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abuse of Law in the Area of Insolvency (Bankruptcy) On the Need for the Unification of Provisions of the Institution of Parties to a Case in Procedural Branches of Russian Law Aims of the Civil Procedure in Russia and France: Common Features and Differences Problems of the Counter Claim Institution in an Arbitral Procedure Collective litigation in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1