{"title":"[讨论论坛医学伦理学。]B2。医生的誓言:还有效吗?对各种职业道德誓言文本的批判性观察]。","authors":"W U Eckart","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Topicality, expressiveness and universal validity of current ethical vows in medicine are compared critically. Instead of outmoded formula Pellegrino's and Thomasma's suggestion for a new and mainly at patient autonomy-oriented vow is favored.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 2","pages":"3 p. following 365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Discussion forum medical ethics. B2. Physician's oath: still current? Critical observations on various professional ethical oath texts].\",\"authors\":\"W U Eckart\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Topicality, expressiveness and universal validity of current ethical vows in medicine are compared critically. Instead of outmoded formula Pellegrino's and Thomasma's suggestion for a new and mainly at patient autonomy-oriented vow is favored.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\" 2\",\"pages\":\"3 p. following 365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Discussion forum medical ethics. B2. Physician's oath: still current? Critical observations on various professional ethical oath texts].
Topicality, expressiveness and universal validity of current ethical vows in medicine are compared critically. Instead of outmoded formula Pellegrino's and Thomasma's suggestion for a new and mainly at patient autonomy-oriented vow is favored.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
