电网数字频率测量方法的比较分析

A. Serov, Ekaterina A. Dolgacheva, A. Shatokhin, A. Novitskiy, S. Schlegel, D. Westermann
{"title":"电网数字频率测量方法的比较分析","authors":"A. Serov, Ekaterina A. Dolgacheva, A. Shatokhin, A. Novitskiy, S. Schlegel, D. Westermann","doi":"10.23919/SMAGRIMET48809.2020.9264019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, frequency measurement is one of the most popular tasks in power engineering. The voltage and current of real power networks are different from sinusoidal ones: there are harmonics, supraharmonics, noise and flicker. For this reason, the application of measurement methods designed to measure the frequency of a sinusoidal voltage results in larger measurement errors. This paper discusses two most popular frequency measurement methods applied in power engineering: zero crossing technique and a method based on the amplitude spectrum analysis. The paper provides a description of each method, indicates the main advantages and disadvantages, considers the features for the practical implementation. Analytical relations are obtained which allows to estimate the methodological error of all the methods under consideration. In the paper main modification directions for the considered methods are shown, aimed mainly at simplifying the implementation and reducing the methodological error. The influence of the parameters of the input signals, namely the sample time and the measurement time, on the frequency measurement error is considered. A comparative analysis of the methodological error of the considered methods for the cases of sinusoidal signal, polyharmonic signal and combined signals (sinusoidal signal and sinusoidal flicker) was made by simulation modeling in Matlab and Simulink software. The influence of supraharmonics on the measurement error for the case of considered methods is researched. The reliability of the obtained analytical relations is confirmed by comparison of the results of analytical and simulation modeling at check points.","PeriodicalId":272673,"journal":{"name":"2020 3rd International Colloquium on Intelligent Grid Metrology (SMAGRIMET)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Digital Frequency Measurement Methods for Power Networks\",\"authors\":\"A. Serov, Ekaterina A. Dolgacheva, A. Shatokhin, A. Novitskiy, S. Schlegel, D. Westermann\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/SMAGRIMET48809.2020.9264019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, frequency measurement is one of the most popular tasks in power engineering. The voltage and current of real power networks are different from sinusoidal ones: there are harmonics, supraharmonics, noise and flicker. For this reason, the application of measurement methods designed to measure the frequency of a sinusoidal voltage results in larger measurement errors. This paper discusses two most popular frequency measurement methods applied in power engineering: zero crossing technique and a method based on the amplitude spectrum analysis. The paper provides a description of each method, indicates the main advantages and disadvantages, considers the features for the practical implementation. Analytical relations are obtained which allows to estimate the methodological error of all the methods under consideration. In the paper main modification directions for the considered methods are shown, aimed mainly at simplifying the implementation and reducing the methodological error. The influence of the parameters of the input signals, namely the sample time and the measurement time, on the frequency measurement error is considered. A comparative analysis of the methodological error of the considered methods for the cases of sinusoidal signal, polyharmonic signal and combined signals (sinusoidal signal and sinusoidal flicker) was made by simulation modeling in Matlab and Simulink software. The influence of supraharmonics on the measurement error for the case of considered methods is researched. The reliability of the obtained analytical relations is confirmed by comparison of the results of analytical and simulation modeling at check points.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272673,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 3rd International Colloquium on Intelligent Grid Metrology (SMAGRIMET)\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 3rd International Colloquium on Intelligent Grid Metrology (SMAGRIMET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/SMAGRIMET48809.2020.9264019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 3rd International Colloquium on Intelligent Grid Metrology (SMAGRIMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/SMAGRIMET48809.2020.9264019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目前,频率测量是电力工程中最热门的任务之一。实际电网的电压和电流与正弦电网不同,存在谐波、超谐波、噪声和闪变。由于这个原因,设计用于测量正弦电压频率的测量方法的应用导致较大的测量误差。本文讨论了电力工程中常用的两种频率测量方法:过零技术和基于幅谱分析的频率测量方法。本文对每种方法进行了描述,指出了其主要优点和缺点,并考虑了其具体实现的特点。得到了分析关系,从而可以估计所考虑的所有方法的方法学误差。本文指出了所考虑的方法的主要修改方向,主要是为了简化实现和减少方法误差。考虑了输入信号的参数,即采样时间和测量时间对频率测量误差的影响。在Matlab和Simulink软件中进行仿真建模,对比分析了正弦信号、多谐信号和组合信号(正弦信号和正弦闪烁)情况下所考虑方法的方法学误差。研究了不同测量方法下超谐波对测量误差的影响。通过对各测点的解析和仿真建模结果的比较,验证了所得解析关系的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of Digital Frequency Measurement Methods for Power Networks
Currently, frequency measurement is one of the most popular tasks in power engineering. The voltage and current of real power networks are different from sinusoidal ones: there are harmonics, supraharmonics, noise and flicker. For this reason, the application of measurement methods designed to measure the frequency of a sinusoidal voltage results in larger measurement errors. This paper discusses two most popular frequency measurement methods applied in power engineering: zero crossing technique and a method based on the amplitude spectrum analysis. The paper provides a description of each method, indicates the main advantages and disadvantages, considers the features for the practical implementation. Analytical relations are obtained which allows to estimate the methodological error of all the methods under consideration. In the paper main modification directions for the considered methods are shown, aimed mainly at simplifying the implementation and reducing the methodological error. The influence of the parameters of the input signals, namely the sample time and the measurement time, on the frequency measurement error is considered. A comparative analysis of the methodological error of the considered methods for the cases of sinusoidal signal, polyharmonic signal and combined signals (sinusoidal signal and sinusoidal flicker) was made by simulation modeling in Matlab and Simulink software. The influence of supraharmonics on the measurement error for the case of considered methods is researched. The reliability of the obtained analytical relations is confirmed by comparison of the results of analytical and simulation modeling at check points.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review of Machine Learning Applications in Electricity Market Studies Proceedings of 2020 3rd International Colloquium on Intelligent Grid Metrology (SMAGRIMET 2020) A Review of Phasor Estimation Algorithms On Line Electromechanical Oscillations Detection in Transmission Network with Synchrophasor Power transformer sound pressure level spectra versus electrical current spectra: experimental findings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1