{"title":"流动性监管和最后贷款人","authors":"J. Rochet","doi":"10.4324/9780203126981-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent subprime crisis has brought back to light proposals to regulate banks’ liquidity as a complement to solvency regulations. Based on recent academic research, I suggest that liquidity regulations might indeed be a way to limit the pressure on Central Banks in favour of liquidity injections during crisis periods. Another crucial question is the allocation of responsibilities between the Central Bank, the Banking Supervisors and the Treasury in the management of banking crises.","PeriodicalId":293022,"journal":{"name":"Financial Stability Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liquidity regulation and the lender of last resort\",\"authors\":\"J. Rochet\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203126981-16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The recent subprime crisis has brought back to light proposals to regulate banks’ liquidity as a complement to solvency regulations. Based on recent academic research, I suggest that liquidity regulations might indeed be a way to limit the pressure on Central Banks in favour of liquidity injections during crisis periods. Another crucial question is the allocation of responsibilities between the Central Bank, the Banking Supervisors and the Treasury in the management of banking crises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Stability Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"51\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Stability Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126981-16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Stability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126981-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Liquidity regulation and the lender of last resort
The recent subprime crisis has brought back to light proposals to regulate banks’ liquidity as a complement to solvency regulations. Based on recent academic research, I suggest that liquidity regulations might indeed be a way to limit the pressure on Central Banks in favour of liquidity injections during crisis periods. Another crucial question is the allocation of responsibilities between the Central Bank, the Banking Supervisors and the Treasury in the management of banking crises.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
