“不是所有的流浪者都迷路了。”使用生态系统指标检查迁移工程学生的结果

S. Lord, M. Ohland, R. Layton, M. Camacho
{"title":"“不是所有的流浪者都迷路了。”使用生态系统指标检查迁移工程学生的结果","authors":"S. Lord, M. Ohland, R. Layton, M. Camacho","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How successful are undergraduate students who begin in another major and migrate into engineering disciplines after matriculation? In this work in progress, we present quantitative data on outcomes for engineering migrators disaggregated by discipline, race/ethnicity, and sex. The study includes over 73,000 engineering students from nine U.S. universities, including first-time-in-college and transfer students who ever majored in the most common engineering disciplines: Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering. Adopting an ecosystem mindset, we have developed metrics including the graduation rate of migrators and “migration yield” to uncover dynamic information, not afforded by the conventional pipeline model, about the successes of students who migrate among the top five engineering disciplines. Our data show that the graduation rates of migrators are typically higher than those of starters for all engineering majors studied. Migration yield varies by race/ethnicity-sex as well as discipline. Migration yield for Chemical, Electrical, Industrial and Mechanical Engineering shows a sex-based effect, whereas Civil shows a race/ethnicity-based effect.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Not all those who wander are lost.” Examining outcomes for migrating engineering students using ecosystem metrics\",\"authors\":\"S. Lord, M. Ohland, R. Layton, M. Camacho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How successful are undergraduate students who begin in another major and migrate into engineering disciplines after matriculation? In this work in progress, we present quantitative data on outcomes for engineering migrators disaggregated by discipline, race/ethnicity, and sex. The study includes over 73,000 engineering students from nine U.S. universities, including first-time-in-college and transfer students who ever majored in the most common engineering disciplines: Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering. Adopting an ecosystem mindset, we have developed metrics including the graduation rate of migrators and “migration yield” to uncover dynamic information, not afforded by the conventional pipeline model, about the successes of students who migrate among the top five engineering disciplines. Our data show that the graduation rates of migrators are typically higher than those of starters for all engineering majors studied. Migration yield varies by race/ethnicity-sex as well as discipline. Migration yield for Chemical, Electrical, Industrial and Mechanical Engineering shows a sex-based effect, whereas Civil shows a race/ethnicity-based effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从其他专业开始并在入学后转到工程学科的本科生有多成功?在这项正在进行的工作中,我们提供了按学科、种族/民族和性别分类的工程移民结果的定量数据。这项研究包括来自美国九所大学的73,000多名工程专业的学生,包括第一次上大学的学生和转校生,他们的专业是最常见的工程学科:化学、土木、电气、工业和机械工程。采用生态系统思维,我们开发了包括迁移者毕业率和“迁移产量”在内的指标,以揭示传统管道模型无法提供的动态信息,这些信息是关于在五大工程学科之间迁移的学生的成功情况。我们的数据显示,在所有研究的工程专业中,移民的毕业率通常高于初学者。移民人数因种族、民族、性别和纪律而异。化学、电气、工业和机械工程的移民率表现出基于性别的影响,而土木工程则表现出基于种族/民族的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Not all those who wander are lost.” Examining outcomes for migrating engineering students using ecosystem metrics
How successful are undergraduate students who begin in another major and migrate into engineering disciplines after matriculation? In this work in progress, we present quantitative data on outcomes for engineering migrators disaggregated by discipline, race/ethnicity, and sex. The study includes over 73,000 engineering students from nine U.S. universities, including first-time-in-college and transfer students who ever majored in the most common engineering disciplines: Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering. Adopting an ecosystem mindset, we have developed metrics including the graduation rate of migrators and “migration yield” to uncover dynamic information, not afforded by the conventional pipeline model, about the successes of students who migrate among the top five engineering disciplines. Our data show that the graduation rates of migrators are typically higher than those of starters for all engineering majors studied. Migration yield varies by race/ethnicity-sex as well as discipline. Migration yield for Chemical, Electrical, Industrial and Mechanical Engineering shows a sex-based effect, whereas Civil shows a race/ethnicity-based effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DCLab: A Web-based System for Digital Logic Experiment Teaching Who I Am Becoming, Now: Toward a Computer Science Professional Identity Instrument Practical Education in IoT through Collaborative Work on Open-Source Projects with Industry and Entrepreneurial Organizations A multidimensional ELO model for matching learning objects Investigating the ways in which Student Agency develops through Engagement with Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1