个性化风险评估的个性化风险沟通:从在线预期寿命计算器对六种死亡风险措施的知识和动机进行现实世界评估

D. Manuel, K. Abdulaziz, R. Perez, S. Beach, C. Bennett
{"title":"个性化风险评估的个性化风险沟通:从在线预期寿命计算器对六种死亡风险措施的知识和动机进行现实世界评估","authors":"D. Manuel, K. Abdulaziz, R. Perez, S. Beach, C. Bennett","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2016.1255632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the clinical setting, previous studies have shown personalized risk assessment and communication improves risk perception and motivation. We evaluated an online health calculator that estimated and presented six different measures of life expectancy/mortality based on a person’s sociodemographic and health behavior profile. Immediately after receiving calculator results, participants were invited to complete an online survey that asked how informative and motivating they found each risk measure, whether they would share their results and whether the calculator provided information they need to make lifestyle changes. Over 80% of the 317 survey respondents found at least one of six healthy living measures highly informative and motivating, but there was moderate heterogeneity regarding which measures respondents found most informative and motivating. Overall, health age was most informative and life expectancy most motivating. Approximately 40% of respondents would share the results with their clinician (44%) or social networks (38%), although the information they would share was often different from what they found informative or motivational. Online personalized risk assessment allows for a more personalized communication compared to historic paper-based risk assessment to maximize knowledge and motivation, and people should be provided a range of risk communication measures that reflect different risk perspectives.","PeriodicalId":440622,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health and Social Care","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Personalized risk communication for personalized risk assessment: Real world assessment of knowledge and motivation for six mortality risk measures from an online life expectancy calculator\",\"authors\":\"D. Manuel, K. Abdulaziz, R. Perez, S. Beach, C. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538157.2016.1255632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In the clinical setting, previous studies have shown personalized risk assessment and communication improves risk perception and motivation. We evaluated an online health calculator that estimated and presented six different measures of life expectancy/mortality based on a person’s sociodemographic and health behavior profile. Immediately after receiving calculator results, participants were invited to complete an online survey that asked how informative and motivating they found each risk measure, whether they would share their results and whether the calculator provided information they need to make lifestyle changes. Over 80% of the 317 survey respondents found at least one of six healthy living measures highly informative and motivating, but there was moderate heterogeneity regarding which measures respondents found most informative and motivating. Overall, health age was most informative and life expectancy most motivating. Approximately 40% of respondents would share the results with their clinician (44%) or social networks (38%), although the information they would share was often different from what they found informative or motivational. Online personalized risk assessment allows for a more personalized communication compared to historic paper-based risk assessment to maximize knowledge and motivation, and people should be provided a range of risk communication measures that reflect different risk perspectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics for Health and Social Care\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics for Health and Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2016.1255632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2016.1255632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在临床环境中,先前的研究表明,个性化的风险评估和沟通可以提高风险感知和动机。我们评估了一个在线健康计算器,该计算器根据一个人的社会人口统计和健康行为概况估计并呈现了六种不同的预期寿命/死亡率指标。在收到计算器的结果后,参与者立即被邀请完成一项在线调查,询问他们对每个风险测量的信息和激励程度,他们是否会分享他们的结果,以及计算器是否提供了他们改变生活方式所需的信息。在317名受访者中,超过80%的人认为六项健康生活措施中至少有一项具有高度的信息和激励作用,但在哪些措施被调查者认为最具信息和激励作用方面存在适度的异质性。总体而言,健康年龄最能提供信息,预期寿命最能激励人。大约40%的受访者会与他们的临床医生(44%)或社交网络(38%)分享结果,尽管他们分享的信息往往与他们认为有用或有动机的信息不同。与传统的纸质风险评估相比,在线个性化风险评估允许更个性化的沟通,以最大限度地提高知识和动机,并且应该向人们提供一系列反映不同风险观点的风险沟通措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Personalized risk communication for personalized risk assessment: Real world assessment of knowledge and motivation for six mortality risk measures from an online life expectancy calculator
ABSTRACT In the clinical setting, previous studies have shown personalized risk assessment and communication improves risk perception and motivation. We evaluated an online health calculator that estimated and presented six different measures of life expectancy/mortality based on a person’s sociodemographic and health behavior profile. Immediately after receiving calculator results, participants were invited to complete an online survey that asked how informative and motivating they found each risk measure, whether they would share their results and whether the calculator provided information they need to make lifestyle changes. Over 80% of the 317 survey respondents found at least one of six healthy living measures highly informative and motivating, but there was moderate heterogeneity regarding which measures respondents found most informative and motivating. Overall, health age was most informative and life expectancy most motivating. Approximately 40% of respondents would share the results with their clinician (44%) or social networks (38%), although the information they would share was often different from what they found informative or motivational. Online personalized risk assessment allows for a more personalized communication compared to historic paper-based risk assessment to maximize knowledge and motivation, and people should be provided a range of risk communication measures that reflect different risk perspectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Studying wearable health technology in the workplace using the Behavior Change Wheel: a systematic literature review and content analysis Perceptions of patients and nurses regarding the use of wearables in inpatient settings: a mixed methods study A focus group study of older adults’ perceptions and preferences towards web-based physical activity interventions Developing and testing models to predict mortality in the general population Understanding the satisfaction and continuance intention of knowledge contribution by health professionals in online health communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1