对2009年流动法院法案的批判性评价:流动法院如何破坏孟加拉国的司法分离和其他宪法原则

Anwara Begum Tamanna
{"title":"对2009年流动法院法案的批判性评价:流动法院如何破坏孟加拉国的司法分离和其他宪法原则","authors":"Anwara Begum Tamanna","doi":"10.24203/ajhss.v11i1.7164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Separation of power is a key for the independence of people. Though this principle has not been accepted by the framer of constitution of Bangladesh. Nevertheless separation of judiciary is adopted by the maker of constitution.  Judiciary is a place to restore the claims of the people of a country.  But it cannot make people happy if it is not independent. The principle of separation of judiciary has been violated by various approaches.  One of them is Mobile court. Mobile court is a forum which goes to the threshold of public in order to give prompt relief. It has reversed the general rules of judicial system. Though this fact claims appreciation for delivering justice. But it has been criticized as it is conducted by executive. This paper shows how mobile court infringed article 22 of constitution.  It also shows how other principle of constitution is violated. Finally it gives some suggestion for the improvement of the situation.","PeriodicalId":184745,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Evaluation of Mobile Court Act 2009: How Mobile Court Demolishes Separation of Judiciary and Other Constitutional Principles of Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Anwara Begum Tamanna\",\"doi\":\"10.24203/ajhss.v11i1.7164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Separation of power is a key for the independence of people. Though this principle has not been accepted by the framer of constitution of Bangladesh. Nevertheless separation of judiciary is adopted by the maker of constitution.  Judiciary is a place to restore the claims of the people of a country.  But it cannot make people happy if it is not independent. The principle of separation of judiciary has been violated by various approaches.  One of them is Mobile court. Mobile court is a forum which goes to the threshold of public in order to give prompt relief. It has reversed the general rules of judicial system. Though this fact claims appreciation for delivering justice. But it has been criticized as it is conducted by executive. This paper shows how mobile court infringed article 22 of constitution.  It also shows how other principle of constitution is violated. Finally it gives some suggestion for the improvement of the situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24203/ajhss.v11i1.7164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24203/ajhss.v11i1.7164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三权分立是人民独立的关键。尽管这一原则尚未被孟加拉国宪法制定者所接受。尽管如此,宪法制定者还是采用了司法分立。司法机关是恢复一个国家人民权利要求的地方。但是,如果它不独立,它就不能使人们快乐。司法分立原则被各种方式所违背。其中之一是移动法庭。流动法院是一种为了及时救济而走向公众门槛的法庭。它颠覆了司法系统的一般规则。尽管这一事实值得赞赏,因为它伸张了正义。但由于它是由高管进行的,因此受到了批评。本文论述了流动法院如何违反宪法第22条。这也说明了其他宪法原则是如何被违反的。最后提出了改善这一现状的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Evaluation of Mobile Court Act 2009: How Mobile Court Demolishes Separation of Judiciary and Other Constitutional Principles of Bangladesh
Separation of power is a key for the independence of people. Though this principle has not been accepted by the framer of constitution of Bangladesh. Nevertheless separation of judiciary is adopted by the maker of constitution.  Judiciary is a place to restore the claims of the people of a country.  But it cannot make people happy if it is not independent. The principle of separation of judiciary has been violated by various approaches.  One of them is Mobile court. Mobile court is a forum which goes to the threshold of public in order to give prompt relief. It has reversed the general rules of judicial system. Though this fact claims appreciation for delivering justice. But it has been criticized as it is conducted by executive. This paper shows how mobile court infringed article 22 of constitution.  It also shows how other principle of constitution is violated. Finally it gives some suggestion for the improvement of the situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Psychological Problems of families of Children with Cerebral Palsy: A study applied to the Palestine Future Foundation in the Gaza Strip The Rise of Divorce Rate in Bangladesh: Excessive Dower is Major Cause among Muslim Wives Initiating Divorce Covid-19 and E-wallet usage intention in Kyrgyzstan Smallholder Tomato Production in Mwanza Region- A Technical Efficiency Analysis Approach. The Role of Economic Empowerment Services at the Ministry of Social Development in Improving the Quality of Life for the Poor Palestinians in the Gaza Strip
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1