{"title":"De Amicitia","authors":"R. Lodge","doi":"10.1086/intejethi.47.2.2989336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IT IS hard to define friendship, to delimit it to this or that sharply outlined class of things or feelings or activities. Aristotle, past master of logical technique, in defining it as a \"moral virtue,\" placed it among the activities with the distinctive characteristic of being participated in by two or more persons in common. Persons who live together, who participate in the same life-activities, are friends. This is in accordance with common sense. But Aristotle goes further, and interprets the situation in the light of his own philosophical interests. He recognizes three typically distinct forms of activity in which men participate in common. There is pleasure, pursued by all who are young or unreflective. There is profit, pursued by older or cooler heads, as in business. And there is philosophy, pursued by the reflective, the rational, and the wise. Associations based upon pleasure, partnerships based upon profit, are not entirely genuine forms of friendship. Each partner is out for all he can get, and such associations are essentially competitive, grasping, selfish. If either can get more out of the association than his partner, he will; and if either thinks he can get more out of a different association, he will dissolve his former partnership. Youth and the glamor of simple illusions may conceal, for a time, the essential disunion. But in the end the principle of individualism, \"each for self, and none for all,\" works itself out; and it becomes recognized that such associations contain within themselves the seeds of their own dissolution. Such pseudo-friendships are essentially accidental. True friendship is based upon reason-the highest of human faculties. Truth is inexhaustible, and its pursuit brings value to all who care for the things of the mind. The discovery and contemplation of the secrets of nature are essentially co-operative, non-competitive. Thought alone is pure, and a society of human beings, devoted to the pursuit of truth, rests upon a basis which can never be contaminated by envy, hatred, malice, and a narrow selfishness. With the growth of years such associations grow stronger, more intimate, more divine, more nearly like the life of God, \"pure thought thinking itself.\" Such a society was the Pythagorean brotherhood, wherein lovers of wisdom were first called \"philoso-","PeriodicalId":346392,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1937-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/intejethi.47.2.2989336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

很难给友谊下定义,也很难把它界定为这样或那样的事物、感情或活动。亚里士多德,过去的逻辑技巧大师,在将其定义为“道德美德”时,将其置于具有两个或两个以上共同参与的独特特征的活动中。生活在一起,参加同样的生活活动的人是朋友。这是符合常识的。但亚里士多德走得更远,根据他自己的哲学兴趣来解释这种情况。他认识到人们共同参与的三种典型的截然不同的活动形式。有一种快乐,所有的年轻人或不深思熟虑的人都在追求。就像在商业中一样,年长或头脑冷静的人追求利润。还有一种哲学,是由深思者、理性者和智者追求的。以快乐为基础的交往,以利益为基础的伙伴关系,都不完全是真正的友谊。每一个合作伙伴都是为了得到他所能得到的一切,这种关系本质上是竞争的,贪婪的,自私的。如果任何一方能从合作中获得比他的伙伴更多的东西,他就会这么做;如果其中任何一方认为他可以从另一个协会中获得更多,他将解散他以前的合作伙伴关系。青春和单纯幻想的魅力可能暂时掩盖了本质上的分裂。但最终,个人主义的原则——“人人为自己,无人为所有人”——发挥了作用;人们认识到,这种联系本身包含着导致其自身解体的种子。这种虚假的友谊本质上是偶然的。真正的友谊建立在理性的基础上——理性是人类最高的才能。真理是取之不尽的,对它的追求给所有关心精神事物的人带来价值。发现和思考自然的秘密本质上是合作的,而不是竞争的。只有思想才是纯洁的,一个致力于追求真理的人类社会是建立在一个永远不会被嫉妒、仇恨、恶意和狭隘的自私所污染的基础上的。随着年龄的增长,这种联系变得更强烈,更亲密,更神圣,更像上帝的生活,“纯粹的思想思想本身。”这样的社会就是毕达哥拉斯式的兄弟会,在那里,热爱智慧的人最初被称为“哲学家”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
De Amicitia
IT IS hard to define friendship, to delimit it to this or that sharply outlined class of things or feelings or activities. Aristotle, past master of logical technique, in defining it as a "moral virtue," placed it among the activities with the distinctive characteristic of being participated in by two or more persons in common. Persons who live together, who participate in the same life-activities, are friends. This is in accordance with common sense. But Aristotle goes further, and interprets the situation in the light of his own philosophical interests. He recognizes three typically distinct forms of activity in which men participate in common. There is pleasure, pursued by all who are young or unreflective. There is profit, pursued by older or cooler heads, as in business. And there is philosophy, pursued by the reflective, the rational, and the wise. Associations based upon pleasure, partnerships based upon profit, are not entirely genuine forms of friendship. Each partner is out for all he can get, and such associations are essentially competitive, grasping, selfish. If either can get more out of the association than his partner, he will; and if either thinks he can get more out of a different association, he will dissolve his former partnership. Youth and the glamor of simple illusions may conceal, for a time, the essential disunion. But in the end the principle of individualism, "each for self, and none for all," works itself out; and it becomes recognized that such associations contain within themselves the seeds of their own dissolution. Such pseudo-friendships are essentially accidental. True friendship is based upon reason-the highest of human faculties. Truth is inexhaustible, and its pursuit brings value to all who care for the things of the mind. The discovery and contemplation of the secrets of nature are essentially co-operative, non-competitive. Thought alone is pure, and a society of human beings, devoted to the pursuit of truth, rests upon a basis which can never be contaminated by envy, hatred, malice, and a narrow selfishness. With the growth of years such associations grow stronger, more intimate, more divine, more nearly like the life of God, "pure thought thinking itself." Such a society was the Pythagorean brotherhood, wherein lovers of wisdom were first called "philoso-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mastery learning of toxicology life support skills by nurses and doctors, utilizing simulation technology in Nepal Role of Forensic Nurses in the mortuary and postmortem examination An overview of sexual assault cases in Bangladesh Risks, hazards and safety in mortuaries Nut case in ER: ISTOLS Toxidromal Approach by Indian Society of Toxicology in managing botanical emergencies due to Areca Catechu - Betel Nuts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1