驯化儿童:《怀尔德费尔庄园的房客》中母亲对遗传话语的回应

Elizabeth Pellerito
{"title":"驯化儿童:《怀尔德费尔庄园的房客》中母亲对遗传话语的回应","authors":"Elizabeth Pellerito","doi":"10.7202/1026009AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the early nineteenth century connections between human, animal and plant by placing Erasmus Darwin’s The Botanic Garden (1791) and The Temple of Nature (1803) in conversation with Anne Bronte’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall (1848). I argue that the Romantic versions of heredity described in Darwin’s poetry tended to reinscribe traditional gender roles. Bronte’s Tenant, on the other hand, revises earlier notions of heredity and motherhood via Helen Huntingdon, the wife of an alcoholic who tries to prevent her son from activating his genetic taint. By reconfiguring the supposedly natural connections between patriarchal inheritance of the land on the one hand and biological traits on the other, and by reclaiming and reinscribing popular metaphors of breeding, Anne Bronte’s female protagonist creates and attempts to implement a maternalist version of heredity while remaining entrenched within the nineteenth-century cult of motherhood. Whereas the Romantic and romanticized poetry of Erasmus Darwin and his contemporaries’ approach to natural history bestowed human characteristics on plants in order to make their reproduction more comprehensible, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall does the opposite. Without a satisfactory framework in place to express the anxieties surrounding human heredity, Bronte turns the tables on the metaphor and applies the language of breeding and agriculture to a human child. In doing so, she creates an alternate version of heredity based on maternal strength and power rather than one predicated upon patriarchal structures of kinship and economic inheritance.","PeriodicalId":429435,"journal":{"name":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Domesticating the Child: Maternal Responses to Hereditary Discourse in The Tenant of Wildfell Hall\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Pellerito\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1026009AR\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the early nineteenth century connections between human, animal and plant by placing Erasmus Darwin’s The Botanic Garden (1791) and The Temple of Nature (1803) in conversation with Anne Bronte’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall (1848). I argue that the Romantic versions of heredity described in Darwin’s poetry tended to reinscribe traditional gender roles. Bronte’s Tenant, on the other hand, revises earlier notions of heredity and motherhood via Helen Huntingdon, the wife of an alcoholic who tries to prevent her son from activating his genetic taint. By reconfiguring the supposedly natural connections between patriarchal inheritance of the land on the one hand and biological traits on the other, and by reclaiming and reinscribing popular metaphors of breeding, Anne Bronte’s female protagonist creates and attempts to implement a maternalist version of heredity while remaining entrenched within the nineteenth-century cult of motherhood. Whereas the Romantic and romanticized poetry of Erasmus Darwin and his contemporaries’ approach to natural history bestowed human characteristics on plants in order to make their reproduction more comprehensible, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall does the opposite. Without a satisfactory framework in place to express the anxieties surrounding human heredity, Bronte turns the tables on the metaphor and applies the language of breeding and agriculture to a human child. In doing so, she creates an alternate version of heredity based on maternal strength and power rather than one predicated upon patriarchal structures of kinship and economic inheritance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1026009AR\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1026009AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过将伊拉斯谟·达尔文的《植物园》(1791年)和《自然神庙》(1803年)与安妮·勃朗特的《怀尔德费尔大厅的房客》(1848年)对照,考察了19世纪早期人类、动物和植物之间的联系。我认为达尔文诗歌中描述的遗传的浪漫主义版本倾向于重新定义传统的性别角色。另一方面,勃朗特的《房客》通过海伦·亨廷顿(Helen huntington)修改了早期关于遗传和母性的概念,海伦是一个酒鬼的妻子,她试图阻止儿子激活他的遗传污点。通过重新配置土地的父权继承与生物特征之间的所谓自然联系,通过重新利用和重新定义流行的繁殖隐喻,安妮·勃朗特的女主人公创造并试图实现一种母亲主义版本的遗传,同时保持在19世纪对母性的崇拜中根深蒂固。伊拉斯谟·达尔文(Erasmus Darwin)的浪漫主义和浪漫化的诗歌,以及他同时代的自然历史研究方法,赋予了植物人类的特征,以使它们的繁殖更容易理解,而《怀尔德费尔庄园的房客》则恰恰相反。没有一个令人满意的框架来表达围绕人类遗传的焦虑,勃朗特扭转了隐喻的局面,将繁殖和农业的语言应用到人类的孩子身上。在这样做的过程中,她创造了一种基于母亲力量和权力的替代版本的遗传,而不是基于亲属关系和经济继承的父权结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Domesticating the Child: Maternal Responses to Hereditary Discourse in The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
This article examines the early nineteenth century connections between human, animal and plant by placing Erasmus Darwin’s The Botanic Garden (1791) and The Temple of Nature (1803) in conversation with Anne Bronte’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall (1848). I argue that the Romantic versions of heredity described in Darwin’s poetry tended to reinscribe traditional gender roles. Bronte’s Tenant, on the other hand, revises earlier notions of heredity and motherhood via Helen Huntingdon, the wife of an alcoholic who tries to prevent her son from activating his genetic taint. By reconfiguring the supposedly natural connections between patriarchal inheritance of the land on the one hand and biological traits on the other, and by reclaiming and reinscribing popular metaphors of breeding, Anne Bronte’s female protagonist creates and attempts to implement a maternalist version of heredity while remaining entrenched within the nineteenth-century cult of motherhood. Whereas the Romantic and romanticized poetry of Erasmus Darwin and his contemporaries’ approach to natural history bestowed human characteristics on plants in order to make their reproduction more comprehensible, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall does the opposite. Without a satisfactory framework in place to express the anxieties surrounding human heredity, Bronte turns the tables on the metaphor and applies the language of breeding and agriculture to a human child. In doing so, she creates an alternate version of heredity based on maternal strength and power rather than one predicated upon patriarchal structures of kinship and economic inheritance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epic Poetry and the Origins of Evolutionary Theory Maria LaMonaca. Masked Atheism: Catholicism and the Secular Victorian Home. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press, 2008. ISBN: 978-0814210840. Price: US$44.95 Mary Roberts. Intimate Outsiders: The Harem in Ottoman and Orientalist Art and Travel Literature. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2008. ISBN: 978-0822339670. Price: US$23.95 Adam Potkay. The Story of Joy: From the Bible to Late Romanticism, Cambridge University Press, 2007. ISBN-13: 9780521879118. Price: $99.00 Alexander Schlutz. Mind’s World: Imagination and Subjectivity from Descartes to Romanticism. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 2009. ISBN 9780295988931. Price: US$30Alexander Schlutz. Mind’s World: Imagination and Subjectivity from Descartes to Romanticism. Seattle and London: Univ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1