局部拓扑在故障诊断中的作用

B. Holbert, S. Tati, S. Silvestri, T. L. Porta, A. Swami
{"title":"局部拓扑在故障诊断中的作用","authors":"B. Holbert, S. Tati, S. Silvestri, T. L. Porta, A. Swami","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2013.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network components may experience faults for a variety of reasons, but it may not be immediately obvious which component failed. Fault diagnosis algorithms are required to localize failures and thereby enable the recovery process. Most current state of the art fault diagnosis algorithms assume full knowledge of the network topology, which may not be available in real scenarios. In this paper we examine the performance of one of these fault diagnosis algorithms, namely Max-Coverage (MC), when the topology is only partially known. We introduce a simple extension, called the Virtual Topology (VT), to correctly identify faults when a failure occurs in an unobserved component. We compare the performance of MC under partial topology knowledge with and without this extension to show that VT significantly improves correct diagnosis, but at the cost of a high number of false positives. Moreover, we demonstrate that correctly inferring areas of the unobserved network substantially mitigates the drawbacks associated with using VT.","PeriodicalId":379382,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2013 - 2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Partial Topology on Fault Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"B. Holbert, S. Tati, S. Silvestri, T. L. Porta, A. Swami\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.2013.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network components may experience faults for a variety of reasons, but it may not be immediately obvious which component failed. Fault diagnosis algorithms are required to localize failures and thereby enable the recovery process. Most current state of the art fault diagnosis algorithms assume full knowledge of the network topology, which may not be available in real scenarios. In this paper we examine the performance of one of these fault diagnosis algorithms, namely Max-Coverage (MC), when the topology is only partially known. We introduce a simple extension, called the Virtual Topology (VT), to correctly identify faults when a failure occurs in an unobserved component. We compare the performance of MC under partial topology knowledge with and without this extension to show that VT significantly improves correct diagnosis, but at the cost of a high number of false positives. Moreover, we demonstrate that correctly inferring areas of the unobserved network substantially mitigates the drawbacks associated with using VT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILCOM 2013 - 2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILCOM 2013 - 2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2013.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2013 - 2013 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2013.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

网络组件可能由于各种原因出现故障,但可能无法立即看出是哪个组件发生了故障。需要故障诊断算法来定位故障,从而使恢复过程顺利进行。目前大多数的故障诊断算法都假定充分了解网络拓扑结构,这在实际场景中可能无法实现。在本文中,我们研究了其中一种故障诊断算法,即最大覆盖(MC),当拓扑结构仅部分已知时的性能。我们引入一个简单的扩展,称为虚拟拓扑(Virtual Topology, VT),用于在未观察到的组件中发生故障时正确识别故障。我们比较了部分拓扑知识下有和没有这个扩展的MC的性能,表明VT显著提高了正确诊断,但代价是大量的假阳性。此外,我们证明了正确推断未观察到的网络的区域大大减轻了与使用VT相关的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Partial Topology on Fault Diagnosis
Network components may experience faults for a variety of reasons, but it may not be immediately obvious which component failed. Fault diagnosis algorithms are required to localize failures and thereby enable the recovery process. Most current state of the art fault diagnosis algorithms assume full knowledge of the network topology, which may not be available in real scenarios. In this paper we examine the performance of one of these fault diagnosis algorithms, namely Max-Coverage (MC), when the topology is only partially known. We introduce a simple extension, called the Virtual Topology (VT), to correctly identify faults when a failure occurs in an unobserved component. We compare the performance of MC under partial topology knowledge with and without this extension to show that VT significantly improves correct diagnosis, but at the cost of a high number of false positives. Moreover, we demonstrate that correctly inferring areas of the unobserved network substantially mitigates the drawbacks associated with using VT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resilient Leadership Delegation in Tactical Systems A New Approach for WLAN Channel Selection Based on Outage Capacity Trust-Based Service Composition and Binding for Tactical Networks with Multiple Objectives JIM-Beam: Jamming-Resilient Wireless Flooding Based on Spatial Randomness Performance Analysis of Asymmetric RF/FSO Dual-Hop Relaying Systems for UAV Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1