法定准备金的利益是指“准备金”还是“法定准备金”?

Timothy Brennan
{"title":"法定准备金的利益是指“准备金”还是“法定准备金”?","authors":"Timothy Brennan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1154101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliability in electricity markets is, in many respects, a public good, in that one supplier's failure to meet its customers' demands can cause failure throughout the grid. This creates a blackout externality. One of the remedies for a blackout externality are reserve requirements, where load serving entities have capacity on hand to meet demand in case of unexpected surges in demand or unit failures. We model the magnitude of the externality as a positive function of use and negative function of capacity. Doing so reveals that a benefit of capacity requirements is that covering their costs imposes a tax on usage. After illustrating this possibility, a model looking at the sector as a whole, where spot markets can resolve individual but not overall shortfalls, illustrates that capacity requirements should be increased or decreased to exploit this usage tax effect.","PeriodicalId":343564,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Networks","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Benefit of Reserve Requirements in the 'Reserve' or the 'Requirement'?\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1154101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reliability in electricity markets is, in many respects, a public good, in that one supplier's failure to meet its customers' demands can cause failure throughout the grid. This creates a blackout externality. One of the remedies for a blackout externality are reserve requirements, where load serving entities have capacity on hand to meet demand in case of unexpected surges in demand or unit failures. We model the magnitude of the externality as a positive function of use and negative function of capacity. Doing so reveals that a benefit of capacity requirements is that covering their costs imposes a tax on usage. After illustrating this possibility, a model looking at the sector as a whole, where spot markets can resolve individual but not overall shortfalls, illustrates that capacity requirements should be increased or decreased to exploit this usage tax effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Networks\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在许多方面,电力市场的可靠性是一种公共利益,因为一个供应商不能满足其客户的需求可能会导致整个电网的故障。这就造成了一种不透明的外部性。停电外部性的补救措施之一是储备要求,即负载服务实体手头有能力在需求意外激增或机组故障的情况下满足需求。我们将外部性的大小建模为使用的正函数和容量的负函数。这样做表明,容量需求的一个好处是,支付它们的成本会对使用征税。在说明了这种可能性之后,一个将该行业视为一个整体的模型(现货市场可以解决个别但不能解决整体短缺)表明,应该增加或减少产能要求,以利用这种使用税的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the Benefit of Reserve Requirements in the 'Reserve' or the 'Requirement'?
Reliability in electricity markets is, in many respects, a public good, in that one supplier's failure to meet its customers' demands can cause failure throughout the grid. This creates a blackout externality. One of the remedies for a blackout externality are reserve requirements, where load serving entities have capacity on hand to meet demand in case of unexpected surges in demand or unit failures. We model the magnitude of the externality as a positive function of use and negative function of capacity. Doing so reveals that a benefit of capacity requirements is that covering their costs imposes a tax on usage. After illustrating this possibility, a model looking at the sector as a whole, where spot markets can resolve individual but not overall shortfalls, illustrates that capacity requirements should be increased or decreased to exploit this usage tax effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recommended for You: The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales Concentration Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets Pricing Digital Goods: Discontinuous Costs and Shared Infrastructure Compatibility and Proprietary Standards: The Impact of Conversion Technologies in IT Markets with Network Effects Stuck in the Adoption Funnel: The Effect of Interruptions in the Adoption Process on Usage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1