{"title":"收入再分配和国家财政体系","authors":"Magda Wiśniewska-Kuźma","doi":"10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the global financial crisis and the subsequent recession, income inequality has increased in most countries around the world. According to H. Immervoll and L. Richardson, the recent crisis, in contrast to previous global crises, was characterized by a higher impact on income distribution in OECD countries (Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4). In addition to changes in the labour market caused by recession, current global trends, such as demographic changes and changes in the size and composition of households, also impacted the level of inequality. The problem of income inequalities has not only affected the Anglo-Saxon model countries in their conduct of a liberal economic policy, but also countries classified as egalitarian, such as Germany or Sweden. Governments of many countries have attempted to hinder this process by using fiscal policy tools. Counteracting the increase in income inequality is one of the priorities of the state, according to the concept of maximin wellbeing (the level of overall wellbeing determines the wellbeing of the poorest social groups), or A. Sen’s account of wellbeing (inequalities reduce the level of overall wellbeing). The aim of this article is to classify OECD countries into fiscal models based on the criterion of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and to compare them in terms of the scope of redistribution by means of taxation and social transfers and the level of income inequalities. Based on a comparative analysis of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure in 30 countries classified into six fiscal models and the Redistribution Index, Progression Index and Gini Index before tax and social transfers, the following hypotheses were verified: there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the scope of redistribution; there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the level of income inequalities; and countries with high levels of income inequality are characterized by a higher scope of re-","PeriodicalId":265236,"journal":{"name":"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income redistribution and the state’s fiscal system\",\"authors\":\"Magda Wiśniewska-Kuźma\",\"doi\":\"10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of the global financial crisis and the subsequent recession, income inequality has increased in most countries around the world. According to H. Immervoll and L. Richardson, the recent crisis, in contrast to previous global crises, was characterized by a higher impact on income distribution in OECD countries (Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4). In addition to changes in the labour market caused by recession, current global trends, such as demographic changes and changes in the size and composition of households, also impacted the level of inequality. The problem of income inequalities has not only affected the Anglo-Saxon model countries in their conduct of a liberal economic policy, but also countries classified as egalitarian, such as Germany or Sweden. Governments of many countries have attempted to hinder this process by using fiscal policy tools. Counteracting the increase in income inequality is one of the priorities of the state, according to the concept of maximin wellbeing (the level of overall wellbeing determines the wellbeing of the poorest social groups), or A. Sen’s account of wellbeing (inequalities reduce the level of overall wellbeing). The aim of this article is to classify OECD countries into fiscal models based on the criterion of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and to compare them in terms of the scope of redistribution by means of taxation and social transfers and the level of income inequalities. Based on a comparative analysis of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure in 30 countries classified into six fiscal models and the Redistribution Index, Progression Index and Gini Index before tax and social transfers, the following hypotheses were verified: there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the scope of redistribution; there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the level of income inequalities; and countries with high levels of income inequality are characterized by a higher scope of re-\",\"PeriodicalId\":265236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
由于全球金融危机和随后的经济衰退,收入不平等在世界上大多数国家都有所加剧。根据H. Immervoll和L. Richardson的观点,与之前的全球危机相比,最近的危机的特点是对经合组织国家的收入分配产生了更大的影响(Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4)。除了经济衰退引起的劳动力市场的变化外,当前的全球趋势,如人口变化和家庭规模和组成的变化,也影响了不平等的水平。收入不平等问题不仅影响了实行自由经济政策的盎格鲁-撒克逊模式国家,也影响了德国、瑞典等平等主义国家。许多国家的政府试图通过使用财政政策工具来阻碍这一进程。根据福利最大化的概念(整体福利水平决定了最贫穷社会群体的福利)或A. Sen的福利解释(不平等降低了整体福利水平),抵消收入不平等的增加是国家的优先事项之一。本文的目的是根据税收和公共支出结构的标准将经合组织国家分类为财政模型,并根据通过税收和社会转移的再分配范围以及收入不平等程度对它们进行比较。通过对30个国家的税收收入和公共支出结构的比较分析,将其分为6种财政模式,并采用税收和社会转移支付前的再分配指数、进步指数和基尼指数,验证了以下假设:税收收入和公共支出结构与再分配范围之间存在关系;税收和公共支出的结构与收入不平等程度之间存在某种关系;收入不平等程度高的国家的特点是再分配范围更大
Income redistribution and the state’s fiscal system
As a result of the global financial crisis and the subsequent recession, income inequality has increased in most countries around the world. According to H. Immervoll and L. Richardson, the recent crisis, in contrast to previous global crises, was characterized by a higher impact on income distribution in OECD countries (Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4). In addition to changes in the labour market caused by recession, current global trends, such as demographic changes and changes in the size and composition of households, also impacted the level of inequality. The problem of income inequalities has not only affected the Anglo-Saxon model countries in their conduct of a liberal economic policy, but also countries classified as egalitarian, such as Germany or Sweden. Governments of many countries have attempted to hinder this process by using fiscal policy tools. Counteracting the increase in income inequality is one of the priorities of the state, according to the concept of maximin wellbeing (the level of overall wellbeing determines the wellbeing of the poorest social groups), or A. Sen’s account of wellbeing (inequalities reduce the level of overall wellbeing). The aim of this article is to classify OECD countries into fiscal models based on the criterion of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and to compare them in terms of the scope of redistribution by means of taxation and social transfers and the level of income inequalities. Based on a comparative analysis of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure in 30 countries classified into six fiscal models and the Redistribution Index, Progression Index and Gini Index before tax and social transfers, the following hypotheses were verified: there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the scope of redistribution; there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the level of income inequalities; and countries with high levels of income inequality are characterized by a higher scope of re-