收入再分配和国家财政体系

Magda Wiśniewska-Kuźma
{"title":"收入再分配和国家财政体系","authors":"Magda Wiśniewska-Kuźma","doi":"10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the global financial crisis and the subsequent recession, income inequality has increased in most countries around the world. According to H. Immervoll and L. Richardson, the recent crisis, in contrast to previous global crises, was characterized by a higher impact on income distribution in OECD countries (Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4). In addition to changes in the labour market caused by recession, current global trends, such as demographic changes and changes in the size and composition of households, also impacted the level of inequality. The problem of income inequalities has not only affected the Anglo-Saxon model countries in their conduct of a liberal economic policy, but also countries classified as egalitarian, such as Germany or Sweden. Governments of many countries have attempted to hinder this process by using fiscal policy tools. Counteracting the increase in income inequality is one of the priorities of the state, according to the concept of maximin wellbeing (the level of overall wellbeing determines the wellbeing of the poorest social groups), or A. Sen’s account of wellbeing (inequalities reduce the level of overall wellbeing). The aim of this article is to classify OECD countries into fiscal models based on the criterion of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and to compare them in terms of the scope of redistribution by means of taxation and social transfers and the level of income inequalities. Based on a comparative analysis of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure in 30 countries classified into six fiscal models and the Redistribution Index, Progression Index and Gini Index before tax and social transfers, the following hypotheses were verified: there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the scope of redistribution; there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the level of income inequalities; and countries with high levels of income inequality are characterized by a higher scope of re-","PeriodicalId":265236,"journal":{"name":"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income redistribution and the state’s fiscal system\",\"authors\":\"Magda Wiśniewska-Kuźma\",\"doi\":\"10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a result of the global financial crisis and the subsequent recession, income inequality has increased in most countries around the world. According to H. Immervoll and L. Richardson, the recent crisis, in contrast to previous global crises, was characterized by a higher impact on income distribution in OECD countries (Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4). In addition to changes in the labour market caused by recession, current global trends, such as demographic changes and changes in the size and composition of households, also impacted the level of inequality. The problem of income inequalities has not only affected the Anglo-Saxon model countries in their conduct of a liberal economic policy, but also countries classified as egalitarian, such as Germany or Sweden. Governments of many countries have attempted to hinder this process by using fiscal policy tools. Counteracting the increase in income inequality is one of the priorities of the state, according to the concept of maximin wellbeing (the level of overall wellbeing determines the wellbeing of the poorest social groups), or A. Sen’s account of wellbeing (inequalities reduce the level of overall wellbeing). The aim of this article is to classify OECD countries into fiscal models based on the criterion of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and to compare them in terms of the scope of redistribution by means of taxation and social transfers and the level of income inequalities. Based on a comparative analysis of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure in 30 countries classified into six fiscal models and the Redistribution Index, Progression Index and Gini Index before tax and social transfers, the following hypotheses were verified: there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the scope of redistribution; there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the level of income inequalities; and countries with high levels of income inequality are characterized by a higher scope of re-\",\"PeriodicalId\":265236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospodarczy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15584/nsawg.2019.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于全球金融危机和随后的经济衰退,收入不平等在世界上大多数国家都有所加剧。根据H. Immervoll和L. Richardson的观点,与之前的全球危机相比,最近的危机的特点是对经合组织国家的收入分配产生了更大的影响(Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4)。除了经济衰退引起的劳动力市场的变化外,当前的全球趋势,如人口变化和家庭规模和组成的变化,也影响了不平等的水平。收入不平等问题不仅影响了实行自由经济政策的盎格鲁-撒克逊模式国家,也影响了德国、瑞典等平等主义国家。许多国家的政府试图通过使用财政政策工具来阻碍这一进程。根据福利最大化的概念(整体福利水平决定了最贫穷社会群体的福利)或A. Sen的福利解释(不平等降低了整体福利水平),抵消收入不平等的增加是国家的优先事项之一。本文的目的是根据税收和公共支出结构的标准将经合组织国家分类为财政模型,并根据通过税收和社会转移的再分配范围以及收入不平等程度对它们进行比较。通过对30个国家的税收收入和公共支出结构的比较分析,将其分为6种财政模式,并采用税收和社会转移支付前的再分配指数、进步指数和基尼指数,验证了以下假设:税收收入和公共支出结构与再分配范围之间存在关系;税收和公共支出的结构与收入不平等程度之间存在某种关系;收入不平等程度高的国家的特点是再分配范围更大
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Income redistribution and the state’s fiscal system
As a result of the global financial crisis and the subsequent recession, income inequality has increased in most countries around the world. According to H. Immervoll and L. Richardson, the recent crisis, in contrast to previous global crises, was characterized by a higher impact on income distribution in OECD countries (Immervoll, Richardson, 2011, p. 4). In addition to changes in the labour market caused by recession, current global trends, such as demographic changes and changes in the size and composition of households, also impacted the level of inequality. The problem of income inequalities has not only affected the Anglo-Saxon model countries in their conduct of a liberal economic policy, but also countries classified as egalitarian, such as Germany or Sweden. Governments of many countries have attempted to hinder this process by using fiscal policy tools. Counteracting the increase in income inequality is one of the priorities of the state, according to the concept of maximin wellbeing (the level of overall wellbeing determines the wellbeing of the poorest social groups), or A. Sen’s account of wellbeing (inequalities reduce the level of overall wellbeing). The aim of this article is to classify OECD countries into fiscal models based on the criterion of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and to compare them in terms of the scope of redistribution by means of taxation and social transfers and the level of income inequalities. Based on a comparative analysis of the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure in 30 countries classified into six fiscal models and the Redistribution Index, Progression Index and Gini Index before tax and social transfers, the following hypotheses were verified: there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the scope of redistribution; there is a relationship between the structure of tax revenues and public expenditure and the level of income inequalities; and countries with high levels of income inequality are characterized by a higher scope of re-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bezpieczeństwo ekologiczne w poszerzonej domenie bezpieczeństwa Dynamiczna analiza porównawcza rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego i jakości życia w Polsce na tle krajów UE Sukces wyborczy i polityka rządu Prawa i Sprawiedliwości w opiniach wybranych kategorii mieszkańców Podkarpacia Koncepcja spójności a efektywność organizacyjna Nierówności dochodowe i przeciwdziałanie im w poglądach Sismondiego
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1