Marek Smoliński
{"title":"Kilka uwag w sprawie roli politycznej hrabiny szweryńskiej Audacji‑Małogorzaty","authors":"Marek Smoliński","doi":"10.26881/sds.2022.25.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appearing in historical sources under two names, Audacja and Małgorzata, the wife of the Count of Schwerin Henryk I (died 1228) has long aroused the interest of historians. Researchers have investigated her Pomeranian origins. They have attempted to give the history of her family: husbands, sons, and several daughters. They have frequently discussed the matter of her rights to Sławno lands, which her daughter Ermengarde brought to her husband Świętopełk, Duke of Gdańsk. In the scholarly literature from the nineteenth century, there are reflections on the large role that the countess played in the history of Połabia at the end of the 1220s and the start of the 1230s, a history determined by Schwerin‑Danish relations. The very marriage of Audacja‑Małgorzata with Henryk is also a subject of interest here. Although the political circumstances of the countess’s marriage with Henryk I occasion doubts in the literature, there is no doubt her public actions were dominated by the conflict with Denmark. The Countess took an active part in this, not just as the wife of Henryk I, who was himself instrumental in shaking the position of Denmark in the area round the Baltic. Thanks to her, the peace treaties also discussed conditions for the return of territory (or payment of appropriate compensation) taken from her mother by Waldemar II. This point emerged during the discussions with the emissaries of the Empire with Count Henryk I and his allies concerning the liberation of Waldemar II and his son Waldemar III in 1223 and 1224. In the agreement between Denmark and Schwerin in 1225, the Countess, together with her husband and children, was mentioned as a party. She was also mentioned in the fief agreement concluded in 1227 between the Duke of Saxony Albrecht I and Count Henryk I. \nAfter 1228, Audacja‑Małgorzata played a special role on her husband’s death. Then the Countess had to conclude an agreement both with Denmark and the Duke of Brunswick, who was supporting her. Her position at that time is clearly reflected in a letter by Pope Gregory IX, calling on the Countess to free prisoners (the sons of Waldemar II and the Duke of Brunswick‑Lüneburg Otto the Child). Audacja‑Małgorzata’s guiding purpose was probably to make it possible for Gunzelin III, her still (in 1228) underage son, to take power in Schwerin. The basic aim of the conflict with Denmark was achieved, that is to remove Mikołaj, Waldemar II’s grandson, from the line of succession in Schwerin. By agreeing to end the conflict, the Schwerin side gave up the entirety of the ransom that Waldemar II was initially meant to pay and settled for half of it. The betrothal and subsequent marriage of Gunzelin III with Małgorzata of Mecklenburg can be seen as an attempt to build local alliances and as showing a willingness to live at peace with her neighbours. \nThus, it appears that the Countess was reasonably successful in securing her son’s future and once he took power in guaranteeing him peace with all his neighbours. From that moment, the Countess gradually began to withdraw from public life and concentrated on devotional activities. This was what she was known for in the period before her death, which probably took place in 1270.","PeriodicalId":120293,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Dziejów Średniowiecza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/sds.2022.25.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在历史资料中以Audacja和Małgorzata两个名字出现的施未林·亨利克一世(死于1228年)的妻子一直引起历史学家的兴趣。研究人员调查了她的博美犬血统。他们试图讲述她的家族史:丈夫、儿子和几个女儿。他们经常讨论她对Sławno土地的权利问题,她的女儿埃芒加德把这些土地交给了她的丈夫Świętopełk Gdańsk公爵。在19世纪的学术文献中,有关于伯爵夫人在1220年代末和1230年代初Połabia历史上扮演的重要角色的反思,这段历史是由施未林与丹麦的关系决定的。Audacja - Małgorzata与Henryk的婚姻本身也是这里感兴趣的主题。虽然伯爵夫人与亨利克一世结婚的政治环境在文学中引起了怀疑,但毫无疑问,她的公共行为受到与丹麦的冲突的支配。伯爵夫人积极参与其中,不仅仅是作为亨利克一世的妻子,亨利克本人在动摇丹麦在波罗的海地区的地位方面发挥了重要作用。多亏了她,和平条约还讨论了归还瓦尔德玛二世从她母亲那里夺走的领土(或支付适当的赔偿)的条件。在1223年和1224年,帝国的使者与亨利克一世伯爵和他的盟友讨论解放瓦尔德马尔二世和他的儿子瓦尔德马尔三世时,这一点出现了。在1225年丹麦和施未林之间的协议中,伯爵夫人,连同她的丈夫和孩子,被提到为一方。1227年萨克森公爵阿尔布雷希特一世和亨利克一世伯爵签订的封地协议中也提到了她。1228年之后,Audacja - Małgorzata在她丈夫的死中扮演了特殊的角色。然后,伯爵夫人不得不与丹麦和支持她的不伦瑞克公爵达成协议。她当时的立场在教皇格列高利九世的一封信中清楚地反映出来,信中呼吁伯爵夫人释放囚犯(瓦尔德马尔二世和不伦瑞克公爵内堡·奥托的儿子)。Audacja - Małgorzata的指导目的可能是让她(1228年)还未成年的儿子贡泽林三世(Gunzelin III)在施未林掌权。与丹麦冲突的基本目的达到了,那就是将瓦尔德马尔二世的孙子Mikołaj从施未林的继承顺序中移除。通过同意结束冲突,施韦林一方放弃了瓦尔德马尔二世最初打算支付的全部赎金,只支付了其中的一半。贡泽林三世与梅克伦堡Małgorzata的订婚和随后的婚姻可以被视为建立当地联盟的尝试,并表明她愿意与邻国和平相处。因此,伯爵夫人似乎相当成功地确保了她儿子的未来,一旦他掌权,就保证了他与所有邻国的和平。从那时起,伯爵夫人开始逐渐退出公众生活,专注于宗教活动。这是她死前的一段时间,她死于1270年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kilka uwag w sprawie roli politycznej hrabiny szweryńskiej Audacji‑Małogorzaty
Appearing in historical sources under two names, Audacja and Małgorzata, the wife of the Count of Schwerin Henryk I (died 1228) has long aroused the interest of historians. Researchers have investigated her Pomeranian origins. They have attempted to give the history of her family: husbands, sons, and several daughters. They have frequently discussed the matter of her rights to Sławno lands, which her daughter Ermengarde brought to her husband Świętopełk, Duke of Gdańsk. In the scholarly literature from the nineteenth century, there are reflections on the large role that the countess played in the history of Połabia at the end of the 1220s and the start of the 1230s, a history determined by Schwerin‑Danish relations. The very marriage of Audacja‑Małgorzata with Henryk is also a subject of interest here. Although the political circumstances of the countess’s marriage with Henryk I occasion doubts in the literature, there is no doubt her public actions were dominated by the conflict with Denmark. The Countess took an active part in this, not just as the wife of Henryk I, who was himself instrumental in shaking the position of Denmark in the area round the Baltic. Thanks to her, the peace treaties also discussed conditions for the return of territory (or payment of appropriate compensation) taken from her mother by Waldemar II. This point emerged during the discussions with the emissaries of the Empire with Count Henryk I and his allies concerning the liberation of Waldemar II and his son Waldemar III in 1223 and 1224. In the agreement between Denmark and Schwerin in 1225, the Countess, together with her husband and children, was mentioned as a party. She was also mentioned in the fief agreement concluded in 1227 between the Duke of Saxony Albrecht I and Count Henryk I. After 1228, Audacja‑Małgorzata played a special role on her husband’s death. Then the Countess had to conclude an agreement both with Denmark and the Duke of Brunswick, who was supporting her. Her position at that time is clearly reflected in a letter by Pope Gregory IX, calling on the Countess to free prisoners (the sons of Waldemar II and the Duke of Brunswick‑Lüneburg Otto the Child). Audacja‑Małgorzata’s guiding purpose was probably to make it possible for Gunzelin III, her still (in 1228) underage son, to take power in Schwerin. The basic aim of the conflict with Denmark was achieved, that is to remove Mikołaj, Waldemar II’s grandson, from the line of succession in Schwerin. By agreeing to end the conflict, the Schwerin side gave up the entirety of the ransom that Waldemar II was initially meant to pay and settled for half of it. The betrothal and subsequent marriage of Gunzelin III with Małgorzata of Mecklenburg can be seen as an attempt to build local alliances and as showing a willingness to live at peace with her neighbours. Thus, it appears that the Countess was reasonably successful in securing her son’s future and once he took power in guaranteeing him peace with all his neighbours. From that moment, the Countess gradually began to withdraw from public life and concentrated on devotional activities. This was what she was known for in the period before her death, which probably took place in 1270.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Przyczynek do biografii Wawrzyńca Kaszuby Krokowskiego (zm. 1497) Документ і влада на Галицькій Русі пізнього середньовіччя (У зв’язку з монографією Sven Jaros, Integrationen im Grenzraum. Akteure und Felder multikonfessioneller Herrschaftsaushandlung in Kronruthenien (1340–1434), Berlin–Boston 2021 Rejestr listów wypowiednich rycerzy księcia opolskiego Bernarda do wielkiego mistrza zakonu krzyżackiego Michała Küchmeistera z 1414 r. Mistrz Jan – architekt Pałacu Wielkich Mistrzów na zamku malborskim. "Oeuvre" i oryginalny styl wybitnego mistrza budowlanego działającego między 1375 a 1406 r. Kultura materialna w XIV­‑wiecznych testamentach kobiet z hrabstwa Yorkshire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1