保和大学教职员工的幸福感和绩效

Jerome M. Magallen
{"title":"保和大学教职员工的幸福感和绩效","authors":"Jerome M. Magallen","doi":"10.15631/ubmrj.v3i1.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Well-being in this study comprises the elements such as feeling good, experiencing positive relationships, well-functioning in day-to-day undertakings and being at par with the different dimensions of well-being. The researcher saw the need to assess the well-being of teaching employees in relation to their work performance. The study made use of the descriptive type of survey using the questionnaire as the primary instrument for gathering data from the targeted respondents. The researcher also made use of the evaluation of teaching performance from the deans and the office heads, and the respondents of the study were the 160 teaching employees of the University of Bohol from the eleven colleges. The findings revealed that out of the eight dimensions of well-being, six were descriptively rated Always and only two were rated Often. The findings in this study showed that out of eight dimensions of well-being, six were descriptively rated Always which means Excellent well-being, namely, Spiritual, 4.55,  Intellectual/Mental, Occupational, 4.41, Emotional 4.38, Social and Financial; and only two were descriptively rated Often which means Very Good well-being namely: Environmental, 4.15 and Physical, 3.86. This yielded the fact that their perceived well-being has a positive result. The highest-rated composite mean among the respondents is Spiritual Dimension while the lowest-rated composite mean is Physical Dimension. As to the performance of the teaching, employees are also noted to have been highly positive as the result showed a majority of teaching employees has an Excellent performance.","PeriodicalId":399018,"journal":{"name":"University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well-Being and Performance of the Teaching Employees of the University of Bohol\",\"authors\":\"Jerome M. Magallen\",\"doi\":\"10.15631/ubmrj.v3i1.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Well-being in this study comprises the elements such as feeling good, experiencing positive relationships, well-functioning in day-to-day undertakings and being at par with the different dimensions of well-being. The researcher saw the need to assess the well-being of teaching employees in relation to their work performance. The study made use of the descriptive type of survey using the questionnaire as the primary instrument for gathering data from the targeted respondents. The researcher also made use of the evaluation of teaching performance from the deans and the office heads, and the respondents of the study were the 160 teaching employees of the University of Bohol from the eleven colleges. The findings revealed that out of the eight dimensions of well-being, six were descriptively rated Always and only two were rated Often. The findings in this study showed that out of eight dimensions of well-being, six were descriptively rated Always which means Excellent well-being, namely, Spiritual, 4.55,  Intellectual/Mental, Occupational, 4.41, Emotional 4.38, Social and Financial; and only two were descriptively rated Often which means Very Good well-being namely: Environmental, 4.15 and Physical, 3.86. This yielded the fact that their perceived well-being has a positive result. The highest-rated composite mean among the respondents is Spiritual Dimension while the lowest-rated composite mean is Physical Dimension. As to the performance of the teaching, employees are also noted to have been highly positive as the result showed a majority of teaching employees has an Excellent performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15631/ubmrj.v3i1.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15631/ubmrj.v3i1.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究中的幸福包括感觉良好、体验积极的人际关系、在日常事务中运作良好以及与幸福的不同维度保持一致等要素。研究人员认为有必要评估教师的幸福感与他们的工作表现之间的关系。该研究采用了描述性的调查类型,使用问卷作为收集目标受访者数据的主要工具。研究人员还利用了院长和办公室负责人的教学绩效评估,研究的受访者是薄荷岛大学11个学院的160名教学员工。研究结果显示,在幸福的8个维度中,有6个被描述性地评为“总是”,只有2个被评为“经常”。本研究结果显示,在幸福的八个维度中,有六个维度被描述性地评为“总是”,这意味着非常幸福,即精神,4.55,智力/心理,职业,4.41,情感4.38,社会和财务;只有两个被描述性地评为“通常”,这意味着非常好的幸福,即:环境,4.15和身体,3.86。这产生了一个事实,即他们感知到的幸福有一个积极的结果。受访者中评价最高的综合平均数是精神维度,而评价最低的综合平均数是物质维度。在教学绩效方面,员工也表现出高度的积极态度,结果显示大多数教学员工表现优异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Well-Being and Performance of the Teaching Employees of the University of Bohol
Well-being in this study comprises the elements such as feeling good, experiencing positive relationships, well-functioning in day-to-day undertakings and being at par with the different dimensions of well-being. The researcher saw the need to assess the well-being of teaching employees in relation to their work performance. The study made use of the descriptive type of survey using the questionnaire as the primary instrument for gathering data from the targeted respondents. The researcher also made use of the evaluation of teaching performance from the deans and the office heads, and the respondents of the study were the 160 teaching employees of the University of Bohol from the eleven colleges. The findings revealed that out of the eight dimensions of well-being, six were descriptively rated Always and only two were rated Often. The findings in this study showed that out of eight dimensions of well-being, six were descriptively rated Always which means Excellent well-being, namely, Spiritual, 4.55,  Intellectual/Mental, Occupational, 4.41, Emotional 4.38, Social and Financial; and only two were descriptively rated Often which means Very Good well-being namely: Environmental, 4.15 and Physical, 3.86. This yielded the fact that their perceived well-being has a positive result. The highest-rated composite mean among the respondents is Spiritual Dimension while the lowest-rated composite mean is Physical Dimension. As to the performance of the teaching, employees are also noted to have been highly positive as the result showed a majority of teaching employees has an Excellent performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lifestyle Among Hypertensive Individuals During the Pandemic in Dao District Tagbilaran City, Bohol Employees’ Satisfaction with Motivational Incentives and Employees’ Efficiency Perceived Educational Barriers in the New Normal Among Nursing Students Online Learning Satisfaction and Learning Motivation among Hospitality Management Students Lived Experiences of Interventionists on the Drug Rehabilitation Program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1