垂直轴和水平轴风力发电机的性能比较,以获得最优的功率输出

Jazuli Fadil, Soedibyo, M. Ashari
{"title":"垂直轴和水平轴风力发电机的性能比较,以获得最优的功率输出","authors":"Jazuli Fadil, Soedibyo, M. Ashari","doi":"10.1109/QIR.2017.8168524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the comparison of power captured by vertical and horizontal axis wind turbine (VAWT and HAWT). According to Betz, the limit of maximum coefficient power (CP) is 0.59. In this case CP is important parameter that determines the power extracted by a wind turbine we made. This paper investigates the impact of wind speed variation of wind turbine to extract the power. For VAWT we used H-darrieus type whose swept area is 3.14 m2 and so is HAWT. The wind turbines have 3 blades for each type. The air foil of both wind turbines are NACA 4412. We tested the model of wind turbine with various wind velocity which affects the performance. We have found that CP of HAWT is 0.54 with captured maximum power is 1363.6 Watt while the CP of VAWT is 0.34 with captured maximum power is 505.69 Watt. The power extracted of both wind turbines seems that HAWT power is much better than VAWT power.","PeriodicalId":225743,"journal":{"name":"2017 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR) : International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of vertical axis and horizontal axis wind turbines to get optimum power output\",\"authors\":\"Jazuli Fadil, Soedibyo, M. Ashari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QIR.2017.8168524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the comparison of power captured by vertical and horizontal axis wind turbine (VAWT and HAWT). According to Betz, the limit of maximum coefficient power (CP) is 0.59. In this case CP is important parameter that determines the power extracted by a wind turbine we made. This paper investigates the impact of wind speed variation of wind turbine to extract the power. For VAWT we used H-darrieus type whose swept area is 3.14 m2 and so is HAWT. The wind turbines have 3 blades for each type. The air foil of both wind turbines are NACA 4412. We tested the model of wind turbine with various wind velocity which affects the performance. We have found that CP of HAWT is 0.54 with captured maximum power is 1363.6 Watt while the CP of VAWT is 0.34 with captured maximum power is 505.69 Watt. The power extracted of both wind turbines seems that HAWT power is much better than VAWT power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":225743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR) : International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR) : International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR.2017.8168524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 15th International Conference on Quality in Research (QiR) : International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR.2017.8168524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

本文介绍了垂直轴风力机和水平轴风力机(VAWT和HAWT)捕获功率的比较。根据Betz的说法,最大系数功率(CP)的极限为0.59。在这种情况下,CP是决定我们制造的风力涡轮机提取功率的重要参数。本文研究了风速变化对风力机提取功率的影响。对于VAWT,我们使用H-darrieus型,其扫描面积为3.14 m2, HAWT也是如此。每种类型的风力涡轮机有3个叶片。两个风力涡轮机的空气翼是NACA 4412。对风力机模型进行了风速对性能影响的试验。我们发现,HAWT的CP为0.54,捕获的最大功率为1363.6瓦特;VAWT的CP为0.34,捕获的最大功率为505.69瓦特。从两种风力机的功率提取情况来看,HAWT功率比VAWT功率要好得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance comparison of vertical axis and horizontal axis wind turbines to get optimum power output
This paper presents the comparison of power captured by vertical and horizontal axis wind turbine (VAWT and HAWT). According to Betz, the limit of maximum coefficient power (CP) is 0.59. In this case CP is important parameter that determines the power extracted by a wind turbine we made. This paper investigates the impact of wind speed variation of wind turbine to extract the power. For VAWT we used H-darrieus type whose swept area is 3.14 m2 and so is HAWT. The wind turbines have 3 blades for each type. The air foil of both wind turbines are NACA 4412. We tested the model of wind turbine with various wind velocity which affects the performance. We have found that CP of HAWT is 0.54 with captured maximum power is 1363.6 Watt while the CP of VAWT is 0.34 with captured maximum power is 505.69 Watt. The power extracted of both wind turbines seems that HAWT power is much better than VAWT power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of anode and cathode workfunction on the operating voltage and luminance of a single emissive layer organic light emitting diode Concept development for quantification of integrated energy security Indonesian text feature extraction using gibbs sampling and mean variational inference latent dirichlet allocation Measurement of particles in oil using shear horizontal surface acoustic wave sensor Palm vein recognition by using modified of local binary pattern (LBP) for extraction feature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1