布洛芬与扑热息痛治疗原发性痛经的比较

P. Christopoulos, M. Liakopoulou, V. Perdikari, N. Vrachnis, T. Kalampokas, N. Vlachos
{"title":"布洛芬与扑热息痛治疗原发性痛经的比较","authors":"P. Christopoulos, M. Liakopoulou, V. Perdikari, N. Vrachnis, T. Kalampokas, N. Vlachos","doi":"10.33574/hjog.0305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Primary dysmenorrhea refers to the symptom of painful menstruation in the absence of identifiable pelvic or uterus pathology. Initial presentation usually occurs in adolescence and early adulthood. Medications used to treat primary dysmenorrhea include anti-inflammatory drugs, principally, ibuprofen and paracetamol. So far there has been no comparison of effectiveness and security profile between the two pharmaceutical substances. Objectives: Purpose of this prospective randomized crossover study was to compare the effectiveness and safety profile between those two pharmaceutical substances. Methods: In this clinical trial, 100 young women were included. The inclusion criteria was: a) age between 18–25 years old, b) no present or previous pelvic pathology, based on their medical history and an ultrasound examination which was performed in the 3–6th day of their menstrual circle, a month before the clinical trial. Vaginal discharge examination and also Papanicolaou test were held to exclude relevant pathology of the genital system. Participants were assessed and divided in two groups. The duration of the study was two months. The first group received ibuprofen for the first month and paracetamol for the second month while the second group received them vice versa (cross-over trial). Both groups filled in a questionnaire in regard to how they responded to each therapy. In addition, the security profile of the pharmaceutical drugs was compared as also their effect to the characteristics of menstruation and their probable side-effects. All participants filled in a questionnaire before the assignment into groups. For the comparison of the results, the 10% of the women with not painful menstruation, steadily every month, were removed and paired-samples t-test was used. Results: Ibuprofen has been proven as a safe and more effective therapeutic option than paracetamol in all parameters, when treating women with primary dysmenorrhea. After the administration of analgesics for the two following months, the comparison and statistical analysis of the new questionnaires revealed that, when Ibuprofen was compared to Paracetamol, the analgesic effectiveness was 98,9 and 91,1% respectively. Ibuprofen provided a maximum pain relief in 30 minutes – 53,3% of participants –when Paracetamol demonstrated the maximum pain relief in 60 minutes (64,4%). The pain was decreased “moderate” with the use of Paracetamol (37,8%) and “totally” with Ibuprofen (58,9%). The duration of analgesia with Ibuprofen was 4–8 hours –73,3% of participants– compared to 1–4 hours with Paracetamol (57,4%). Daily activity has been remarkably improved with the use of Ibuprofen (62%) compared to Paracetamol (only 9%). After the administration of Paracetamol 4% of the women appeared side-effects and none of the women appeared with the use of Ibuprofen. All the above results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Ibuprofen provides a significantly improved quality of life when compared to Paracetamol and no side effects have been noticed.","PeriodicalId":194739,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between ibuprofen and paracetamol in primary dysmenorrhea\",\"authors\":\"P. Christopoulos, M. Liakopoulou, V. Perdikari, N. Vrachnis, T. Kalampokas, N. Vlachos\",\"doi\":\"10.33574/hjog.0305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Primary dysmenorrhea refers to the symptom of painful menstruation in the absence of identifiable pelvic or uterus pathology. Initial presentation usually occurs in adolescence and early adulthood. Medications used to treat primary dysmenorrhea include anti-inflammatory drugs, principally, ibuprofen and paracetamol. So far there has been no comparison of effectiveness and security profile between the two pharmaceutical substances. Objectives: Purpose of this prospective randomized crossover study was to compare the effectiveness and safety profile between those two pharmaceutical substances. Methods: In this clinical trial, 100 young women were included. The inclusion criteria was: a) age between 18–25 years old, b) no present or previous pelvic pathology, based on their medical history and an ultrasound examination which was performed in the 3–6th day of their menstrual circle, a month before the clinical trial. Vaginal discharge examination and also Papanicolaou test were held to exclude relevant pathology of the genital system. Participants were assessed and divided in two groups. The duration of the study was two months. The first group received ibuprofen for the first month and paracetamol for the second month while the second group received them vice versa (cross-over trial). Both groups filled in a questionnaire in regard to how they responded to each therapy. In addition, the security profile of the pharmaceutical drugs was compared as also their effect to the characteristics of menstruation and their probable side-effects. All participants filled in a questionnaire before the assignment into groups. For the comparison of the results, the 10% of the women with not painful menstruation, steadily every month, were removed and paired-samples t-test was used. Results: Ibuprofen has been proven as a safe and more effective therapeutic option than paracetamol in all parameters, when treating women with primary dysmenorrhea. After the administration of analgesics for the two following months, the comparison and statistical analysis of the new questionnaires revealed that, when Ibuprofen was compared to Paracetamol, the analgesic effectiveness was 98,9 and 91,1% respectively. Ibuprofen provided a maximum pain relief in 30 minutes – 53,3% of participants –when Paracetamol demonstrated the maximum pain relief in 60 minutes (64,4%). The pain was decreased “moderate” with the use of Paracetamol (37,8%) and “totally” with Ibuprofen (58,9%). The duration of analgesia with Ibuprofen was 4–8 hours –73,3% of participants– compared to 1–4 hours with Paracetamol (57,4%). Daily activity has been remarkably improved with the use of Ibuprofen (62%) compared to Paracetamol (only 9%). After the administration of Paracetamol 4% of the women appeared side-effects and none of the women appeared with the use of Ibuprofen. All the above results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Ibuprofen provides a significantly improved quality of life when compared to Paracetamol and no side effects have been noticed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33574/hjog.0305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33574/hjog.0305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性痛经是指在没有明确的盆腔或子宫病理的情况下,出现月经疼痛的症状。最初的症状通常发生在青春期和成年早期。用于治疗原发性痛经的药物包括消炎药,主要是布洛芬和扑热息痛。到目前为止,还没有对这两种药物的有效性和安全性进行比较。目的:这项前瞻性随机交叉研究的目的是比较这两种药物的有效性和安全性。方法:本临床试验纳入100名年轻女性。纳入标准为:a)年龄在18-25岁之间;b)根据病史和在月经周期的第3 - 6天(临床试验前一个月)进行的超声检查,无现在或以前的盆腔病理。阴道分泌物检查及帕氏试验排除生殖系统相关病理。参与者被评估并分为两组。研究的持续时间为两个月。第一组第一个月服用布洛芬,第二个月服用扑热息痛,而第二组则相反(交叉试验)。两组人都填写了一份关于他们对每种疗法的反应的调查问卷。此外,还比较了药物的安全性、对月经特征的影响以及可能的副作用。所有参与者在分组前都填写了一份调查问卷。为了对结果进行比较,将每月稳定无痛经的10%女性剔除,并使用配对样本t检验。结果:在治疗原发性痛经时,布洛芬已被证明是一种比扑热息痛更安全、更有效的治疗选择。在给药后的两个月,对新问卷进行对比和统计分析发现,布洛芬与扑热息痛的镇痛效果分别为98.9%和91.1%。布洛芬能在30分钟内最大限度地缓解疼痛(53,3%的参与者),而扑热息痛能在60分钟内最大限度地缓解疼痛(64,4%)。使用扑热息痛可以“中度”减轻疼痛(37.8%),使用布洛芬可以“完全”减轻疼痛(58.9%)。布洛芬镇痛持续时间为4-8小时(73.3%),而扑热息痛为1-4小时(57,4%)。与使用扑热息痛(仅9%)相比,使用布洛芬(62%)显著改善了日常活动。服用扑热息痛后4%的女性出现了副作用使用布洛芬后没有出现。以上结果均有统计学意义。结论:与扑热息痛相比,布洛芬显著提高了患者的生活质量,且未发现任何副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between ibuprofen and paracetamol in primary dysmenorrhea
Background: Primary dysmenorrhea refers to the symptom of painful menstruation in the absence of identifiable pelvic or uterus pathology. Initial presentation usually occurs in adolescence and early adulthood. Medications used to treat primary dysmenorrhea include anti-inflammatory drugs, principally, ibuprofen and paracetamol. So far there has been no comparison of effectiveness and security profile between the two pharmaceutical substances. Objectives: Purpose of this prospective randomized crossover study was to compare the effectiveness and safety profile between those two pharmaceutical substances. Methods: In this clinical trial, 100 young women were included. The inclusion criteria was: a) age between 18–25 years old, b) no present or previous pelvic pathology, based on their medical history and an ultrasound examination which was performed in the 3–6th day of their menstrual circle, a month before the clinical trial. Vaginal discharge examination and also Papanicolaou test were held to exclude relevant pathology of the genital system. Participants were assessed and divided in two groups. The duration of the study was two months. The first group received ibuprofen for the first month and paracetamol for the second month while the second group received them vice versa (cross-over trial). Both groups filled in a questionnaire in regard to how they responded to each therapy. In addition, the security profile of the pharmaceutical drugs was compared as also their effect to the characteristics of menstruation and their probable side-effects. All participants filled in a questionnaire before the assignment into groups. For the comparison of the results, the 10% of the women with not painful menstruation, steadily every month, were removed and paired-samples t-test was used. Results: Ibuprofen has been proven as a safe and more effective therapeutic option than paracetamol in all parameters, when treating women with primary dysmenorrhea. After the administration of analgesics for the two following months, the comparison and statistical analysis of the new questionnaires revealed that, when Ibuprofen was compared to Paracetamol, the analgesic effectiveness was 98,9 and 91,1% respectively. Ibuprofen provided a maximum pain relief in 30 minutes – 53,3% of participants –when Paracetamol demonstrated the maximum pain relief in 60 minutes (64,4%). The pain was decreased “moderate” with the use of Paracetamol (37,8%) and “totally” with Ibuprofen (58,9%). The duration of analgesia with Ibuprofen was 4–8 hours –73,3% of participants– compared to 1–4 hours with Paracetamol (57,4%). Daily activity has been remarkably improved with the use of Ibuprofen (62%) compared to Paracetamol (only 9%). After the administration of Paracetamol 4% of the women appeared side-effects and none of the women appeared with the use of Ibuprofen. All the above results were statistically significant. Conclusions: Ibuprofen provides a significantly improved quality of life when compared to Paracetamol and no side effects have been noticed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intraperitoneal analgesia to reduce pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial Impact of Changing Sterile Glove at the Time of Wound Closure to Reduce Surgical Site Infection in Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section; a Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Exploring the association of male-factor related infertility with first-trimester anomalies, aneuploidy, and biochemical markers in infertile patients undergoing ART Post-splenectomy thrombocytosis and survival outcomes of patients submitted to maximal effort cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer Obstetrical attitude towards performing a trial of labor after cesarean section in Greece: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1