{"title":"小组学习方法对学生的学习结果的影响","authors":"Al Afif Hazmar, Marlian Marlian","doi":"10.46963/asatiza.v2i3.360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the difference between the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlah using the Collaborative learning approach and the conventional learning approach at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Pekan Heran, West Rengat District, Riau of Indonesia. Experimental methods were used in this study, while data collection techniques used observation, tests, and documentation. The results showed that the use of the Collaborative learning approach was very good at 88.46%. The experimental class was also categorically very good by 85.48%, while the control class was categorically as good only by 78.39%. There was a significant difference between the learning outcomes using the Collaborative learning approach and the conventional one. This study illustrated that the t value is greater than the t table at a significant level of 5% or 2.5688 > 2,00030.","PeriodicalId":314972,"journal":{"name":"Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengaruh Penggunaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kelompok terhadap Hasil Belajar Akidah Akhlak Siswa\",\"authors\":\"Al Afif Hazmar, Marlian Marlian\",\"doi\":\"10.46963/asatiza.v2i3.360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the difference between the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlah using the Collaborative learning approach and the conventional learning approach at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Pekan Heran, West Rengat District, Riau of Indonesia. Experimental methods were used in this study, while data collection techniques used observation, tests, and documentation. The results showed that the use of the Collaborative learning approach was very good at 88.46%. The experimental class was also categorically very good by 85.48%, while the control class was categorically as good only by 78.39%. There was a significant difference between the learning outcomes using the Collaborative learning approach and the conventional one. This study illustrated that the t value is greater than the t table at a significant level of 5% or 2.5688 > 2,00030.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46963/asatiza.v2i3.360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asatiza: Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46963/asatiza.v2i3.360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在确定印度尼西亚廖内省西伦加特区Tsanawiyah Negeri Pekan Heran Madrasah Akidah Akhlah使用协作学习方法和传统学习方法的学习结果之间的差异。本研究采用实验方法,而数据收集技术采用观察、测试和记录。结果表明,使用协作学习方法的学生占88.46%。实验班的分类很好率为85.48%,而对照组的分类很好率仅为78.39%。使用协作学习方法的学习结果与使用传统学习方法的学习结果有显著差异。本研究表明,t值大于t表,显著性水平为5%或2.5688 bb0 2 00030。
Pengaruh Penggunaan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kelompok terhadap Hasil Belajar Akidah Akhlak Siswa
This study aims to determine the difference between the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlah using the Collaborative learning approach and the conventional learning approach at Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Pekan Heran, West Rengat District, Riau of Indonesia. Experimental methods were used in this study, while data collection techniques used observation, tests, and documentation. The results showed that the use of the Collaborative learning approach was very good at 88.46%. The experimental class was also categorically very good by 85.48%, while the control class was categorically as good only by 78.39%. There was a significant difference between the learning outcomes using the Collaborative learning approach and the conventional one. This study illustrated that the t value is greater than the t table at a significant level of 5% or 2.5688 > 2,00030.