公司移民与欧共体设立自由

F. Mucciarelli
{"title":"公司移民与欧共体设立自由","authors":"F. Mucciarelli","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1078407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the ECJ's decisions in the cases Centros, Uberseering and Inspire Art, a regulatory competition for corporate law can take place within the EU at the early stage of the incorporation of new companies. In the case Daily Mail, the ECJ considered a tax law restriction against the transfer abroad of the administrative seat as compatible with the freedom of establishment. For years, this decision has been considered as applicable to whatever restriction placed by the country of incorporation, even to the forced liquidation. This paper will address the issue at to whether freedom of establishment really allows Member States to place whatever limit to the emigration of nationally registered companies. I will argue that the freedom of establishment covers the transfer abroad of the administrative seat as well as of the registered office and that the country of incorporation can neither liquidate the company, nor consider the seat transfer as ineffective. Nonetheless, a Directive on identity preserving company law changes appears to be necessary, at least to avoid legal uncertainty and to protect interests which may be affected by the moving out of national companies.","PeriodicalId":106641,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Companies' Emigration and EC Freedom of Establishment\",\"authors\":\"F. Mucciarelli\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1078407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the ECJ's decisions in the cases Centros, Uberseering and Inspire Art, a regulatory competition for corporate law can take place within the EU at the early stage of the incorporation of new companies. In the case Daily Mail, the ECJ considered a tax law restriction against the transfer abroad of the administrative seat as compatible with the freedom of establishment. For years, this decision has been considered as applicable to whatever restriction placed by the country of incorporation, even to the forced liquidation. This paper will address the issue at to whether freedom of establishment really allows Member States to place whatever limit to the emigration of nationally registered companies. I will argue that the freedom of establishment covers the transfer abroad of the administrative seat as well as of the registered office and that the country of incorporation can neither liquidate the company, nor consider the seat transfer as ineffective. Nonetheless, a Directive on identity preserving company law changes appears to be necessary, at least to avoid legal uncertainty and to protect interests which may be affected by the moving out of national companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1078407\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1078407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲法院对Centros、Uberseering和Inspire Art等案件做出裁决后,在新公司成立的早期阶段,欧盟内部可能会出现公司法监管方面的竞争。在《每日邮报》一案中,欧洲法院认为,税法对将行政所在地迁往国外的限制与设立自由是相容的。多年来,人们认为这项决定适用于公司成立国所施加的任何限制,甚至适用于强制清算。本文将讨论设立自由是否真的允许会员国对国家注册公司的移出施加任何限制的问题。我认为,设立自由包括将行政所在地和注册办事处迁往国外,而且成立国既不能清算公司,也不能认为所在地转移无效。尽管如此,一项关于保留公司法变更的指令似乎是必要的,至少是为了避免法律上的不确定性,并保护可能因迁出本国公司而受到影响的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Companies' Emigration and EC Freedom of Establishment
After the ECJ's decisions in the cases Centros, Uberseering and Inspire Art, a regulatory competition for corporate law can take place within the EU at the early stage of the incorporation of new companies. In the case Daily Mail, the ECJ considered a tax law restriction against the transfer abroad of the administrative seat as compatible with the freedom of establishment. For years, this decision has been considered as applicable to whatever restriction placed by the country of incorporation, even to the forced liquidation. This paper will address the issue at to whether freedom of establishment really allows Member States to place whatever limit to the emigration of nationally registered companies. I will argue that the freedom of establishment covers the transfer abroad of the administrative seat as well as of the registered office and that the country of incorporation can neither liquidate the company, nor consider the seat transfer as ineffective. Nonetheless, a Directive on identity preserving company law changes appears to be necessary, at least to avoid legal uncertainty and to protect interests which may be affected by the moving out of national companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Delisting Decision: The Case of Buyout Offers with Squeeze-Out (BOSO) Shareholder Oppression and Reasonable Expectations: Of Change, Gifts, and Inheritances in Close Corporation Disputes Valuation of Shares in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises - A Legal Perspective on Valuation with a Special Emphasis on Shareholder Conflicts Informed Trading around Acquisitions: Evidence from Corporate Bonds Primetime for Subprime: Evaluation of the Treasury's Proposal to Prevent Another Credit Crisis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1