用药评价:引入纳布非对哌哌啶医院管理的影响

I. Tsai, Hsin-Yueh Hu, Chen-Chun Kuo, K. Cheng, Ying-Hao Lu
{"title":"用药评价:引入纳布非对哌哌啶医院管理的影响","authors":"I. Tsai, Hsin-Yueh Hu, Chen-Chun Kuo, K. Cheng, Ying-Hao Lu","doi":"10.30918/irjmms.102.22.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meperidine was often used for postoperative pain relief, but it has addictive and neurotoxic side effects. In order to reduce the use of Meperidine and meet the needs of clinical use, the hospital started using Nalbuphine in August 2018, and the effectiveness for about three years was analyzed with the expectations of reducing the risk of Meperidine use and improving the safety of analgesic treatment. The clinical departments in the hospital advocated that Nalbuphine can replace Meperidine, and the notification of short message service for those with large usages was enhanced. Finally, the data on the changes in the usage of Meperidine and Nalbuphine from August 2018 to December 2021 were collected. Overall, the usage of Nalbuphine increased month by month after it was introduced; in contrast, the average monthly usage of Meperidine decreased from 545 in 2018 to 47 in 2021. It was found that a key point of the golden cross appeared for the use of the two drugs one year after Nalbuphine was introduced. In conclusion, Nalbuphine can indeed replace Meperidine to meet the clinical needs for pain relief when it is used in hospitals. In addition, the annual drug purchase cost of Meperidine can be significantly saved to improve the effectiveness of hospital operations, so the non-controlled drug Nalbuphine has the added benefit of drug profit. Finally, it is hoped that other medical institutions can learn and apply these research findings to the management of controlled drugs in the hospital. Keywords: Meperidine, Nalbuphine, patient safety, hospital management.","PeriodicalId":170316,"journal":{"name":"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences","volume":"369 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medication use evaluation: The impact of introducing Nalbuphine on hospital management of Meperidine\",\"authors\":\"I. Tsai, Hsin-Yueh Hu, Chen-Chun Kuo, K. Cheng, Ying-Hao Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.30918/irjmms.102.22.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Meperidine was often used for postoperative pain relief, but it has addictive and neurotoxic side effects. In order to reduce the use of Meperidine and meet the needs of clinical use, the hospital started using Nalbuphine in August 2018, and the effectiveness for about three years was analyzed with the expectations of reducing the risk of Meperidine use and improving the safety of analgesic treatment. The clinical departments in the hospital advocated that Nalbuphine can replace Meperidine, and the notification of short message service for those with large usages was enhanced. Finally, the data on the changes in the usage of Meperidine and Nalbuphine from August 2018 to December 2021 were collected. Overall, the usage of Nalbuphine increased month by month after it was introduced; in contrast, the average monthly usage of Meperidine decreased from 545 in 2018 to 47 in 2021. It was found that a key point of the golden cross appeared for the use of the two drugs one year after Nalbuphine was introduced. In conclusion, Nalbuphine can indeed replace Meperidine to meet the clinical needs for pain relief when it is used in hospitals. In addition, the annual drug purchase cost of Meperidine can be significantly saved to improve the effectiveness of hospital operations, so the non-controlled drug Nalbuphine has the added benefit of drug profit. Finally, it is hoped that other medical institutions can learn and apply these research findings to the management of controlled drugs in the hospital. Keywords: Meperidine, Nalbuphine, patient safety, hospital management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"369 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30918/irjmms.102.22.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Research Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30918/irjmms.102.22.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哌替啶常用于术后镇痛,但具有成瘾性和神经毒性副作用。为减少美培立的使用,满足临床使用需要,该院于2018年8月开始使用纳布啡,并对其3年左右的疗效进行分析,以期降低美培立的使用风险,提高镇痛治疗的安全性。医院临床科室倡导纳布芬可替代哌哌啶,并加强对使用量大的患者的短信通知服务。最后,收集2018年8月至2021年12月美哌啶和纳布芬的使用变化数据。总的来说,纳布芬的使用在引入后逐月增加;相比之下,哌替啶的月平均使用量从2018年的545次下降到2021年的47次。研究发现,在引入纳布芬一年后,两种药物的使用出现了黄金交叉的关键点。综上所述,纳布啡在医院使用时确实可以替代哌替啶满足临床缓解疼痛的需要。此外,可以显著节省哌啶的年度药品采购成本,提高医院运营的有效性,因此非管制药物纳布啡具有药品利润的附加效益。最后,希望其他医疗机构可以学习并将这些研究成果应用到医院管制药品的管理中。关键词:哌啶,那布非,患者安全,医院管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medication use evaluation: The impact of introducing Nalbuphine on hospital management of Meperidine
Meperidine was often used for postoperative pain relief, but it has addictive and neurotoxic side effects. In order to reduce the use of Meperidine and meet the needs of clinical use, the hospital started using Nalbuphine in August 2018, and the effectiveness for about three years was analyzed with the expectations of reducing the risk of Meperidine use and improving the safety of analgesic treatment. The clinical departments in the hospital advocated that Nalbuphine can replace Meperidine, and the notification of short message service for those with large usages was enhanced. Finally, the data on the changes in the usage of Meperidine and Nalbuphine from August 2018 to December 2021 were collected. Overall, the usage of Nalbuphine increased month by month after it was introduced; in contrast, the average monthly usage of Meperidine decreased from 545 in 2018 to 47 in 2021. It was found that a key point of the golden cross appeared for the use of the two drugs one year after Nalbuphine was introduced. In conclusion, Nalbuphine can indeed replace Meperidine to meet the clinical needs for pain relief when it is used in hospitals. In addition, the annual drug purchase cost of Meperidine can be significantly saved to improve the effectiveness of hospital operations, so the non-controlled drug Nalbuphine has the added benefit of drug profit. Finally, it is hoped that other medical institutions can learn and apply these research findings to the management of controlled drugs in the hospital. Keywords: Meperidine, Nalbuphine, patient safety, hospital management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of C-reactive protein and gamma-glutamyl transferase in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome Level of awareness of primigravida about pregnancy and antenatal care at the time of booking in a South West Nigerian tertiary hospital Incidence of anti-HCV found among clinical trial participants during eligibility screening at NovumPRS from 2005 to 2011 Correlation between increased interleukin-6 with insulin resistance in non-diabetic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients Total elbow arthroplasty in type IIIC elbow fracture: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1