{"title":"家庭资源与青少年教育轨迹选择","authors":"T. Klyachko, D. Loginov, E. Lomteva, L. Bedareva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3793839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As shown by the study conducted in 2020 by the RANEPA Center for Lifelong Learning Economics (CLLE),1 the main reasons behind the respondents’ choice in favor of secondary vocational education (SVE) can be divided into four groups: lack of proper knowledge and/or motivation to learn; shortage of family resources; a strategy of maximizing the advantages in the labor market; a strategy of choosing training in the SVE system as a step towards higher education.","PeriodicalId":149553,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal","volume":"405 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Resources and Youth Educational Trajectory Choices\",\"authors\":\"T. Klyachko, D. Loginov, E. Lomteva, L. Bedareva\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3793839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As shown by the study conducted in 2020 by the RANEPA Center for Lifelong Learning Economics (CLLE),1 the main reasons behind the respondents’ choice in favor of secondary vocational education (SVE) can be divided into four groups: lack of proper knowledge and/or motivation to learn; shortage of family resources; a strategy of maximizing the advantages in the labor market; a strategy of choosing training in the SVE system as a step towards higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal\",\"volume\":\"405 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Public Service Delivery eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Family Resources and Youth Educational Trajectory Choices
As shown by the study conducted in 2020 by the RANEPA Center for Lifelong Learning Economics (CLLE),1 the main reasons behind the respondents’ choice in favor of secondary vocational education (SVE) can be divided into four groups: lack of proper knowledge and/or motivation to learn; shortage of family resources; a strategy of maximizing the advantages in the labor market; a strategy of choosing training in the SVE system as a step towards higher education.