Sharaf al-Quḍāh 所说的 Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth 中 al-Jam' 和 al-Naskh 的顺序:分析

Mohd Solleh Ab Razak, Roshimah Samsudin
{"title":"Sharaf al-Quḍāh 所说的 Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth 中 al-Jam' 和 al-Naskh 的顺序:分析","authors":"Mohd Solleh Ab Razak, Roshimah Samsudin","doi":"10.22452/usuluddin.vol49no1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The method used by hadith scholars in the issue of contradiction between hadith which is termed as Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth usually involves three manhaj, namely al-Jam‘, al-Naskh and al-Tarjīḥ. In principle, the scholars of hadith arrange the order by putting al-Jam‘ as the first, then al-Naskh and followed by al-Tarjīḥ. However, a contemporary hadith researcher, Sharaf al-Qudāh, was found to have presented a different order as compared with presented by hadith scholars. Therefore, this article aims to examine the views of Sharaf al-Quḍāh regarding the sequence of manhaj solution of Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth based on the manhaj of hadith scholars. To implement this purpose, the writer is used library research based on qualitative research through contents analysis in order to record and analysis data. The finding of this research shows that the sequence of al-Hadith methodology which is proposed by Sharaf al-Quḍāh is acceptable among muḥaddithīn even though it is not clearly stated in Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīth writings. Accordingly, this writing is the way to enhance the understanding in accordance with the sequence of aplication methodology amongs the muhaddithīn in order to eliminate the contradiction between al hadith.","PeriodicalId":144531,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Usuluddin","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tertib al-Jam‘ dan al-Naskh dalam Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth Menurut Sharaf al-Quḍāh: Satu Analisis\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Solleh Ab Razak, Roshimah Samsudin\",\"doi\":\"10.22452/usuluddin.vol49no1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The method used by hadith scholars in the issue of contradiction between hadith which is termed as Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth usually involves three manhaj, namely al-Jam‘, al-Naskh and al-Tarjīḥ. In principle, the scholars of hadith arrange the order by putting al-Jam‘ as the first, then al-Naskh and followed by al-Tarjīḥ. However, a contemporary hadith researcher, Sharaf al-Qudāh, was found to have presented a different order as compared with presented by hadith scholars. Therefore, this article aims to examine the views of Sharaf al-Quḍāh regarding the sequence of manhaj solution of Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth based on the manhaj of hadith scholars. To implement this purpose, the writer is used library research based on qualitative research through contents analysis in order to record and analysis data. The finding of this research shows that the sequence of al-Hadith methodology which is proposed by Sharaf al-Quḍāh is acceptable among muḥaddithīn even though it is not clearly stated in Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīth writings. Accordingly, this writing is the way to enhance the understanding in accordance with the sequence of aplication methodology amongs the muhaddithīn in order to eliminate the contradiction between al hadith.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Usuluddin\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Usuluddin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol49no1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Usuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol49no1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圣训学者在圣训之间的矛盾问题上所使用的方法被称为Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth,通常涉及三个曼哈伊,即al- jam ', al- naskh和al- tarjj - jah。原则上,圣训学者的顺序是把al-Jam '放在第一位,然后是al-Naskh,然后是al- tarjj - jah。然而,一位同时代的圣训研究者Sharaf al-Qudāh被发现提出了一个与圣训学者提出的不同的顺序。因此,本文旨在以圣训学者的圣训为基础,考察Sharaf al-Quḍāh关于Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth圣训解顺序的观点。为了实现这一目的,笔者采用了定性研究的基础上的图书馆研究,通过内容分析来记录和分析数据。这项研究的发现表明,Sharaf al-Quḍāh提出的圣训方法的顺序在muḥaddithīn中是可以接受的,尽管在Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīth的著作中没有明确说明。因此,本文的写作是在圣训之间按照应用方法论的先后顺序加强认识,以消除圣训之间的矛盾的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tertib al-Jam‘ dan al-Naskh dalam Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth Menurut Sharaf al-Quḍāh: Satu Analisis
The method used by hadith scholars in the issue of contradiction between hadith which is termed as Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth usually involves three manhaj, namely al-Jam‘, al-Naskh and al-Tarjīḥ. In principle, the scholars of hadith arrange the order by putting al-Jam‘ as the first, then al-Naskh and followed by al-Tarjīḥ. However, a contemporary hadith researcher, Sharaf al-Qudāh, was found to have presented a different order as compared with presented by hadith scholars. Therefore, this article aims to examine the views of Sharaf al-Quḍāh regarding the sequence of manhaj solution of Mukhtalif al-Ḥadīth based on the manhaj of hadith scholars. To implement this purpose, the writer is used library research based on qualitative research through contents analysis in order to record and analysis data. The finding of this research shows that the sequence of al-Hadith methodology which is proposed by Sharaf al-Quḍāh is acceptable among muḥaddithīn even though it is not clearly stated in Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīth writings. Accordingly, this writing is the way to enhance the understanding in accordance with the sequence of aplication methodology amongs the muhaddithīn in order to eliminate the contradiction between al hadith.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
قضايا الجندر في المفهوم القرآني والحركة النسوية الأنثوية الراديكالية: دراسة تحليلية نقدية Tafsiran Eksistensialisme Terhadap Makna Kewujudan Manusia: Analisis Kritis Muhammad Sa`id Ramdan Al-Buti Exploring Hans Küng’s Paradigm Theory for Understanding Religion: An Islamic Perspective The Reality and Challenges of Authoritative Regulation on Hadith Publication in Malaysia and Indonesia أثر الأحاديث المردودة المستشهد بها في البرامج الدعوية بقناة "الهجرة": دراسة تحليلة في الفهم والعمل للمشاهدين
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1