{"title":"《恩格斯、曼彻斯特与工人阶级》(纽约,兰登书屋,1974年)","authors":"Myrna Chase","doi":"10.1017/S0097852300015914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and thus de facto to represent the petty bourgeoisie and not the proletariat.\" (249). It is true of course that Marx took a dim view of Schapper's brand of revolutionary violence, but Marx identified Schapper, not himself, with the democrats (whose \"terrorist phrases\" he had referred to in the March Circular), whereas Hunt does the opposite. 14. See Writings of the Young Marx, ed. Easton and Guddat, 368. 15. Minutes of Sept. 15th meeting, Nicolaevsky, 251.","PeriodicalId":363865,"journal":{"name":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steven Marcus, Engels, Manchester and the Working Class (New York, Random House, 1974)\",\"authors\":\"Myrna Chase\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0097852300015914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"and thus de facto to represent the petty bourgeoisie and not the proletariat.\\\" (249). It is true of course that Marx took a dim view of Schapper's brand of revolutionary violence, but Marx identified Schapper, not himself, with the democrats (whose \\\"terrorist phrases\\\" he had referred to in the March Circular), whereas Hunt does the opposite. 14. See Writings of the Young Marx, ed. Easton and Guddat, 368. 15. Minutes of Sept. 15th meeting, Nicolaevsky, 251.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300015914\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Newsletter, European Labor and Working Class History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0097852300015914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Steven Marcus, Engels, Manchester and the Working Class (New York, Random House, 1974)
and thus de facto to represent the petty bourgeoisie and not the proletariat." (249). It is true of course that Marx took a dim view of Schapper's brand of revolutionary violence, but Marx identified Schapper, not himself, with the democrats (whose "terrorist phrases" he had referred to in the March Circular), whereas Hunt does the opposite. 14. See Writings of the Young Marx, ed. Easton and Guddat, 368. 15. Minutes of Sept. 15th meeting, Nicolaevsky, 251.