预测修正与先前股价变化相关性较小的分析师是更好的信息生产者和监督者吗?

C. Hwang, Yuan Li, Y. H. Tong
{"title":"预测修正与先前股价变化相关性较小的分析师是更好的信息生产者和监督者吗?","authors":"C. Hwang, Yuan Li, Y. H. Tong","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1785102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an ex ante measure of analysts’ production of private information (PPI) based on the correlations between analysts’ forecast revisions and prior stock price changes. We validate this measure by examining whether analysts with lower correlations (higher PPI) provide more information value to various stakeholders and monitor managerial behavior more effectively. We find that the stock price impacts of forecast revisions issued by analysts with higher PPI are larger than those issued by analysts with lower PPI. We also find that firms' investment sensitivity to stock prices is higher and that boards of directors rely more on analysts’ forecast errors in their CEO turnover decisions when firms are followed by analysts with higher PPI. In addition, we find that firms followed by analysts with higher PPI exhibit lower accrual discretion and are less likely to restate earnings. Overall, our findings suggest PPI captures analysts’ ability to produce private information and that analysts with higher PPI are better information producers and monitors.","PeriodicalId":146991,"journal":{"name":"AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings (Archive)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Analysts Whose Forecast Revisions Correlate Less with Prior Stock Price Changes Better Information Producers and Monitors?\",\"authors\":\"C. Hwang, Yuan Li, Y. H. Tong\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1785102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose an ex ante measure of analysts’ production of private information (PPI) based on the correlations between analysts’ forecast revisions and prior stock price changes. We validate this measure by examining whether analysts with lower correlations (higher PPI) provide more information value to various stakeholders and monitor managerial behavior more effectively. We find that the stock price impacts of forecast revisions issued by analysts with higher PPI are larger than those issued by analysts with lower PPI. We also find that firms' investment sensitivity to stock prices is higher and that boards of directors rely more on analysts’ forecast errors in their CEO turnover decisions when firms are followed by analysts with higher PPI. In addition, we find that firms followed by analysts with higher PPI exhibit lower accrual discretion and are less likely to restate earnings. Overall, our findings suggest PPI captures analysts’ ability to produce private information and that analysts with higher PPI are better information producers and monitors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings (Archive)\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings (Archive)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1785102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1785102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

我们提出了一种基于分析师预测修正与先前股价变化之间相关性的分析师私人信息生产(PPI)的事前度量。我们通过检验具有较低相关性(较高PPI)的分析师是否为各种利益相关者提供更多的信息价值并更有效地监控管理行为来验证这一措施。我们发现,PPI较高的分析师发布的预测修正对股价的影响大于PPI较低的分析师发布的预测修正。我们还发现,当企业聘用PPI较高的分析师时,企业对股价的投资敏感性更高,董事会在CEO离职决策中更依赖于分析师的预测误差。此外,我们发现PPI较高的分析师所追随的公司表现出较低的应计自由裁量权,并且不太可能重述收益。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,PPI反映了分析师产生私人信息的能力,PPI越高的分析师是更好的信息生产者和监督者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Analysts Whose Forecast Revisions Correlate Less with Prior Stock Price Changes Better Information Producers and Monitors?
We propose an ex ante measure of analysts’ production of private information (PPI) based on the correlations between analysts’ forecast revisions and prior stock price changes. We validate this measure by examining whether analysts with lower correlations (higher PPI) provide more information value to various stakeholders and monitor managerial behavior more effectively. We find that the stock price impacts of forecast revisions issued by analysts with higher PPI are larger than those issued by analysts with lower PPI. We also find that firms' investment sensitivity to stock prices is higher and that boards of directors rely more on analysts’ forecast errors in their CEO turnover decisions when firms are followed by analysts with higher PPI. In addition, we find that firms followed by analysts with higher PPI exhibit lower accrual discretion and are less likely to restate earnings. Overall, our findings suggest PPI captures analysts’ ability to produce private information and that analysts with higher PPI are better information producers and monitors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Caught between Scylla and Charybdis? Regulating Bank Leverage When There is Rent Seeking and Risk Shifting Operating Leverage and Corporate Financial Policies How Safe are Money Market Funds? A Market-Based Study of the Cost of Default Amplification of Uncertainty in Illiquid Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1