你丈夫叫什么名字?:互联网金融认证的社会学维度

Supriya Singh, A. Cabraal, G. Hermansson
{"title":"你丈夫叫什么名字?:互联网金融认证的社会学维度","authors":"Supriya Singh, A. Cabraal, G. Hermansson","doi":"10.1145/1228175.1228217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First order authentication of the privacy and security of Internet banking rests mainly on distinctive user names and passwords. Our qualitative study of banking, security and privacy shows it is common for married and de facto couples in Australia to access each other's individual Internet and phone banking accounts through shared user names and PINs. This sharing happens when the couple has joint accounts, and both persons also have individual accounts, but only one person manages the money. Individual accounts appear to remain important for their symbolic meanings in a marriage, even though online money management may negate access and privacy boundaries between individual and joint accounts. This study thus finds that first order authentication policies go against social practice in some important domestic contexts. Our work points to the importance of sociological empirical user centred security study in order that security design can be built on social practice.","PeriodicalId":164924,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments","volume":"679 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is your husband's name?: sociological dimensions of internet banking authentication\",\"authors\":\"Supriya Singh, A. Cabraal, G. Hermansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1228175.1228217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First order authentication of the privacy and security of Internet banking rests mainly on distinctive user names and passwords. Our qualitative study of banking, security and privacy shows it is common for married and de facto couples in Australia to access each other's individual Internet and phone banking accounts through shared user names and PINs. This sharing happens when the couple has joint accounts, and both persons also have individual accounts, but only one person manages the money. Individual accounts appear to remain important for their symbolic meanings in a marriage, even though online money management may negate access and privacy boundaries between individual and joint accounts. This study thus finds that first order authentication policies go against social practice in some important domestic contexts. Our work points to the importance of sociological empirical user centred security study in order that security design can be built on social practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments\",\"volume\":\"679 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activities, Artefacts and Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1228175.1228217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

网上银行的隐私和安全一级认证主要依赖于用户名和密码的区别性。我们对银行、安全和隐私的定性研究表明,在澳大利亚,已婚夫妇和事实上的夫妇通过共享用户名和密码访问彼此的个人互联网和电话银行账户是很常见的。这种共享发生在夫妻有共同账户时,两人也有个人账户,但只有一个人管理资金。个人账户在婚姻中似乎仍然具有重要的象征意义,尽管在线理财可能会消除个人账户和共同账户之间的访问和隐私界限。因此,本研究发现,在一些重要的国内背景下,一级认证政策与社会实践相违背。我们的工作指出了以用户为中心的社会学经验安全研究的重要性,以便安全设计可以建立在社会实践的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is your husband's name?: sociological dimensions of internet banking authentication
First order authentication of the privacy and security of Internet banking rests mainly on distinctive user names and passwords. Our qualitative study of banking, security and privacy shows it is common for married and de facto couples in Australia to access each other's individual Internet and phone banking accounts through shared user names and PINs. This sharing happens when the couple has joint accounts, and both persons also have individual accounts, but only one person manages the money. Individual accounts appear to remain important for their symbolic meanings in a marriage, even though online money management may negate access and privacy boundaries between individual and joint accounts. This study thus finds that first order authentication policies go against social practice in some important domestic contexts. Our work points to the importance of sociological empirical user centred security study in order that security design can be built on social practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PICTIOL: a case study in participatory design Transient life: collecting and sharing personal information How it feels, not just how it looks: when bodies interact with technology Magistrates and voice recognition: reconceptualising agency "heh - keeps me off the smokes...": probing technology support for personal change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1