瑞士低地和低高山地区融雪径流的模拟

L. Braun
{"title":"瑞士低地和低高山地区融雪径流的模拟","authors":"L. Braun","doi":"10.3929/ETHZ-A-000334295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the influence of snowmelt model structure on the overall performance of runoff modelling in various-sized basins, where the snow cover is typically short-lived and rather thin. The per¬ formance of the following snowmelt models is compared: temperature-index method (Bergstrom, 1976) ; temperature and wind-index method; combination method (Anderson, 1973); extended combination method (using also water vapour pressure as an input variable) energy balance method. The performance is assessed by comparing linear scale plots of measu¬ red and simulated discharge and by applying the numerical efficiency criterion according to Nash and Sutcliffe (1970). For a given catchment, melt rates as calculated by the various snowmelt models are used as input to one and the same runoff model. In the small-scale Rietholzbach basin (3.18 km2), meteorological data as used in this study are measured at a point having a temporal resolu¬ tion of one hour and are considered representative for the whole basin. Over the 300 days of simulation an increase of snowmelt model perfor¬ mance by about 4 % can be demonstrated when moving from the tempera¬ ture-index to any other method. During advection-melt conditions the energy balance method yields the best results, whereas during radiationmelt conditions index methods are sufficient. The combination method seems to be the most suitable approach for operational purposes. In the four Thur basins varying from 79 km2 to 1696 km2, standard climatological data are used (temporal resolution of 12 hours), which are distributed on the basis of an optimal interpolation method into various sub-basins and elevation belts. Discharge is simulated on a daily time","PeriodicalId":367352,"journal":{"name":"IAHS-AISH publication","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"86","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation of snowmelt runoff in lowland and lower Alpine regions of Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"L. Braun\",\"doi\":\"10.3929/ETHZ-A-000334295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the influence of snowmelt model structure on the overall performance of runoff modelling in various-sized basins, where the snow cover is typically short-lived and rather thin. The per¬ formance of the following snowmelt models is compared: temperature-index method (Bergstrom, 1976) ; temperature and wind-index method; combination method (Anderson, 1973); extended combination method (using also water vapour pressure as an input variable) energy balance method. The performance is assessed by comparing linear scale plots of measu¬ red and simulated discharge and by applying the numerical efficiency criterion according to Nash and Sutcliffe (1970). For a given catchment, melt rates as calculated by the various snowmelt models are used as input to one and the same runoff model. In the small-scale Rietholzbach basin (3.18 km2), meteorological data as used in this study are measured at a point having a temporal resolu¬ tion of one hour and are considered representative for the whole basin. Over the 300 days of simulation an increase of snowmelt model perfor¬ mance by about 4 % can be demonstrated when moving from the tempera¬ ture-index to any other method. During advection-melt conditions the energy balance method yields the best results, whereas during radiationmelt conditions index methods are sufficient. The combination method seems to be the most suitable approach for operational purposes. In the four Thur basins varying from 79 km2 to 1696 km2, standard climatological data are used (temporal resolution of 12 hours), which are distributed on the basis of an optimal interpolation method into various sub-basins and elevation belts. Discharge is simulated on a daily time\",\"PeriodicalId\":367352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAHS-AISH publication\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"86\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAHS-AISH publication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-000334295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAHS-AISH publication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-000334295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 86

摘要

本研究探讨了不同规模的流域中融雪模型结构对径流模拟总体性能的影响,这些流域的积雪通常是短暂的,而且相当薄。比较了下列融雪模型的性能:温度指数法(Bergstrom, 1976);温度和风指数法;组合法(Anderson, 1973);扩展组合法(也使用水蒸气压力作为输入变量)能量平衡法。通过比较测量和模拟流量的线性刻度图以及应用Nash和Sutcliffe(1970)的数值效率标准来评估性能。对于给定的集水区,用各种融雪模型计算出的融雪速率作为同一径流模型的输入。在小规模的Rietholzbach盆地(3.18 km2),本研究中使用的气象数据是在一个时间分辨率为1小时的点上测量的,被认为对整个盆地具有代表性。在300天的模拟中,当从温度指数转移到任何其他方法时,可以证明融雪模型的性能增加了约4%。在平流-熔体条件下,能量平衡法得到最好的结果,而在辐射-熔体条件下,指数法是足够的。组合方法似乎是最适合于操作目的的方法。在面积从79 km2到1696 km2的4个盆地中,使用了标准气候数据(时间分辨率为12 h),这些数据基于最优插值方法分布在各个子盆地和高程带中。模拟每天的放电时间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation of snowmelt runoff in lowland and lower Alpine regions of Switzerland
This study investigates the influence of snowmelt model structure on the overall performance of runoff modelling in various-sized basins, where the snow cover is typically short-lived and rather thin. The per¬ formance of the following snowmelt models is compared: temperature-index method (Bergstrom, 1976) ; temperature and wind-index method; combination method (Anderson, 1973); extended combination method (using also water vapour pressure as an input variable) energy balance method. The performance is assessed by comparing linear scale plots of measu¬ red and simulated discharge and by applying the numerical efficiency criterion according to Nash and Sutcliffe (1970). For a given catchment, melt rates as calculated by the various snowmelt models are used as input to one and the same runoff model. In the small-scale Rietholzbach basin (3.18 km2), meteorological data as used in this study are measured at a point having a temporal resolu¬ tion of one hour and are considered representative for the whole basin. Over the 300 days of simulation an increase of snowmelt model perfor¬ mance by about 4 % can be demonstrated when moving from the tempera¬ ture-index to any other method. During advection-melt conditions the energy balance method yields the best results, whereas during radiationmelt conditions index methods are sufficient. The combination method seems to be the most suitable approach for operational purposes. In the four Thur basins varying from 79 km2 to 1696 km2, standard climatological data are used (temporal resolution of 12 hours), which are distributed on the basis of an optimal interpolation method into various sub-basins and elevation belts. Discharge is simulated on a daily time
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling water scarcity across Europe in terms of water quantity and quality Multisensoral remote sensing based modelling of the water balance of endorheic lakes on the Tibetan Plateau Testing trends in annual maximum discharge series in Israel Analytical system assisting underground development with prediction and confinement of changes in the subterranean environment The role of land subsidence and damage to buildings in the selection of suitable sites for groundwater extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1