SVC还是MDC?这就是问题所在

Yi-Hsuan Chiang, Polly Huang, Homer H. Chen
{"title":"SVC还是MDC?这就是问题所在","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Chiang, Polly Huang, Homer H. Chen","doi":"10.1109/ESTIMedia.2011.6088528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-rate video scalable codecs, SVC and MDC, provide as plausible solutions to deal with heterogeneous environment of Internet. They, however, also give rise to a wide debate over which one is more efficient supporting P2P IPTV systems. Our goal in this work is to resolve the debate by providing a quantitative comparison of P2P IPTV systems given different choices of coding schemes and P2P network formations. The answer is rather subtle. MDC-based systems, though outperform SVC-based ones under certain network formation with bottleneck in terms of network throughput, suffer from a lower level of perceptual quality in terms of PSNR due to the coding inefficiency. The results drawn from this paper can be provided not only a lesson to the design of large-scale heterogeneous P2P IPTV systems but also as a strong evidence that a poor choice of codec at the higher level might over shadow the network-level designs and the codec and network formation components ought to be co-designed for optimal user experience.","PeriodicalId":180192,"journal":{"name":"2011 9th IEEE Symposium on Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SVC or MDC? That's the question\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Hsuan Chiang, Polly Huang, Homer H. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESTIMedia.2011.6088528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi-rate video scalable codecs, SVC and MDC, provide as plausible solutions to deal with heterogeneous environment of Internet. They, however, also give rise to a wide debate over which one is more efficient supporting P2P IPTV systems. Our goal in this work is to resolve the debate by providing a quantitative comparison of P2P IPTV systems given different choices of coding schemes and P2P network formations. The answer is rather subtle. MDC-based systems, though outperform SVC-based ones under certain network formation with bottleneck in terms of network throughput, suffer from a lower level of perceptual quality in terms of PSNR due to the coding inefficiency. The results drawn from this paper can be provided not only a lesson to the design of large-scale heterogeneous P2P IPTV systems but also as a strong evidence that a poor choice of codec at the higher level might over shadow the network-level designs and the codec and network formation components ought to be co-designed for optimal user experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 9th IEEE Symposium on Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 9th IEEE Symposium on Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESTIMedia.2011.6088528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 9th IEEE Symposium on Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESTIMedia.2011.6088528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

多速率视频可扩展编解码器SVC和MDC为处理Internet异构环境提供了可行的解决方案。然而,它们也引起了关于哪一个更有效地支持P2P IPTV系统的广泛争论。我们在这项工作中的目标是通过提供给定不同编码方案和P2P网络结构的P2P IPTV系统的定量比较来解决争论。答案相当微妙。在网络吞吐量存在瓶颈的特定网络形态下,基于mdc的系统虽然优于基于svc的系统,但由于编码效率低下,在PSNR方面的感知质量水平较低。本文的研究结果不仅可以为大规模异构P2P IPTV系统的设计提供借鉴,而且还有力地证明了在较高级别选择错误的编解码器可能会影响网络级别的设计,编解码器和网络组成组件应该共同设计以获得最佳用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SVC or MDC? That's the question
Multi-rate video scalable codecs, SVC and MDC, provide as plausible solutions to deal with heterogeneous environment of Internet. They, however, also give rise to a wide debate over which one is more efficient supporting P2P IPTV systems. Our goal in this work is to resolve the debate by providing a quantitative comparison of P2P IPTV systems given different choices of coding schemes and P2P network formations. The answer is rather subtle. MDC-based systems, though outperform SVC-based ones under certain network formation with bottleneck in terms of network throughput, suffer from a lower level of perceptual quality in terms of PSNR due to the coding inefficiency. The results drawn from this paper can be provided not only a lesson to the design of large-scale heterogeneous P2P IPTV systems but also as a strong evidence that a poor choice of codec at the higher level might over shadow the network-level designs and the codec and network formation components ought to be co-designed for optimal user experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of scheduling heuristics for jitter reduction of real-time streaming applications on multi-core general purpose hardware Model checking a SystemC/TLM design of the AMBA AHB protocol Multi-ASIP based parallel and scalable implementation of motion estimation kernel for high definition videos On the management of multichannel architectures of solid-state disks System perspective on embedded multimedia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1