贝叶斯d -优化方法与senest方法估计精度的比较

Liming Li, Jingxin Zhang, Xiaoxia Yuan
{"title":"贝叶斯d -优化方法与senest方法估计精度的比较","authors":"Liming Li, Jingxin Zhang, Xiaoxia Yuan","doi":"10.1109/ICICA56942.2022.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to compare the valuation accuracy of Bayesian D optimization method (DS method) and SenTest method, the DS method sensitivity experimental design study was carried out, and the experimental calculation process was established. The algorithm and valuation accuracy of Bayesian D optimization method and SenTest method are studied by simulation method. The results show that under the small sample size, the DS method can quickly obtain the mixing interval and quickly obtain the mean. At medium sample sizes, the SenTest method is more robust. Therefore, the DS method is more dependent on the prior information, and in the case of unfamiliar product parameters, the DS method is not advantageous to estimate the P response point.","PeriodicalId":340745,"journal":{"name":"2022 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Applications (ICICA)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Estimation Accuracy between Bayesian D-Optimization Method and SenTest Method\",\"authors\":\"Liming Li, Jingxin Zhang, Xiaoxia Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICICA56942.2022.00017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to compare the valuation accuracy of Bayesian D optimization method (DS method) and SenTest method, the DS method sensitivity experimental design study was carried out, and the experimental calculation process was established. The algorithm and valuation accuracy of Bayesian D optimization method and SenTest method are studied by simulation method. The results show that under the small sample size, the DS method can quickly obtain the mixing interval and quickly obtain the mean. At medium sample sizes, the SenTest method is more robust. Therefore, the DS method is more dependent on the prior information, and in the case of unfamiliar product parameters, the DS method is not advantageous to estimate the P response point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Applications (ICICA)\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Applications (ICICA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICA56942.2022.00017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 11th International Conference on Information Communication and Applications (ICICA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICA56942.2022.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了比较贝叶斯D优化方法(DS方法)与SenTest方法的估值精度,开展了DS方法灵敏度实验设计研究,建立了实验计算流程。采用仿真方法研究了贝叶斯D优化方法和SenTest方法的算法和估值精度。结果表明,在小样本量下,DS方法可以快速得到混合区间,快速得到均值。在中等样本量下,SenTest方法更加稳健。因此,DS方法更依赖于先验信息,在产品参数不熟悉的情况下,DS方法不利于估计P响应点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Estimation Accuracy between Bayesian D-Optimization Method and SenTest Method
In order to compare the valuation accuracy of Bayesian D optimization method (DS method) and SenTest method, the DS method sensitivity experimental design study was carried out, and the experimental calculation process was established. The algorithm and valuation accuracy of Bayesian D optimization method and SenTest method are studied by simulation method. The results show that under the small sample size, the DS method can quickly obtain the mixing interval and quickly obtain the mean. At medium sample sizes, the SenTest method is more robust. Therefore, the DS method is more dependent on the prior information, and in the case of unfamiliar product parameters, the DS method is not advantageous to estimate the P response point.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design and Implementation of a Hybrid Recommender System Based on Apache Spark Research and Implementation of Information Management System of University Computer Laboratory Research on the Achievements of Thai Advertising Content Creation and Social Media Channels and Cross-cultural Communication in China Research on Information Security of Pulmonary Nodules Based on DOSA To Do or not to Do Previous Homework in Computer Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1