波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那对一般章程的司法控制发生了什么?

Kemo Sarač
{"title":"波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那对一般章程的司法控制发生了什么?","authors":"Kemo Sarač","doi":"10.53028/1986-6127.2022.13.1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the understanding of the situation in the field of enactment or adoption of general legal - bylaws in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as the issue of (non) control of such acts by the judiciary. Presentation of the situation in this area is presented through a key understanding of the concept of legality, as well as a comparative legal review of control over the work of administrative bodies, viewed from a broader context. The text does not seek to define or define what constitutes general legal acts; it is not defined which acts in Bosnia and Herzegovina have the character of bylaws, having in mind the lack of possibility of judicial control of such acts and thus the frustration that, in the absence of legal definition, these acts are more clearly defined through case law. There is no theoretical consideration of the issue of authority/competence for adoption, as well as the procedure of adoption, and ultimately the content of bylaws. The essence of the whole text is the effort to contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon of the rule of law in terms of the provision of Article I/2. Of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which Bosnia and Herzegovina is a \"democratic state that functions in accordance with the law ...\", and consequently the perception of \"inconsistencies\" in terms of the said provision of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In fact, the article unequivocally points to asymmetric solutions in the constitutional norms and legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina regarding the possibility of initiating and conducting an objective administrative dispute in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it is claimed that such unequal norms do not contribute to the rule of law. Partial application of the provisions of the Constitution is not immanent to a democratic state, and accordingly, it cannot be said that bylaws (which do not pass the control of legality), as a functional segment of the legal order, protect or embody the protection of rights and freedoms of all citizens in Bosnia and Herzegovina.","PeriodicalId":296646,"journal":{"name":"Uprava","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What’s Happening With Judicial Control Over General By-Laws in Bosnia and Herzegovina?\",\"authors\":\"Kemo Sarač\",\"doi\":\"10.53028/1986-6127.2022.13.1.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the understanding of the situation in the field of enactment or adoption of general legal - bylaws in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as the issue of (non) control of such acts by the judiciary. Presentation of the situation in this area is presented through a key understanding of the concept of legality, as well as a comparative legal review of control over the work of administrative bodies, viewed from a broader context. The text does not seek to define or define what constitutes general legal acts; it is not defined which acts in Bosnia and Herzegovina have the character of bylaws, having in mind the lack of possibility of judicial control of such acts and thus the frustration that, in the absence of legal definition, these acts are more clearly defined through case law. There is no theoretical consideration of the issue of authority/competence for adoption, as well as the procedure of adoption, and ultimately the content of bylaws. The essence of the whole text is the effort to contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon of the rule of law in terms of the provision of Article I/2. Of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which Bosnia and Herzegovina is a \\\"democratic state that functions in accordance with the law ...\\\", and consequently the perception of \\\"inconsistencies\\\" in terms of the said provision of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In fact, the article unequivocally points to asymmetric solutions in the constitutional norms and legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina regarding the possibility of initiating and conducting an objective administrative dispute in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it is claimed that such unequal norms do not contribute to the rule of law. Partial application of the provisions of the Constitution is not immanent to a democratic state, and accordingly, it cannot be said that bylaws (which do not pass the control of legality), as a functional segment of the legal order, protect or embody the protection of rights and freedoms of all citizens in Bosnia and Herzegovina.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Uprava\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Uprava\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53028/1986-6127.2022.13.1.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uprava","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53028/1986-6127.2022.13.1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条涉及对波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那颁布或通过一般法律细则领域的情况的了解,以及司法机构(不)控制这种行为的问题。通过对合法性概念的关键理解,以及从更广泛的角度对对行政机构工作的控制进行比较的法律审查,介绍了这一领域的情况。案文并未试图界定或界定什么构成一般法律行为;没有确定波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的哪些行为具有细则的性质,考虑到缺乏对这些行为进行司法控制的可能性,因此令人沮丧的是,在没有法律定义的情况下,这些行为通过判例法得到了更明确的定义。对于收养的权力/权限问题,以及收养的程序问题,以及最终的细则内容问题,尚无理论上的考虑。全文的实质是努力根据第1 /2条的规定促进对法治现象的理解。《波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那宪法》,根据该宪法,波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那是一个“依法行使职能的民主国家……”,因此认为《波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那宪法》的上述规定“不一致”。事实上,该条明确指出波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那的宪法规范和立法对在波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那发起和处理客观行政争端的可能性采取了不对称的解决办法,有人声称这种不平等的规范无助于法治。部分适用《宪法》的规定并不是民主国家所固有的,因此,不能说细则(不受法律控制)作为法律秩序的一个职能部分保护或体现了对波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那所有公民的权利和自由的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What’s Happening With Judicial Control Over General By-Laws in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
The article deals with the understanding of the situation in the field of enactment or adoption of general legal - bylaws in Bosnia and Herzegovina, as well as the issue of (non) control of such acts by the judiciary. Presentation of the situation in this area is presented through a key understanding of the concept of legality, as well as a comparative legal review of control over the work of administrative bodies, viewed from a broader context. The text does not seek to define or define what constitutes general legal acts; it is not defined which acts in Bosnia and Herzegovina have the character of bylaws, having in mind the lack of possibility of judicial control of such acts and thus the frustration that, in the absence of legal definition, these acts are more clearly defined through case law. There is no theoretical consideration of the issue of authority/competence for adoption, as well as the procedure of adoption, and ultimately the content of bylaws. The essence of the whole text is the effort to contribute to the understanding of the phenomenon of the rule of law in terms of the provision of Article I/2. Of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, according to which Bosnia and Herzegovina is a "democratic state that functions in accordance with the law ...", and consequently the perception of "inconsistencies" in terms of the said provision of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. In fact, the article unequivocally points to asymmetric solutions in the constitutional norms and legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina regarding the possibility of initiating and conducting an objective administrative dispute in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and it is claimed that such unequal norms do not contribute to the rule of law. Partial application of the provisions of the Constitution is not immanent to a democratic state, and accordingly, it cannot be said that bylaws (which do not pass the control of legality), as a functional segment of the legal order, protect or embody the protection of rights and freedoms of all citizens in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative Dispute Within the Full Jurisdiction in Bosnia and Herzegovina - The Need and Significance Personal Health Data and the Significance of Its Administrative Protection The Reform Process of Introducing the Licensing of Primary and Secondary School Principals Sarajevo – Potential and Limitations in the Development of the City and Region Specificity of Non-tax Revenues of the State With Reference to Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1