联合部门关于衍生品合同的决定:第870 /2020号判决的关键方面

N. Galasso
{"title":"联合部门关于衍生品合同的决定:第870 /2020号判决的关键方面","authors":"N. Galasso","doi":"10.30687/rg/2281-6100/2022/01/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ruling of the Supreme Court declares a derivative contract null and void due to the lack of informative elements, such as the mark to market, the probabilistic scenarios and the hidden costs. The failure to indicate these elements determines the lack of a clear and defined causal profile of the contract. The Court arrives at this solution, focusing only on the principles of civil law, leaving aside, however, the specific rules contained in the TUF.","PeriodicalId":204526,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche giuridiche","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La decisione delle Sezioni Unite in materia di contratti derivati: profili di criticità della sentenza n. 8770/2020\",\"authors\":\"N. Galasso\",\"doi\":\"10.30687/rg/2281-6100/2022/01/006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ruling of the Supreme Court declares a derivative contract null and void due to the lack of informative elements, such as the mark to market, the probabilistic scenarios and the hidden costs. The failure to indicate these elements determines the lack of a clear and defined causal profile of the contract. The Court arrives at this solution, focusing only on the principles of civil law, leaving aside, however, the specific rules contained in the TUF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ricerche giuridiche\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ricerche giuridiche\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30687/rg/2281-6100/2022/01/006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche giuridiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/rg/2281-6100/2022/01/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最高法院的裁决宣布,由于缺乏信息要素,如按市值计价、概率情景和隐藏成本,衍生品合同无效。未能指明这些要素决定了合同缺乏清晰和明确的因果关系。法院得出了这一解决办法,只注重民法的原则,而不考虑TUF中所载的具体规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La decisione delle Sezioni Unite in materia di contratti derivati: profili di criticità della sentenza n. 8770/2020
The ruling of the Supreme Court declares a derivative contract null and void due to the lack of informative elements, such as the mark to market, the probabilistic scenarios and the hidden costs. The failure to indicate these elements determines the lack of a clear and defined causal profile of the contract. The Court arrives at this solution, focusing only on the principles of civil law, leaving aside, however, the specific rules contained in the TUF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Il work for equity nelle start-up innovative a responsabilità limitata La modificabilità della proposta di aumento del capitale sociale nella s.p.a. Brevi note in tema di marketplace lending alla luce del nuovo regolamento europeo in materia di crowdfunding The Dawn of Crypto Assets: A Comet or a New Universe? Treats and Opportunities of the Upcoming Stars of the Financial Market Money Mules and Tumblers Money Laundering During the Cryptocurrency Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1