移除SDN的障碍:OpenFlow软件交换机在英特尔DPDK上的性能

Gergely Pongrácz, László Molnár, Z. Kis
{"title":"移除SDN的障碍:OpenFlow软件交换机在英特尔DPDK上的性能","authors":"Gergely Pongrácz, László Molnár, Z. Kis","doi":"10.1109/EWSDN.2013.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software-Defined Networking (SDN) promises the vision of more flexible and manageable networks, but requires certain level of programmability in the data plane. Such a flexible, programmable data plane implementation is OpenFlow (OF) which these days is seen as primary model of SDN data plane. In this paper we focus on the limitations of OF in packet switching performance. We share some measurement results we collected using an OF 1.3 prototype based on Intel's Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) and we also describe some optimization ideas. While OF 1.0 can be implemented on high-speed Ethernet switch hardware it has certain disadvantages in the area of flexibility. On the other hand OF 1.3 offers good-enough flexibility, but the poor performance of OF 1.3 implementations seems to represent a roadblock to SDN adoption. In this paper we argue that contrast to the common view, the overhead of flexibility is relatively low. We also argue that the apparent difference between a programmable data plane and a state of the art layered data plane is not primarily due to flexibility itself, but because the lack of optimization in case of flexible implementations.","PeriodicalId":256710,"journal":{"name":"2013 Second European Workshop on Software Defined Networks","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removing Roadblocks from SDN: OpenFlow Software Switch Performance on Intel DPDK\",\"authors\":\"Gergely Pongrácz, László Molnár, Z. Kis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EWSDN.2013.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software-Defined Networking (SDN) promises the vision of more flexible and manageable networks, but requires certain level of programmability in the data plane. Such a flexible, programmable data plane implementation is OpenFlow (OF) which these days is seen as primary model of SDN data plane. In this paper we focus on the limitations of OF in packet switching performance. We share some measurement results we collected using an OF 1.3 prototype based on Intel's Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) and we also describe some optimization ideas. While OF 1.0 can be implemented on high-speed Ethernet switch hardware it has certain disadvantages in the area of flexibility. On the other hand OF 1.3 offers good-enough flexibility, but the poor performance of OF 1.3 implementations seems to represent a roadblock to SDN adoption. In this paper we argue that contrast to the common view, the overhead of flexibility is relatively low. We also argue that the apparent difference between a programmable data plane and a state of the art layered data plane is not primarily due to flexibility itself, but because the lack of optimization in case of flexible implementations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Second European Workshop on Software Defined Networks\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Second European Workshop on Software Defined Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EWSDN.2013.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Second European Workshop on Software Defined Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EWSDN.2013.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59

摘要

软件定义网络(SDN)承诺提供更灵活和可管理的网络,但要求数据平面具有一定程度的可编程性。这种灵活的、可编程的数据平面实现就是OpenFlow (OF),目前它被视为SDN数据平面的主要模型。本文主要研究of在分组交换性能上的局限性。我们分享了使用基于英特尔数据平面开发工具包(DPDK)的OF 1.3原型收集的一些测量结果,并描述了一些优化思想。虽然OF 1.0可以在高速以太网交换机硬件上实现,但它在灵活性方面有一定的缺点。另一方面,OF 1.3提供了足够好的灵活性,但是OF 1.3实现的糟糕性能似乎代表了SDN采用的障碍。在本文中,我们认为与通常的观点相反,灵活性的开销相对较低。我们还认为,可编程数据平面和最先进的分层数据平面之间的明显差异主要不是由于灵活性本身,而是因为在灵活实现的情况下缺乏优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Removing Roadblocks from SDN: OpenFlow Software Switch Performance on Intel DPDK
Software-Defined Networking (SDN) promises the vision of more flexible and manageable networks, but requires certain level of programmability in the data plane. Such a flexible, programmable data plane implementation is OpenFlow (OF) which these days is seen as primary model of SDN data plane. In this paper we focus on the limitations of OF in packet switching performance. We share some measurement results we collected using an OF 1.3 prototype based on Intel's Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) and we also describe some optimization ideas. While OF 1.0 can be implemented on high-speed Ethernet switch hardware it has certain disadvantages in the area of flexibility. On the other hand OF 1.3 offers good-enough flexibility, but the poor performance of OF 1.3 implementations seems to represent a roadblock to SDN adoption. In this paper we argue that contrast to the common view, the overhead of flexibility is relatively low. We also argue that the apparent difference between a programmable data plane and a state of the art layered data plane is not primarily due to flexibility itself, but because the lack of optimization in case of flexible implementations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taming SDN Controllers in Heterogeneous Hardware Environments Control of Multiple Packet Schedulers for Improving QoS on OpenFlow/SDN Networking Virtual Aggregation Using SDN NetIDE: First Steps towards an Integrated Development Environment for Portable Network Apps Virtual Public Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1