心内科实习生入院须知缺陷分析及对策探讨

Shuquan Song, Dehou Yao, Yanna Li, Xueqin Zhou, Siyun Fu
{"title":"心内科实习生入院须知缺陷分析及对策探讨","authors":"Shuquan Song, Dehou Yao, Yanna Li, Xueqin Zhou, Siyun Fu","doi":"10.3109/23256176.2014.912024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractObjective. To analyze the defects of admission notes written by interns of the cardiology department and to discuss strategies of improving their quality. Sixty-nine admission notes of our department from May 2013 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed according to the requirements of the Basic Criterion of Documentation of the Medical Record, which was issued by the Ministry of Health in 2010. Results. The defective medical records accounted for 82.6% (57/69), of which those having inaccurate general item filling accounted for 21.7% (15/69), those having problems in the filling of chief complaint accounted for 26.1% (18/69), those having problems in the filling of the history of present illness accounted for 62.3% (43/69), those having omission or inaccurate description in the fields of past history, personal history, menstrual obstetrical history and family history accounted for 20.3% (14/69), those having problems in the physical examination accounted for 46.4% (32/69), and those having...","PeriodicalId":163748,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defect Analysis and Strategy Discussion of Admission Notes Written by Interns of Cardiology Department\",\"authors\":\"Shuquan Song, Dehou Yao, Yanna Li, Xueqin Zhou, Siyun Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/23256176.2014.912024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractObjective. To analyze the defects of admission notes written by interns of the cardiology department and to discuss strategies of improving their quality. Sixty-nine admission notes of our department from May 2013 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed according to the requirements of the Basic Criterion of Documentation of the Medical Record, which was issued by the Ministry of Health in 2010. Results. The defective medical records accounted for 82.6% (57/69), of which those having inaccurate general item filling accounted for 21.7% (15/69), those having problems in the filling of chief complaint accounted for 26.1% (18/69), those having problems in the filling of the history of present illness accounted for 62.3% (43/69), those having omission or inaccurate description in the fields of past history, personal history, menstrual obstetrical history and family history accounted for 20.3% (14/69), those having problems in the physical examination accounted for 46.4% (32/69), and those having...\",\"PeriodicalId\":163748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Medical Record English Edition\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Medical Record English Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.912024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Medical Record English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/23256176.2014.912024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

AbstractObjective。目的:分析心内科实习生入院记录存在的缺陷,探讨提高入院记录质量的对策。根据卫生部2010年发布的《病案文件基本规范》的要求,回顾性分析2013年5月至2013年12月我科69份住院记录。结果。不良病历占82.6%(57/69),其中一般项目填写不准确的占21.7%(15/69),主诉填写有问题的占26.1%(18/69),现病史填写有问题的占62.3%(43/69),既往史、个人史、医患史等有遗漏或不准确描述的占82.6%(57/69)。月经、产科史及家族史占20.3%(14/69),体检中有问题者占46.4%(32/69),有问题者占46.4%(32/69)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defect Analysis and Strategy Discussion of Admission Notes Written by Interns of Cardiology Department
AbstractObjective. To analyze the defects of admission notes written by interns of the cardiology department and to discuss strategies of improving their quality. Sixty-nine admission notes of our department from May 2013 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed according to the requirements of the Basic Criterion of Documentation of the Medical Record, which was issued by the Ministry of Health in 2010. Results. The defective medical records accounted for 82.6% (57/69), of which those having inaccurate general item filling accounted for 21.7% (15/69), those having problems in the filling of chief complaint accounted for 26.1% (18/69), those having problems in the filling of the history of present illness accounted for 62.3% (43/69), those having omission or inaccurate description in the fields of past history, personal history, menstrual obstetrical history and family history accounted for 20.3% (14/69), those having problems in the physical examination accounted for 46.4% (32/69), and those having...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Discussion on the Method of Classifi cation of Medical Syndromes in the ICD-10 Evaluation of the Effect of Implementation of Clinical Pathway in a 3A Hospital in Shenzhen Error Analysis and Discussion on ICD-9-CM-3 Coding of 216 Percutaneous Coronary Interventions A Discussion on ICD-10 Coding of Infantile Diarrheal Disease Predictive Analysis of Outpatient Volumes of a First-class Grade A General Hospital through ARIMA Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1