葱椒花序、果实和叶片乙醇提取物的抑菌活性

Arogbodo Jo
{"title":"葱椒花序、果实和叶片乙醇提取物的抑菌活性","authors":"Arogbodo Jo","doi":"10.23880/oajmb-16000250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Petiveria alliacea (Linneaus) is a perennial medicinal plant with record of relevance in folkloric and modern medicine. Its root, stem-bark, and the leaves have been focused upon in many researches. However, little has been documented about the antibacterial effect of the inflore-infructescence part of the plant compared to the leaf which is mostly used. An in vitro antibacterial potential of the leaf and the inflore-infructescence was comparatively assessed by the agar-well diffusion method on eight bacterial isolates namely; Escherichia coli (ECO), Bacillus cereus (BAC), klebsiella aerogens (KLE), Proteus vulgaris (PRO), Staphylococcus aureus (STA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSD), Salmonella typhi (TYP), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MOR). The results showed that the pattern of antibacterial activity of the leaf extract was; BAC > TYP > ECO > KLE (26.67±1.15a , 22.67±2.31b , 20.67±1.15c , and 13.33±1.15d ) while PSD, STA, PRO, and MOR were resistant. The inflore-infructescence presented the order; BAC > MOR > ECO > TYP > KLE (31.33 ± 1.15a, 26.67 ± 1.15b, 25.33 ± 0.58b, 23.33 ± 1.15c, and 21.33 ± 1.15d). PSD, STA and PRO were resistant to both extracts. Inhibition zones from the test isolates were significantly higher in the inflore-infructescence assay than the leaf while the Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MICs) were lower in the infloreinfructescence assay (0.049 mg/mL – 1.563 mg/mL) than the leaf (0.049 mg/mL – 6.25 mg/mL). The extracts and some of the commercial antibiotics (septrin and amoxicillin) had no inhibitory effect on PSD. ECO was resistant to all the tested antibiotics but highly sensitive to the test extracts while PRO was highly resistant both to the extracts in this study and all the antibiotics in the control experiment. It was concluded that ethanolic extracts of the inflore-infructescence of P. alliacea in this study demonstrated a significant antibacterial activity higher than the leaf while the duo’s activities compared to that of the control commercial antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":257510,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Extracts of InfloreInfructescence and Leaf of Petiveria alliacea L. (Phytolaccaceae)\",\"authors\":\"Arogbodo Jo\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/oajmb-16000250\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Petiveria alliacea (Linneaus) is a perennial medicinal plant with record of relevance in folkloric and modern medicine. Its root, stem-bark, and the leaves have been focused upon in many researches. However, little has been documented about the antibacterial effect of the inflore-infructescence part of the plant compared to the leaf which is mostly used. An in vitro antibacterial potential of the leaf and the inflore-infructescence was comparatively assessed by the agar-well diffusion method on eight bacterial isolates namely; Escherichia coli (ECO), Bacillus cereus (BAC), klebsiella aerogens (KLE), Proteus vulgaris (PRO), Staphylococcus aureus (STA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSD), Salmonella typhi (TYP), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MOR). The results showed that the pattern of antibacterial activity of the leaf extract was; BAC > TYP > ECO > KLE (26.67±1.15a , 22.67±2.31b , 20.67±1.15c , and 13.33±1.15d ) while PSD, STA, PRO, and MOR were resistant. The inflore-infructescence presented the order; BAC > MOR > ECO > TYP > KLE (31.33 ± 1.15a, 26.67 ± 1.15b, 25.33 ± 0.58b, 23.33 ± 1.15c, and 21.33 ± 1.15d). PSD, STA and PRO were resistant to both extracts. Inhibition zones from the test isolates were significantly higher in the inflore-infructescence assay than the leaf while the Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MICs) were lower in the infloreinfructescence assay (0.049 mg/mL – 1.563 mg/mL) than the leaf (0.049 mg/mL – 6.25 mg/mL). The extracts and some of the commercial antibiotics (septrin and amoxicillin) had no inhibitory effect on PSD. ECO was resistant to all the tested antibiotics but highly sensitive to the test extracts while PRO was highly resistant both to the extracts in this study and all the antibiotics in the control experiment. It was concluded that ethanolic extracts of the inflore-infructescence of P. alliacea in this study demonstrated a significant antibacterial activity higher than the leaf while the duo’s activities compared to that of the control commercial antibiotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajmb-16000250\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/oajmb-16000250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

葱尖草是一种多年生药用植物,在民间和现代医学中都有相关的记录。它的根、茎皮和叶在许多研究中都得到了关注。然而,关于植物的花序-花序部分的抗菌作用的文献很少,而叶片是最常用的。采用琼脂孔扩散法对8株分离菌株进行了体外抑菌潜力比较。大肠杆菌(ECO)、蜡样芽孢杆菌(BAC)、产气克雷伯菌(KLE)、普通变形杆菌(PRO)、金黄色葡萄球菌(STA)、铜绿假单胞菌(PSD)、伤寒沙门氏菌(TYP)和卡他莫拉菌(MOR)。结果表明,叶提取物的抑菌活性规律为:BAC > TYP > ECO > KLE(26.67±1.15a, 22.67±2.31b, 20.67±1.15c, 13.33±1.15d), PSD、STA、PRO和MOR耐药。花序-果序排列有序;BAC > MOR > ECO > TYP > KLE(31.33±1.15a, 26.67±1.15b, 25.33±0.58b, 23.33±1.15c, 21.33±1.15d)。PSD、STA和PRO对两种提取物均有抗性。在花序-果序试验中,分离物的抑制区显著高于叶片,而在花序-果序试验中,最小抑制浓度(mic) (0.049 mg/mL ~ 1.563 mg/mL)显著低于叶片(0.049 mg/mL ~ 6.25 mg/mL)。提取物和部分市售抗生素(septrin和阿莫西林)对PSD无抑制作用。ECO对所有试验抗生素均耐药,但对试验提取物高度敏感,而PRO对本研究提取物和对照试验中所有抗生素均高度耐药。结果表明,本研究中大蒜花序乙醇提取物的抑菌活性明显高于叶片,而两者的抑菌活性均高于对照市售抗生素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibacterial Activity of Ethanolic Extracts of InfloreInfructescence and Leaf of Petiveria alliacea L. (Phytolaccaceae)
Petiveria alliacea (Linneaus) is a perennial medicinal plant with record of relevance in folkloric and modern medicine. Its root, stem-bark, and the leaves have been focused upon in many researches. However, little has been documented about the antibacterial effect of the inflore-infructescence part of the plant compared to the leaf which is mostly used. An in vitro antibacterial potential of the leaf and the inflore-infructescence was comparatively assessed by the agar-well diffusion method on eight bacterial isolates namely; Escherichia coli (ECO), Bacillus cereus (BAC), klebsiella aerogens (KLE), Proteus vulgaris (PRO), Staphylococcus aureus (STA), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSD), Salmonella typhi (TYP), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MOR). The results showed that the pattern of antibacterial activity of the leaf extract was; BAC > TYP > ECO > KLE (26.67±1.15a , 22.67±2.31b , 20.67±1.15c , and 13.33±1.15d ) while PSD, STA, PRO, and MOR were resistant. The inflore-infructescence presented the order; BAC > MOR > ECO > TYP > KLE (31.33 ± 1.15a, 26.67 ± 1.15b, 25.33 ± 0.58b, 23.33 ± 1.15c, and 21.33 ± 1.15d). PSD, STA and PRO were resistant to both extracts. Inhibition zones from the test isolates were significantly higher in the inflore-infructescence assay than the leaf while the Minimum Inhibition Concentrations (MICs) were lower in the infloreinfructescence assay (0.049 mg/mL – 1.563 mg/mL) than the leaf (0.049 mg/mL – 6.25 mg/mL). The extracts and some of the commercial antibiotics (septrin and amoxicillin) had no inhibitory effect on PSD. ECO was resistant to all the tested antibiotics but highly sensitive to the test extracts while PRO was highly resistant both to the extracts in this study and all the antibiotics in the control experiment. It was concluded that ethanolic extracts of the inflore-infructescence of P. alliacea in this study demonstrated a significant antibacterial activity higher than the leaf while the duo’s activities compared to that of the control commercial antibiotics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Versatility and Potential of Microbial Cellulose: Applications, Producers, and Sustainable Production Methods Bioremediation of Some Organic Pollutants in the Aquatic Environment; the Egyptian and the Global Experiences A Review of Nanofiber Coating Technology for Future Food Packaging Anthropogenic Changes in Land Use Impact the Emergence and Transmission of Infectious Diseases Overview of Urinary Tract Infection Caused by Bacteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1