从文本中取火:《血子午线》的叙事与道德

J. Carson
{"title":"从文本中取火:《血子午线》的叙事与道德","authors":"J. Carson","doi":"10.5325/cormmccaj.12.1.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is death if not an agency? And whom does he intend toward? (Blood Meridian 343).W ~%loodMeridian possesses a curious power to enthrall even as it r^Z meticulously carves landscapes of violence the likes of which many readers have never witnessed. Readers have been surprised and disturbed by this, and some have been compelled to investigate the alarming possibility that they had been enamored of a novel that offers neither moral vision nor meaning nor even catharsis. Dana Phillips argues that McCarthy's unanthropocentric language makes no distinction between the equally violent realms of nature and humanity, presenting everything with the same eye of indifference. The book's perspective then is that of natural history-the \"raw orchestration of events\" (447)-which offers no moral insight. Blood Meridian certainly interrogates the radical anthropocentrism that fuels the idea of Manifest Destiny, but this interrogation is only one component of the novel's larger moral thrust. Steven Shaviro manages to find a \"cheerful nihilism\" in his bleak conclusion that the novel's message is that all of us \"end up like the kid, violated and smothered in the shithouse\" but cannot \"dare attach a unique significance even to this\" because we have no individual distinction, being only part of the dance (157). Recent studies have seen more hopeful readings of the kid as the heroic character. But even most critics who read the novel as a prophetic tale or locate some kernel of moral import interpret the death of the kid as a failure or tragedy. Such readings overlook the moral context of the kid's death; neither the fate of the kid nor the ending of the book is so ignominious or arid.Blood Meridian discloses its moral insight through the antagonism of the judge and the kid. The novel questions the limits of language, casting its inquisition fictionally in the rhetoric of the judge and the conflict between Holden and the kid. As I'll argue, Blood Meridian suggests that language-the meaning-for-us of words and the definitions assigned to them-is communally, cooperatively determined, and this collective agreement involves agreement in judgments. Furthermore, the novel posits that every individual possesses a moral autonomy out of which he or she may assess communal meanings and judgments. The judge embodies what Joshua Masters calls a \"textual enterprise\" (25), by which he seeks complete mastery. His antagonist, the kid, represents the moral autonomy through which the judge's enterprise may be weighed, measured, and found wanting. Throughout the story, the kid is associated with fire, which symbolizes moral autonomy and the perpetual creative potential of human beings. As Rothfork, Holloway, and others have indicated, the judge's rhetoric finally holds the key to its own demise: he must have an audience who is convinced for his verdict to abide. The kid is never convinced, and goes to his grave of his own volition, in refusal of the judge's account. The kid's final refusal to dance the judge's dance of death upholds moral autonomy as a foundation for constructing a meaningful personal narrative, one which transcends the limits of language even as it is constrained by them. The fire which the kid symbolizes is passed on to the reader as he champions the possibility of resisting the judge's textual endeavor.The Power of LanguageBlood Meridian problematizes the representational nature of language through the character of the judge. John Rothfork compares McCarthy's ideas to the thought of Richard Rorty and Michel Foucault, demonstrating that, according to McCarthy, we can only know the world in terms of the language we use to describe it, for language is the proprietor of meaning. Judge Flolden seeks to exploit this power of language. Throughout the novel, he sketches flora, fauna, and natural phenomena in his infamous \"book.\" When Toadvine queries the judge about his purpose in recording all these things, Flolden responds, \"Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent\" (207). …","PeriodicalId":126318,"journal":{"name":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drawing Fire from the Text: Narrative and Morality in Blood Meridian\",\"authors\":\"J. Carson\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/cormmccaj.12.1.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is death if not an agency? And whom does he intend toward? (Blood Meridian 343).W ~%loodMeridian possesses a curious power to enthrall even as it r^Z meticulously carves landscapes of violence the likes of which many readers have never witnessed. Readers have been surprised and disturbed by this, and some have been compelled to investigate the alarming possibility that they had been enamored of a novel that offers neither moral vision nor meaning nor even catharsis. Dana Phillips argues that McCarthy's unanthropocentric language makes no distinction between the equally violent realms of nature and humanity, presenting everything with the same eye of indifference. The book's perspective then is that of natural history-the \\\"raw orchestration of events\\\" (447)-which offers no moral insight. Blood Meridian certainly interrogates the radical anthropocentrism that fuels the idea of Manifest Destiny, but this interrogation is only one component of the novel's larger moral thrust. Steven Shaviro manages to find a \\\"cheerful nihilism\\\" in his bleak conclusion that the novel's message is that all of us \\\"end up like the kid, violated and smothered in the shithouse\\\" but cannot \\\"dare attach a unique significance even to this\\\" because we have no individual distinction, being only part of the dance (157). Recent studies have seen more hopeful readings of the kid as the heroic character. But even most critics who read the novel as a prophetic tale or locate some kernel of moral import interpret the death of the kid as a failure or tragedy. Such readings overlook the moral context of the kid's death; neither the fate of the kid nor the ending of the book is so ignominious or arid.Blood Meridian discloses its moral insight through the antagonism of the judge and the kid. The novel questions the limits of language, casting its inquisition fictionally in the rhetoric of the judge and the conflict between Holden and the kid. As I'll argue, Blood Meridian suggests that language-the meaning-for-us of words and the definitions assigned to them-is communally, cooperatively determined, and this collective agreement involves agreement in judgments. Furthermore, the novel posits that every individual possesses a moral autonomy out of which he or she may assess communal meanings and judgments. The judge embodies what Joshua Masters calls a \\\"textual enterprise\\\" (25), by which he seeks complete mastery. His antagonist, the kid, represents the moral autonomy through which the judge's enterprise may be weighed, measured, and found wanting. Throughout the story, the kid is associated with fire, which symbolizes moral autonomy and the perpetual creative potential of human beings. As Rothfork, Holloway, and others have indicated, the judge's rhetoric finally holds the key to its own demise: he must have an audience who is convinced for his verdict to abide. The kid is never convinced, and goes to his grave of his own volition, in refusal of the judge's account. The kid's final refusal to dance the judge's dance of death upholds moral autonomy as a foundation for constructing a meaningful personal narrative, one which transcends the limits of language even as it is constrained by them. The fire which the kid symbolizes is passed on to the reader as he champions the possibility of resisting the judge's textual endeavor.The Power of LanguageBlood Meridian problematizes the representational nature of language through the character of the judge. John Rothfork compares McCarthy's ideas to the thought of Richard Rorty and Michel Foucault, demonstrating that, according to McCarthy, we can only know the world in terms of the language we use to describe it, for language is the proprietor of meaning. Judge Flolden seeks to exploit this power of language. Throughout the novel, he sketches flora, fauna, and natural phenomena in his infamous \\\"book.\\\" When Toadvine queries the judge about his purpose in recording all these things, Flolden responds, \\\"Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent\\\" (207). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":126318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cormac McCarthy Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cormac McCarthy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/cormmccaj.12.1.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/cormmccaj.12.1.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

如果死亡不是一种媒介,那它又是什么?他想对谁下手呢?(《血子午线》343)。《子午线》拥有一种奇特的魅力,即使它精心刻画了许多读者从未见过的暴力景观。读者们对此感到惊讶和不安,有些人被迫调查一种令人担忧的可能性,即他们迷恋的是一部既没有道德愿景,也没有意义,甚至没有精神宣泄的小说。达纳·菲利普斯(Dana Phillips)认为,麦卡锡的非人类中心主义语言对同样暴力的自然和人类领域没有区别,用同样冷漠的眼光来呈现一切。这本书的视角是自然历史——“事件的原始编排”(447)——没有提供道德洞察力。《血色子午线》当然质疑了激进的人类中心主义,这种人类中心主义助长了天定命运的观念,但这种质疑只是小说更大的道德主旨的一个组成部分。史蒂文·沙维罗(Steven Shaviro)设法在他凄凉的结论中找到了一种“欢快的虚无主义”,他认为这部小说要传达的信息是,我们所有人“最终都像那个孩子一样,在厕所里被侵犯和窒息”,但“甚至不敢给这一点赋予独特的意义”,因为我们没有个体的区别,只是舞蹈的一部分(157)。最近的研究发现,将孩子视为英雄角色的解读更具希望。但是,即使大多数评论家把这部小说看作是一个预言故事,或者找到一些道德内涵的核心,他们也把这个孩子的死解释为一个失败或悲剧。这样的解读忽视了孩子之死的道德背景;无论是孩子的命运,还是书的结尾,都不那么可耻或枯燥。《血色子午线》通过法官与孩子的对抗,揭示了其道德洞见。小说对语言的局限性提出了质疑,在法官的修辞和霍尔顿与孩子之间的冲突中虚构地进行了调查。正如我将要论证的那样,《血色子午线》表明,语言——词语对我们的意义和赋予它们的定义——是由集体、合作决定的,这种集体协议包括对判断的一致。此外,小说假定每个人都拥有道德自主权,据此他或她可以评估公共意义和判断。法官体现了约书亚·马斯特斯所说的“文本企业”(25),通过这种企业,他寻求完全的精通。他的对手,孩子,代表了道德上的自主,通过这种自主,法官的事业可以被权衡、衡量和发现不足。在整个故事中,这个孩子与火联系在一起,象征着道德自主和人类永恒的创造潜力。正如罗斯福克、霍洛威和其他人所指出的,法官的言辞最终是其自身灭亡的关键:他必须有一个相信他的判决的听众。那孩子从来没有被说服过,他拒绝了法官的陈述,自愿进了坟墓。孩子最后拒绝跳法官的死亡之舞,这支撑了道德自主,作为构建有意义的个人叙事的基础,这种叙事超越了语言的限制,即使它受到语言的限制。这个孩子所象征的火焰传递给了读者,因为他捍卫了抵制法官文本努力的可能性。《血子午线》通过法官的性格对语言的表征性提出了质疑。约翰·罗斯福克将麦卡锡的思想与理查德·罗蒂和米歇尔·福柯的思想进行了比较,表明在麦卡锡看来,我们只能通过我们用来描述世界的语言来认识世界,因为语言是意义的所有者。福尔登法官试图利用这种语言的力量。在整部小说中,他在他那本臭名昭著的“书”中描绘了动植物和自然现象。当Toadvine询问法官他记录所有这些事情的目的时,folden回答说:“任何在我不知道的情况下存在的东西都是未经我同意的。”…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drawing Fire from the Text: Narrative and Morality in Blood Meridian
What is death if not an agency? And whom does he intend toward? (Blood Meridian 343).W ~%loodMeridian possesses a curious power to enthrall even as it r^Z meticulously carves landscapes of violence the likes of which many readers have never witnessed. Readers have been surprised and disturbed by this, and some have been compelled to investigate the alarming possibility that they had been enamored of a novel that offers neither moral vision nor meaning nor even catharsis. Dana Phillips argues that McCarthy's unanthropocentric language makes no distinction between the equally violent realms of nature and humanity, presenting everything with the same eye of indifference. The book's perspective then is that of natural history-the "raw orchestration of events" (447)-which offers no moral insight. Blood Meridian certainly interrogates the radical anthropocentrism that fuels the idea of Manifest Destiny, but this interrogation is only one component of the novel's larger moral thrust. Steven Shaviro manages to find a "cheerful nihilism" in his bleak conclusion that the novel's message is that all of us "end up like the kid, violated and smothered in the shithouse" but cannot "dare attach a unique significance even to this" because we have no individual distinction, being only part of the dance (157). Recent studies have seen more hopeful readings of the kid as the heroic character. But even most critics who read the novel as a prophetic tale or locate some kernel of moral import interpret the death of the kid as a failure or tragedy. Such readings overlook the moral context of the kid's death; neither the fate of the kid nor the ending of the book is so ignominious or arid.Blood Meridian discloses its moral insight through the antagonism of the judge and the kid. The novel questions the limits of language, casting its inquisition fictionally in the rhetoric of the judge and the conflict between Holden and the kid. As I'll argue, Blood Meridian suggests that language-the meaning-for-us of words and the definitions assigned to them-is communally, cooperatively determined, and this collective agreement involves agreement in judgments. Furthermore, the novel posits that every individual possesses a moral autonomy out of which he or she may assess communal meanings and judgments. The judge embodies what Joshua Masters calls a "textual enterprise" (25), by which he seeks complete mastery. His antagonist, the kid, represents the moral autonomy through which the judge's enterprise may be weighed, measured, and found wanting. Throughout the story, the kid is associated with fire, which symbolizes moral autonomy and the perpetual creative potential of human beings. As Rothfork, Holloway, and others have indicated, the judge's rhetoric finally holds the key to its own demise: he must have an audience who is convinced for his verdict to abide. The kid is never convinced, and goes to his grave of his own volition, in refusal of the judge's account. The kid's final refusal to dance the judge's dance of death upholds moral autonomy as a foundation for constructing a meaningful personal narrative, one which transcends the limits of language even as it is constrained by them. The fire which the kid symbolizes is passed on to the reader as he champions the possibility of resisting the judge's textual endeavor.The Power of LanguageBlood Meridian problematizes the representational nature of language through the character of the judge. John Rothfork compares McCarthy's ideas to the thought of Richard Rorty and Michel Foucault, demonstrating that, according to McCarthy, we can only know the world in terms of the language we use to describe it, for language is the proprietor of meaning. Judge Flolden seeks to exploit this power of language. Throughout the novel, he sketches flora, fauna, and natural phenomena in his infamous "book." When Toadvine queries the judge about his purpose in recording all these things, Flolden responds, "Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent" (207). …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“The coming darkness”: Romantic Tragedy, Shakespeare, and Nahua Myth in Cormac McCarthy’s The Passenger and Stella Maris Religion Between the Parody of Faith and the Epiphany of Grace in Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian “Selecting between the dream and the reality”: The Mexican Revolution in All the Pretty Horses Cormac McCarthy’s Earliest Publication: A Letter on the Beat Generation “Only the dead have seen an end to war”: Misattributing to Plato in Stella Maris?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1