[术前卵巢良恶性肿瘤的多因素分析]。

Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi Pub Date : 1990-11-20
N Kishi
{"title":"[术前卵巢良恶性肿瘤的多因素分析]。","authors":"N Kishi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To obtain a precise preoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors, multivariate analysis was performed using a combination of tumor markers, diagnostic imagings, clinical findings and epidemiological data. Twenty-eight factors were selected for a discriminant analysis, which included 10 factors for tumor markers, 8 for diagnostic imagings, 4 for clinical features and 6 for epidemiological data. On 235 patients (malignant: 100, benign: 135), the usefulness of the discriminant analysis was evaluated retrospectively. As a results, an accuracy of preoperative discrimination was 82% for a discriminant analysis of tumor markers alone, 91% for diagnostic imagings, 84% clinical findings and 65% for epidemiological data. Twenty-one factors were selected by chi-square test or T-test. When 21 factors were used, the sensitivity and the specificity for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor were 98% and 88% respectively. The results indicate that the discriminant analysis is valuable for preoperative discrimination of patient with ovarian tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":76232,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","volume":"25 11","pages":"2702-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumors by multivariate analysis].\",\"authors\":\"N Kishi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To obtain a precise preoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors, multivariate analysis was performed using a combination of tumor markers, diagnostic imagings, clinical findings and epidemiological data. Twenty-eight factors were selected for a discriminant analysis, which included 10 factors for tumor markers, 8 for diagnostic imagings, 4 for clinical features and 6 for epidemiological data. On 235 patients (malignant: 100, benign: 135), the usefulness of the discriminant analysis was evaluated retrospectively. As a results, an accuracy of preoperative discrimination was 82% for a discriminant analysis of tumor markers alone, 91% for diagnostic imagings, 84% clinical findings and 65% for epidemiological data. Twenty-one factors were selected by chi-square test or T-test. When 21 factors were used, the sensitivity and the specificity for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor were 98% and 88% respectively. The results indicate that the discriminant analysis is valuable for preoperative discrimination of patient with ovarian tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi\",\"volume\":\"25 11\",\"pages\":\"2702-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai shi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了准确诊断卵巢良恶性肿瘤,我们结合肿瘤标志物、诊断影像、临床表现和流行病学资料进行多因素分析。选取28个因素进行判别分析,其中肿瘤标志物因素10个,诊断影像因素8个,临床特征因素4个,流行病学资料因素6个。对235例患者(恶性100例,良性135例),回顾性评价了判别分析的有效性。结果,单独对肿瘤标志物进行判别分析,术前鉴别准确率为82%,诊断影像为91%,临床表现为84%,流行病学资料为65%。采用卡方检验或t检验选择21个影响因素。综合21项因素,诊断卵巢恶性肿瘤的敏感性为98%,特异性为88%。结果表明,鉴别分析对卵巢肿瘤患者的术前鉴别有一定的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumors by multivariate analysis].

To obtain a precise preoperative diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors, multivariate analysis was performed using a combination of tumor markers, diagnostic imagings, clinical findings and epidemiological data. Twenty-eight factors were selected for a discriminant analysis, which included 10 factors for tumor markers, 8 for diagnostic imagings, 4 for clinical features and 6 for epidemiological data. On 235 patients (malignant: 100, benign: 135), the usefulness of the discriminant analysis was evaluated retrospectively. As a results, an accuracy of preoperative discrimination was 82% for a discriminant analysis of tumor markers alone, 91% for diagnostic imagings, 84% clinical findings and 65% for epidemiological data. Twenty-one factors were selected by chi-square test or T-test. When 21 factors were used, the sensitivity and the specificity for the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor were 98% and 88% respectively. The results indicate that the discriminant analysis is valuable for preoperative discrimination of patient with ovarian tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Chemoembolization therapy with lipiodol, cisplatin and etoposide for hepatocellular carcinoma]. [Relationship between human papillomavirus and oncogenes (c-myc, N-myc) amplification in human cervical cancers]. [Treatment of liver metastatic ovarian cancer with sequential administration of OK-432 and etoposide]. Flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA content in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. [The effect on prognosis and the adverse drug reaction of intermittent cisplatin therapy in advanced ovarian cancer patients].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1