【胶片x线摄影与干性x线摄影的比较研究】包括标本放射照相]。

M Maeda, K Hayakawa, Y Okuno, T Torizuka, M Mitsumori, T Soga, T Misaki, S Dokou, K Ito
{"title":"【胶片x线摄影与干性x线摄影的比较研究】包括标本放射照相]。","authors":"M Maeda,&nbsp;K Hayakawa,&nbsp;Y Okuno,&nbsp;T Torizuka,&nbsp;M Mitsumori,&nbsp;T Soga,&nbsp;T Misaki,&nbsp;S Dokou,&nbsp;K Ito","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We retrospectively evaluated preoperative film- and xeromammography of 23 cases with breast cancers, and compared with postoperative specimen radiography to assess tumor delineation and microcalcification detectability. In tumor detection and margin delineation, film mammography was superior to xeromammography, and in microcalcification, film mammography was equal to xeromammography. These results had a effect on the diagnosis of breast cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21520,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography","volume":"35 11","pages":"1381-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparative study between film mammography and xeromammography; including specimen radiography].\",\"authors\":\"M Maeda,&nbsp;K Hayakawa,&nbsp;Y Okuno,&nbsp;T Torizuka,&nbsp;M Mitsumori,&nbsp;T Soga,&nbsp;T Misaki,&nbsp;S Dokou,&nbsp;K Ito\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We retrospectively evaluated preoperative film- and xeromammography of 23 cases with breast cancers, and compared with postoperative specimen radiography to assess tumor delineation and microcalcification detectability. In tumor detection and margin delineation, film mammography was superior to xeromammography, and in microcalcification, film mammography was equal to xeromammography. These results had a effect on the diagnosis of breast cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography\",\"volume\":\"35 11\",\"pages\":\"1381-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾性评估了23例乳腺癌患者的术前胶片和干性乳房x线摄影,并与术后标本x线摄影进行比较,以评估肿瘤的描绘和微钙化的可检测性。在肿瘤检测和边界划定方面,乳房x线摄影优于干性乳房x线摄影,在微钙化方面,乳房x线摄影与干性乳房x线摄影相当。这些结果对乳腺癌的诊断有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparative study between film mammography and xeromammography; including specimen radiography].

We retrospectively evaluated preoperative film- and xeromammography of 23 cases with breast cancers, and compared with postoperative specimen radiography to assess tumor delineation and microcalcification detectability. In tumor detection and margin delineation, film mammography was superior to xeromammography, and in microcalcification, film mammography was equal to xeromammography. These results had a effect on the diagnosis of breast cancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Acute esophagitis]. Brain Metastases [Soft tissue sarcoma]. [Dermoid cyst of the skull]. Metastatic Brain Tumours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1