“反对的手套戴上了”:约翰·奥利弗作为新自由主义批判的最后一周

Nickie Michaud Wild
{"title":"“反对的手套戴上了”:约翰·奥利弗作为新自由主义批判的最后一周","authors":"Nickie Michaud Wild","doi":"10.1093/CCC/TCZ021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n HBO’s Last Week Tonight has frequently featured host John Oliver’s critiques of global neoliberalism. His pronouncements are often not just the taking of an ideological position, but a moral one which borders on the theological, conceptualizing the entrenchment of inequality as a normative evil. It is a form of activism where he uses his platform to exhort his audience to fight back against large, impersonal forces that he portrays as taking advantage of them. This article analyzes the program’s mentions of the institutional effects of these policies on individuals and the economy and how mainstream media sources have either amplified or ignored his claims. “Serious” journalism is more likely to cover his stories that have simple, dramatic villains rather than complex causes.","PeriodicalId":300302,"journal":{"name":"Communication, Culture and Critique","volume":"410 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Mittens of Disapproval Are On”: John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight as Neoliberal Critique\",\"authors\":\"Nickie Michaud Wild\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CCC/TCZ021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n HBO’s Last Week Tonight has frequently featured host John Oliver’s critiques of global neoliberalism. His pronouncements are often not just the taking of an ideological position, but a moral one which borders on the theological, conceptualizing the entrenchment of inequality as a normative evil. It is a form of activism where he uses his platform to exhort his audience to fight back against large, impersonal forces that he portrays as taking advantage of them. This article analyzes the program’s mentions of the institutional effects of these policies on individuals and the economy and how mainstream media sources have either amplified or ignored his claims. “Serious” journalism is more likely to cover his stories that have simple, dramatic villains rather than complex causes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication, Culture and Critique\",\"volume\":\"410 26\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication, Culture and Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CCC/TCZ021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication, Culture and Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CCC/TCZ021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

HBO的《上周今夜秀》经常以主持人约翰·奥利弗对全球新自由主义的批评为特色。他的声明通常不只是采取意识形态立场,而是一种接近神学的道德立场,将不平等的根深蒂固概念化为规范的邪恶。这是一种行动主义,他利用自己的平台,告诫听众反击他所描绘的利用他们的庞大的、非个人的力量。本文分析了该节目中提到的这些政策对个人和经济的制度影响,以及主流媒体是如何放大或忽视他的主张的。“严肃”的新闻更有可能报道他的故事,这些故事有简单、戏剧性的反派,而不是复杂的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“The Mittens of Disapproval Are On”: John Oliver’s Last Week Tonight as Neoliberal Critique
HBO’s Last Week Tonight has frequently featured host John Oliver’s critiques of global neoliberalism. His pronouncements are often not just the taking of an ideological position, but a moral one which borders on the theological, conceptualizing the entrenchment of inequality as a normative evil. It is a form of activism where he uses his platform to exhort his audience to fight back against large, impersonal forces that he portrays as taking advantage of them. This article analyzes the program’s mentions of the institutional effects of these policies on individuals and the economy and how mainstream media sources have either amplified or ignored his claims. “Serious” journalism is more likely to cover his stories that have simple, dramatic villains rather than complex causes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Hash)tagging intersection(ality): Black and Palestinian experiences on Twitter The anti-caste alter-network: equality labs and anti-caste activism in the US “Are you me?”: understanding the political potential of feminist identity spaces on Reddit during the COVID-19 pandemic “Fight as a little girl!”: Chilean feminist cyberactivism and its outcome on the agenda The most hated tree in America: negative difference, the White imaginary, and the Bradford pear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1