别管那些闹鬼:这里是非虚构动画的仓库、网站和档案

P. Wells
{"title":"别管那些闹鬼:这里是非虚构动画的仓库、网站和档案","authors":"P. Wells","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694112.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul Wells offers a critical-autobiographical account, augmented by a consistently surprising and thought-provoking range of cross-disciplinary case study examples, of his active and path-breaking engagement in animated documentary theory and production since the early 1990s. Wells engages with the critical literature surrounding the concept and practice of animated documentary but focuses more on the ways in which animation can act as an enabling conduit for a range of visual and/or narrative arts, offering a creative toolbox that supports practitioners engaged in documentary work across a range of disciplines. This chapter advances three central insights: the increasingly multi-disciplinary nature of contemporary visual, literary and popular cultures; the notable aesthetic and ideological potentialities possessed by polyvocal, multi-disciplinary and multi-register creative practices and strategies; and animated documentary’s privileged position at the forefront of present-day re-theorisations of a range of foundational documentary concepts, such as the repository, the record and the archive.","PeriodicalId":272749,"journal":{"name":"Drawn from Life","volume":"176 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Never Mind the Bollackers: Here’s the Repositories, Sites and Archives in Nonfiction Animation\",\"authors\":\"P. Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694112.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Paul Wells offers a critical-autobiographical account, augmented by a consistently surprising and thought-provoking range of cross-disciplinary case study examples, of his active and path-breaking engagement in animated documentary theory and production since the early 1990s. Wells engages with the critical literature surrounding the concept and practice of animated documentary but focuses more on the ways in which animation can act as an enabling conduit for a range of visual and/or narrative arts, offering a creative toolbox that supports practitioners engaged in documentary work across a range of disciplines. This chapter advances three central insights: the increasingly multi-disciplinary nature of contemporary visual, literary and popular cultures; the notable aesthetic and ideological potentialities possessed by polyvocal, multi-disciplinary and multi-register creative practices and strategies; and animated documentary’s privileged position at the forefront of present-day re-theorisations of a range of foundational documentary concepts, such as the repository, the record and the archive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drawn from Life\",\"volume\":\"176 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drawn from Life\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694112.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drawn from Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748694112.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保罗·威尔斯(Paul Wells)自20世纪90年代初以来一直积极从事动画纪录片的理论和制作,他提供了一本批判性的自传体书,并辅以一系列令人惊讶和发人深省的跨学科案例研究。威尔斯与围绕动画纪录片的概念和实践的批评文献进行了接触,但更多地关注动画作为一系列视觉和/或叙事艺术的支持渠道的方式,提供了一个创造性的工具箱,支持从事各种学科的纪录片工作的从业者。本章提出了三个核心观点:当代视觉、文学和流行文化日益多学科的本质;多声音、多学科、多语域的创作实践和策略所具有的显著的审美和思想潜力;动画纪录片在当今一系列基本纪录片概念(如存储库、记录和档案)重新理论化的前沿处于特权地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Never Mind the Bollackers: Here’s the Repositories, Sites and Archives in Nonfiction Animation
Paul Wells offers a critical-autobiographical account, augmented by a consistently surprising and thought-provoking range of cross-disciplinary case study examples, of his active and path-breaking engagement in animated documentary theory and production since the early 1990s. Wells engages with the critical literature surrounding the concept and practice of animated documentary but focuses more on the ways in which animation can act as an enabling conduit for a range of visual and/or narrative arts, offering a creative toolbox that supports practitioners engaged in documentary work across a range of disciplines. This chapter advances three central insights: the increasingly multi-disciplinary nature of contemporary visual, literary and popular cultures; the notable aesthetic and ideological potentialities possessed by polyvocal, multi-disciplinary and multi-register creative practices and strategies; and animated documentary’s privileged position at the forefront of present-day re-theorisations of a range of foundational documentary concepts, such as the repository, the record and the archive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Indeterminate and Intermediate or Animated Nonfiction: Why Now? Before Sound, there was Soul: The Role of Animation in Silent Nonfiction Cinema From Contextualisation to Categorisation of Animated Documentaries Animated Documentary, Recollection, ‘Re-enactment’ and Temporality The Reasons for Animating Reality: Animated Documentary and Re-enactment in the Work of Jonas Odell
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1